加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华青霉素去标签:方法、结果和未来方向的比较

Sujen Saravanabavan, Amneet Aulakh, Josh Douglas, Chelsea Elwood, Stephanie Erdle, Jennifer Grant, Kristopher T Kang, Natasha Kwan, Katie Lacaria, Tim T Y Lau, Colin Lee, Victor Leung, Yu-Chen Lin, Allison Mah, Anne Nguyen, Vanessa Paquette, Ashley Roberts, Melissa Watt, Julie Van Schalkwyk, Bei Yuan Zhang, Raymond Mak, Tiffany Wong
{"title":"加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华青霉素去标签:方法、结果和未来方向的比较","authors":"Sujen Saravanabavan,&nbsp;Amneet Aulakh,&nbsp;Josh Douglas,&nbsp;Chelsea Elwood,&nbsp;Stephanie Erdle,&nbsp;Jennifer Grant,&nbsp;Kristopher T Kang,&nbsp;Natasha Kwan,&nbsp;Katie Lacaria,&nbsp;Tim T Y Lau,&nbsp;Colin Lee,&nbsp;Victor Leung,&nbsp;Yu-Chen Lin,&nbsp;Allison Mah,&nbsp;Anne Nguyen,&nbsp;Vanessa Paquette,&nbsp;Ashley Roberts,&nbsp;Melissa Watt,&nbsp;Julie Van Schalkwyk,&nbsp;Bei Yuan Zhang,&nbsp;Raymond Mak,&nbsp;Tiffany Wong","doi":"10.1186/s13223-023-00777-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inaccurate penicillin allergy labels lead to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions and harmful patient consequences. System-wide efforts are needed to remove incorrect penicillin allergy labels, but more health services research is required on how to best deliver these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from five hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from October 2018-May 2022. The primary outcomes of this study were to outline de-labelling protocol designs, identify the roles of various healthcare professionals in de-labelling protocols and identify rates of de-labelling penicillin allergies and associated adverse events at various institutions. Our secondary outcome was to describe de-labelling rates for special populations, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised subpopulations. To achieve these outcomes, participating institutions provided their de-labelling protocol designs and data on program participants. Protocols were then compared to find common themes and differences. Furthermore, adverse events were reviewed and percentages of patients de-labelled at each institution and in total were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocols demonstrated a high level of variability, including different methods of participant identification, risk-stratification and roles of providers. All protocols used oral and direct oral challenges, heavily involved pharmacists and had physician oversight. Despite the differences, of the 711 patients enrolled in all programs, 697 (98.0%) were de-labelled. There were 9 adverse events (1.3%) with oral challenges with mainly minor symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrates that de-labelling programs effectively and safely remove penicillin allergy labels, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised patients. Consistent with current literature, most patients with a penicillin allergy label are not allergic. De-labelling programs could benefit from increasing clinician engagement by increasing accessibility of resources to providers, including guidance for de-labelling of special populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7702,"journal":{"name":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","volume":"19 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Penicillin de-labelling in vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of approaches, outcomes and future directions.\",\"authors\":\"Sujen Saravanabavan,&nbsp;Amneet Aulakh,&nbsp;Josh Douglas,&nbsp;Chelsea Elwood,&nbsp;Stephanie Erdle,&nbsp;Jennifer Grant,&nbsp;Kristopher T Kang,&nbsp;Natasha Kwan,&nbsp;Katie Lacaria,&nbsp;Tim T Y Lau,&nbsp;Colin Lee,&nbsp;Victor Leung,&nbsp;Yu-Chen Lin,&nbsp;Allison Mah,&nbsp;Anne Nguyen,&nbsp;Vanessa Paquette,&nbsp;Ashley Roberts,&nbsp;Melissa Watt,&nbsp;Julie Van Schalkwyk,&nbsp;Bei Yuan Zhang,&nbsp;Raymond Mak,&nbsp;Tiffany Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13223-023-00777-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inaccurate penicillin allergy labels lead to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions and harmful patient consequences. System-wide efforts are needed to remove incorrect penicillin allergy labels, but more health services research is required on how to best deliver these services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data was extracted from five hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from October 2018-May 2022. The primary outcomes of this study were to outline de-labelling protocol designs, identify the roles of various healthcare professionals in de-labelling protocols and identify rates of de-labelling penicillin allergies and associated adverse events at various institutions. Our secondary outcome was to describe de-labelling rates for special populations, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised subpopulations. To achieve these outcomes, participating institutions provided their de-labelling protocol designs and data on program participants. Protocols were then compared to find common themes and differences. Furthermore, adverse events were reviewed and percentages of patients de-labelled at each institution and in total were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Protocols demonstrated a high level of variability, including different methods of participant identification, risk-stratification and roles of providers. All protocols used oral and direct oral challenges, heavily involved pharmacists and had physician oversight. Despite the differences, of the 711 patients enrolled in all programs, 697 (98.0%) were de-labelled. There were 9 adverse events (1.3%) with oral challenges with mainly minor symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrates that de-labelling programs effectively and safely remove penicillin allergy labels, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised patients. Consistent with current literature, most patients with a penicillin allergy label are not allergic. De-labelling programs could benefit from increasing clinician engagement by increasing accessibility of resources to providers, including guidance for de-labelling of special populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7702,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10114447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00777-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy, Asthma, and Clinical Immunology : Official Journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-023-00777-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不准确的青霉素过敏标签导致不适当的抗生素处方和有害的患者后果。需要全系统努力消除不正确的青霉素过敏标签,但需要对如何最好地提供这些服务进行更多的卫生服务研究。方法:2018年10月至2022年5月,数据提取自加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华的五家医院。本研究的主要结果是概述了取消标签的方案设计,确定各种医疗保健专业人员在取消标签方案中的作用,并确定在不同机构中取消标签青霉素过敏和相关不良事件的发生率。我们的次要结局是描述特殊人群的去标签率,包括儿科、产科和免疫功能低下亚群。为了实现这些成果,参与机构提供了它们的去标签方案设计和项目参与者的数据。然后对协议进行比较,找出共同的主题和差异。此外,对不良事件进行了回顾,并计算了每个机构和总数中去标签患者的百分比。结果:方案表现出高度的可变性,包括参与者识别、风险分层和提供者角色的不同方法。所有方案均采用口服和直接口服挑战,大量药剂师参与其中,并有医生监督。尽管存在差异,在所有项目中纳入的711名患者中,697名(98.0%)被去除标签。有9例不良事件(1.3%)发生口腔攻击,主要症状轻微。结论:我们的数据表明,去标签项目有效且安全地去除青霉素过敏标签,包括儿科、产科和免疫功能低下患者。与目前的文献一致,大多数有青霉素过敏标签的患者并不过敏。通过增加对提供者的资源可及性,包括对特殊人群的去标签指导,增加临床医生的参与,将使去标签项目受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Penicillin de-labelling in vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of approaches, outcomes and future directions.

Penicillin de-labelling in vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of approaches, outcomes and future directions.

Background: Inaccurate penicillin allergy labels lead to inappropriate antibiotic prescriptions and harmful patient consequences. System-wide efforts are needed to remove incorrect penicillin allergy labels, but more health services research is required on how to best deliver these services.

Methods: Data was extracted from five hospitals in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from October 2018-May 2022. The primary outcomes of this study were to outline de-labelling protocol designs, identify the roles of various healthcare professionals in de-labelling protocols and identify rates of de-labelling penicillin allergies and associated adverse events at various institutions. Our secondary outcome was to describe de-labelling rates for special populations, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised subpopulations. To achieve these outcomes, participating institutions provided their de-labelling protocol designs and data on program participants. Protocols were then compared to find common themes and differences. Furthermore, adverse events were reviewed and percentages of patients de-labelled at each institution and in total were calculated.

Results: Protocols demonstrated a high level of variability, including different methods of participant identification, risk-stratification and roles of providers. All protocols used oral and direct oral challenges, heavily involved pharmacists and had physician oversight. Despite the differences, of the 711 patients enrolled in all programs, 697 (98.0%) were de-labelled. There were 9 adverse events (1.3%) with oral challenges with mainly minor symptoms.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that de-labelling programs effectively and safely remove penicillin allergy labels, including pediatric, obstetric and immunocompromised patients. Consistent with current literature, most patients with a penicillin allergy label are not allergic. De-labelling programs could benefit from increasing clinician engagement by increasing accessibility of resources to providers, including guidance for de-labelling of special populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信