探索影响家庭透析患者参与远程医疗辅助家访的因素:混合方法研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Ginger Chu PhD, Carla Silva GDip MtlHith, Kelly Adams BN, Bobby Chacko MD, John Attia PhD, Nicole Nathan PhD, Rhonda Wilson PhD
{"title":"探索影响家庭透析患者参与远程医疗辅助家访的因素:混合方法研究。","authors":"Ginger Chu PhD,&nbsp;Carla Silva GDip MtlHith,&nbsp;Kelly Adams BN,&nbsp;Bobby Chacko MD,&nbsp;John Attia PhD,&nbsp;Nicole Nathan PhD,&nbsp;Rhonda Wilson PhD","doi":"10.1111/jorc.12475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Technology, such as telehealth, is increasingly used to support home dialysis patients. The challenges patients and carers face when home dialysis nursing visits are provided via telehealth have yet to be explored.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To explore patients' and carers' perspectives as they transition to telehealth-assisted home visits and identify the factors influencing their engagement in this modality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods approach, guideed by the behaviour change wheel using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour model to explore individual's perceptions of telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Partcipants</h3>\n \n <p>Home dialysis patients and their carers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measuruements</h3>\n \n <p>Suveys and qualitative interviews.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A mixed-methods approach was undertaken, combining surveys and qualitative interviews. It was guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation- Behaviour model to explore individuals' perceptions of telehealth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty-four surveys and 21 interviews were completed. Of 34 survey participants, 24 (70%) preferred face-to-face home visits and 23 (68%) had previously engaged in telehealth. The main perceived barrier identified in the surveys was knowledge of telehealth, but participants believed there were opportunities for them to use telehealth. Interview results revealed that the convenience and flexibility of telehealth were perceived as the main advantages of telehealth. However, challenges such as the ability to conduct virtual assessments and to communicate effectively between clinicians and patients were identified. Patients from non-English speaking backgrounds and those with disabilities were particularly vulnerable because of the many barriers they faced. These challenges may further entrench the negative view regarding technology, as discussed by interview participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study suggested that a blended model combining telehealth and face-to-face services would allow patient choice and is important to facilitate equity of care, particularly for those patients who were unwilling or had difficulty adopting technology.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16947,"journal":{"name":"Journal of renal care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12475","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the factors affecting home dialysis patients' participation in telehealth-assisted home visits: A mixed-methods study\",\"authors\":\"Ginger Chu PhD,&nbsp;Carla Silva GDip MtlHith,&nbsp;Kelly Adams BN,&nbsp;Bobby Chacko MD,&nbsp;John Attia PhD,&nbsp;Nicole Nathan PhD,&nbsp;Rhonda Wilson PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jorc.12475\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Technology, such as telehealth, is increasingly used to support home dialysis patients. The challenges patients and carers face when home dialysis nursing visits are provided via telehealth have yet to be explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To explore patients' and carers' perspectives as they transition to telehealth-assisted home visits and identify the factors influencing their engagement in this modality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>A mixed-methods approach, guideed by the behaviour change wheel using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour model to explore individual's perceptions of telehealth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Partcipants</h3>\\n \\n <p>Home dialysis patients and their carers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Measuruements</h3>\\n \\n <p>Suveys and qualitative interviews.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A mixed-methods approach was undertaken, combining surveys and qualitative interviews. It was guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation- Behaviour model to explore individuals' perceptions of telehealth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty-four surveys and 21 interviews were completed. Of 34 survey participants, 24 (70%) preferred face-to-face home visits and 23 (68%) had previously engaged in telehealth. The main perceived barrier identified in the surveys was knowledge of telehealth, but participants believed there were opportunities for them to use telehealth. Interview results revealed that the convenience and flexibility of telehealth were perceived as the main advantages of telehealth. However, challenges such as the ability to conduct virtual assessments and to communicate effectively between clinicians and patients were identified. Patients from non-English speaking backgrounds and those with disabilities were particularly vulnerable because of the many barriers they faced. These challenges may further entrench the negative view regarding technology, as discussed by interview participants.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study suggested that a blended model combining telehealth and face-to-face services would allow patient choice and is important to facilitate equity of care, particularly for those patients who were unwilling or had difficulty adopting technology.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jorc.12475\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of renal care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12475\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of renal care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jorc.12475","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:远程医疗等技术越来越多地被用于支持家庭透析患者。通过远程医疗提供家庭透析护理探视时,患者和护理人员面临哪些挑战尚待探讨:探索患者和护理人员在过渡到远程医疗辅助家访时的观点,并确定影响他们参与这种方式的因素:设计:采用混合方法,以行为改变轮为指导,使用能力、机会、动机-行为模型来探讨个人对远程医疗的看法:研究对象:家庭透析患者及其护理人员:测量:问卷调查和定性访谈:采用混合方法,将调查和定性访谈相结合。以行为改变轮为指导,使用能力、机会、动机-行为模型来探讨个人对远程保健的看法:完成了 34 份调查和 21 次访谈。在 34 名调查参与者中,24 人(70%)更喜欢面对面的家访,23 人(68%)以前参与过远程保健。调查中发现的主要障碍是对远程保健的了解,但参与者认为他们有机会使用远程保健。访谈结果显示,远程保健的便利性和灵活性被认为是远程保健的主要优势。但也发现了一些挑战,如进行虚拟评估的能力以及临床医生和患者之间有效沟通的能力。非英语背景的患者和残疾患者尤其容易受到影响,因为他们面临着许多障碍。正如访谈参与者所讨论的那样,这些挑战可能会进一步加深人们对技术的负面看法:这项研究表明,远程医疗与面对面服务相结合的混合模式将允许患者做出选择,这对于促进医疗服务的公平性非常重要,尤其是对于那些不愿意或难以采用技术的患者而言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the factors affecting home dialysis patients' participation in telehealth-assisted home visits: A mixed-methods study

Background

Technology, such as telehealth, is increasingly used to support home dialysis patients. The challenges patients and carers face when home dialysis nursing visits are provided via telehealth have yet to be explored.

Objectives

To explore patients' and carers' perspectives as they transition to telehealth-assisted home visits and identify the factors influencing their engagement in this modality.

Design

A mixed-methods approach, guideed by the behaviour change wheel using the capability, opportunity, motivation-behaviour model to explore individual's perceptions of telehealth.

Partcipants

Home dialysis patients and their carers.

Measuruements

Suveys and qualitative interviews.

Methods

A mixed-methods approach was undertaken, combining surveys and qualitative interviews. It was guided by the Behaviour Change Wheel using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation- Behaviour model to explore individuals' perceptions of telehealth.

Results

Thirty-four surveys and 21 interviews were completed. Of 34 survey participants, 24 (70%) preferred face-to-face home visits and 23 (68%) had previously engaged in telehealth. The main perceived barrier identified in the surveys was knowledge of telehealth, but participants believed there were opportunities for them to use telehealth. Interview results revealed that the convenience and flexibility of telehealth were perceived as the main advantages of telehealth. However, challenges such as the ability to conduct virtual assessments and to communicate effectively between clinicians and patients were identified. Patients from non-English speaking backgrounds and those with disabilities were particularly vulnerable because of the many barriers they faced. These challenges may further entrench the negative view regarding technology, as discussed by interview participants.

Conclusion

This study suggested that a blended model combining telehealth and face-to-face services would allow patient choice and is important to facilitate equity of care, particularly for those patients who were unwilling or had difficulty adopting technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of renal care
Journal of renal care Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Care (JORC), formally EDTNA/ERCA Journal, is the official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Nursing Association/European Renal Care Association (EDTNA/ERCA). The Journal of Renal Care is an international peer-reviewed journal for the multi-professional health care team caring for people with kidney disease and those who research this specialised area of health care. Kidney disease is a chronic illness with four basic treatments: haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis conservative management and transplantation, which includes emptive transplantation, living donor & cadavaric transplantation. The continuous world-wide increase of people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) means that research and shared knowledge into the causes and treatment is vital to delay the progression of CKD and to improve treatments and the care given. The Journal of Renal Care is an important journal for all health-care professionals working in this and associated conditions, such as diabetes and cardio-vascular disease amongst others. It covers the trajectory of the disease from the first diagnosis to palliative care and includes acute renal injury. The Journal of Renal Care accepts that kidney disease affects not only the patients but also their families and significant others and provides a forum for both the psycho-social and physiological aspects of the disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信