在磁共振成像中使用图像注册和 U-Net 对基于磁共振的乳腺密度进行两种全自动数据驱动三维全乳腺分割策略,重点关注可重复性。

4区 计算机科学 Q1 Arts and Humanities
Jia Ying, Renee Cattell, Tianyun Zhao, Lan Lei, Zhao Jiang, Shahid M Hussain, Yi Gao, H-H Sherry Chow, Alison T Stopeck, Patricia A Thompson, Chuan Huang
{"title":"在磁共振成像中使用图像注册和 U-Net 对基于磁共振的乳腺密度进行两种全自动数据驱动三维全乳腺分割策略,重点关注可重复性。","authors":"Jia Ying, Renee Cattell, Tianyun Zhao, Lan Lei, Zhao Jiang, Shahid M Hussain, Yi Gao, H-H Sherry Chow, Alison T Stopeck, Patricia A Thompson, Chuan Huang","doi":"10.1186/s42492-022-00121-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Presence of higher breast density (BD) and persistence over time are risk factors for breast cancer. A quantitatively accurate and highly reproducible BD measure that relies on precise and reproducible whole-breast segmentation is desirable. In this study, we aimed to develop a highly reproducible and accurate whole-breast segmentation algorithm for the generation of reproducible BD measures. Three datasets of volunteers from two clinical trials were included. Breast MR images were acquired on 3 T Siemens Biograph mMR, Prisma, and Skyra using 3D Cartesian six-echo GRE sequences with a fat-water separation technique. Two whole-breast segmentation strategies, utilizing image registration and 3D U-Net, were developed. Manual segmentation was performed. A task-based analysis was performed: a previously developed MR-based BD measure, MagDensity, was calculated and assessed using automated and manual segmentation. The mean squared error (MSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between MagDensity were evaluated using the manual segmentation as a reference. The test-retest reproducibility of MagDensity derived from different breast segmentation methods was assessed using the difference between the test and retest measures (Δ<sub>2-1</sub>), MSE, and ICC. The results showed that MagDensity derived by the registration and deep learning segmentation methods exhibited high concordance with manual segmentation, with ICCs of 0.986 (95%CI: 0.974-0.993) and 0.983 (95%CI: 0.961-0.992), respectively. For test-retest analysis, MagDensity derived using the registration algorithm achieved the smallest MSE of 0.370 and highest ICC of 0.993 (95%CI: 0.982-0.997) when compared to other segmentation methods. In conclusion, the proposed registration and deep learning whole-breast segmentation methods are accurate and reliable for estimating BD. Both methods outperformed a previously developed algorithm and manual segmentation in the test-retest assessment, with the registration exhibiting superior performance for highly reproducible BD measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":52384,"journal":{"name":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","volume":"5 1","pages":"25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two fully automated data-driven 3D whole-breast segmentation strategies in MRI for MR-based breast density using image registration and U-Net with a focus on reproducibility.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Ying, Renee Cattell, Tianyun Zhao, Lan Lei, Zhao Jiang, Shahid M Hussain, Yi Gao, H-H Sherry Chow, Alison T Stopeck, Patricia A Thompson, Chuan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s42492-022-00121-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Presence of higher breast density (BD) and persistence over time are risk factors for breast cancer. A quantitatively accurate and highly reproducible BD measure that relies on precise and reproducible whole-breast segmentation is desirable. In this study, we aimed to develop a highly reproducible and accurate whole-breast segmentation algorithm for the generation of reproducible BD measures. Three datasets of volunteers from two clinical trials were included. Breast MR images were acquired on 3 T Siemens Biograph mMR, Prisma, and Skyra using 3D Cartesian six-echo GRE sequences with a fat-water separation technique. Two whole-breast segmentation strategies, utilizing image registration and 3D U-Net, were developed. Manual segmentation was performed. A task-based analysis was performed: a previously developed MR-based BD measure, MagDensity, was calculated and assessed using automated and manual segmentation. The mean squared error (MSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between MagDensity were evaluated using the manual segmentation as a reference. The test-retest reproducibility of MagDensity derived from different breast segmentation methods was assessed using the difference between the test and retest measures (Δ<sub>2-1</sub>), MSE, and ICC. The results showed that MagDensity derived by the registration and deep learning segmentation methods exhibited high concordance with manual segmentation, with ICCs of 0.986 (95%CI: 0.974-0.993) and 0.983 (95%CI: 0.961-0.992), respectively. For test-retest analysis, MagDensity derived using the registration algorithm achieved the smallest MSE of 0.370 and highest ICC of 0.993 (95%CI: 0.982-0.997) when compared to other segmentation methods. In conclusion, the proposed registration and deep learning whole-breast segmentation methods are accurate and reliable for estimating BD. Both methods outperformed a previously developed algorithm and manual segmentation in the test-retest assessment, with the registration exhibiting superior performance for highly reproducible BD measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554077/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-022-00121-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-022-00121-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

较高的乳腺密度(BD)和持续时间是乳腺癌的危险因素。一种定量准确、高度可重现的乳腺密度测量方法需要依赖于精确、可重现的全乳房分割。在这项研究中,我们旨在开发一种可重复性高且准确的全乳房分割算法,以生成可重复的 BD 测量值。研究对象包括两个临床试验中的三个志愿者数据集。乳腺 MR 图像由 3 T 西门子 Biograph mMR、Prisma 和 Skyra 使用三维笛卡尔六回波 GRE 序列和脂肪水分离技术采集。利用图像配准和三维 U-Net 开发了两种全乳分割策略。进行了手动分割。进行了基于任务的分析:使用自动和手动分割计算和评估了之前开发的基于 MR 的 BD 测量方法 MagDensity。以手动分割作为参考,评估了 MagDensity 之间的均方误差 (MSE) 和类内相关系数 (ICC)。使用测试和重测测量值之间的差异(Δ2-1)、MSE 和 ICC 评估了不同乳腺分割方法得出的 MagDensity 的测试-重测重现性。结果表明,由注册和深度学习分割方法得出的MagDensity与人工分割的一致性很高,ICC分别为0.986(95%CI:0.974-0.993)和0.983(95%CI:0.961-0.992)。在重复测试分析中,与其他分割方法相比,使用配准算法得出的 MagDensity 的 MSE 最小,为 0.370,ICC 最高,为 0.993(95%CI:0.982-0.997)。总之,所提出的配准和深度学习全乳房分割方法在估计 BD 方面准确可靠。这两种方法在测试-重测评估中的表现均优于之前开发的算法和人工分割,其中配准方法在高重现性 BD 测量中表现出更优越的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Two fully automated data-driven 3D whole-breast segmentation strategies in MRI for MR-based breast density using image registration and U-Net with a focus on reproducibility.

Two fully automated data-driven 3D whole-breast segmentation strategies in MRI for MR-based breast density using image registration and U-Net with a focus on reproducibility.

Two fully automated data-driven 3D whole-breast segmentation strategies in MRI for MR-based breast density using image registration and U-Net with a focus on reproducibility.

Two fully automated data-driven 3D whole-breast segmentation strategies in MRI for MR-based breast density using image registration and U-Net with a focus on reproducibility.

Presence of higher breast density (BD) and persistence over time are risk factors for breast cancer. A quantitatively accurate and highly reproducible BD measure that relies on precise and reproducible whole-breast segmentation is desirable. In this study, we aimed to develop a highly reproducible and accurate whole-breast segmentation algorithm for the generation of reproducible BD measures. Three datasets of volunteers from two clinical trials were included. Breast MR images were acquired on 3 T Siemens Biograph mMR, Prisma, and Skyra using 3D Cartesian six-echo GRE sequences with a fat-water separation technique. Two whole-breast segmentation strategies, utilizing image registration and 3D U-Net, were developed. Manual segmentation was performed. A task-based analysis was performed: a previously developed MR-based BD measure, MagDensity, was calculated and assessed using automated and manual segmentation. The mean squared error (MSE) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between MagDensity were evaluated using the manual segmentation as a reference. The test-retest reproducibility of MagDensity derived from different breast segmentation methods was assessed using the difference between the test and retest measures (Δ2-1), MSE, and ICC. The results showed that MagDensity derived by the registration and deep learning segmentation methods exhibited high concordance with manual segmentation, with ICCs of 0.986 (95%CI: 0.974-0.993) and 0.983 (95%CI: 0.961-0.992), respectively. For test-retest analysis, MagDensity derived using the registration algorithm achieved the smallest MSE of 0.370 and highest ICC of 0.993 (95%CI: 0.982-0.997) when compared to other segmentation methods. In conclusion, the proposed registration and deep learning whole-breast segmentation methods are accurate and reliable for estimating BD. Both methods outperformed a previously developed algorithm and manual segmentation in the test-retest assessment, with the registration exhibiting superior performance for highly reproducible BD measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art
Visual Computing for Industry, Biomedicine, and Art Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信