Sivelestat治疗急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Qiongli Ding, Yi Wang, Chunbo Yang, Dilireba Tuerxun, Xiangyou Yu
{"title":"Sivelestat治疗急性肺损伤和急性呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。","authors":"Qiongli Ding,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Chunbo Yang,&nbsp;Dilireba Tuerxun,&nbsp;Xiangyou Yu","doi":"10.1007/s44231-023-00032-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines assess the effect of sivelestat on ALI/ARDS patients, different studies were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang data, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Springer, Ovid and the Cochrane Library were searched using the following key words: (\"Sivelestat\" OR \"Elaspol\") AND (\"ARDS\" OR \"adult respiratory distress syndrome\" OR \"acute lung injury\"). All databases published from January 2000 to August 2022. The treatment group was treated with sivelestat and the control group was given normal saline. The outcome measurements include the mortality of 28-30 days, mechanical ventilation time, ventilation free days, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) on day 3, the incidence of adverse events. The literature search was conducted independently by 2 researchers using standardized methods. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Mean difference (MD), Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) were calculated using random effects model or fixed effects model. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2050 patients were enrolled in 15 studies, including 1069 patients in treatment group and 981 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: compared with the control group, sivelestat can reduce the mortality of 28-30 days (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01), shortened mechanical ventilation time (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI = - 0.60 to - 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and ICU stays (SMD = - 0.72, 95% CI = - 0.92 to - 0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), increased the ventilation free days (MD = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.42-3.73, <i>p < </i>0.00001) and improve oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) on day 3 (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sivelestat can not only reduce the mortality of ALI/ARDS patients within 28-30 days and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stays, increase ventilation free days, but also improve the oxygenation index of patients on days 3, which has a good effect on the treatment of ALI/ARDS. These findings need to be verified in large-scale trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":73403,"journal":{"name":"Intensive care research","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233530/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Qiongli Ding,&nbsp;Yi Wang,&nbsp;Chunbo Yang,&nbsp;Dilireba Tuerxun,&nbsp;Xiangyou Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44231-023-00032-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines assess the effect of sivelestat on ALI/ARDS patients, different studies were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang data, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Springer, Ovid and the Cochrane Library were searched using the following key words: (\\\"Sivelestat\\\" OR \\\"Elaspol\\\") AND (\\\"ARDS\\\" OR \\\"adult respiratory distress syndrome\\\" OR \\\"acute lung injury\\\"). All databases published from January 2000 to August 2022. The treatment group was treated with sivelestat and the control group was given normal saline. The outcome measurements include the mortality of 28-30 days, mechanical ventilation time, ventilation free days, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) on day 3, the incidence of adverse events. The literature search was conducted independently by 2 researchers using standardized methods. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Mean difference (MD), Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) were calculated using random effects model or fixed effects model. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.4.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2050 patients were enrolled in 15 studies, including 1069 patients in treatment group and 981 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: compared with the control group, sivelestat can reduce the mortality of 28-30 days (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03) and the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.98, <i>p</i> = 0.01), shortened mechanical ventilation time (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI = - 0.60 to - 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.02) and ICU stays (SMD = - 0.72, 95% CI = - 0.92 to - 0.52, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), increased the ventilation free days (MD = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.42-3.73, <i>p < </i>0.00001) and improve oxygenation index (PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) on day 3 (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.36, <i>p</i> = 0.0004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sivelestat can not only reduce the mortality of ALI/ARDS patients within 28-30 days and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stays, increase ventilation free days, but also improve the oxygenation index of patients on days 3, which has a good effect on the treatment of ALI/ARDS. These findings need to be verified in large-scale trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intensive care research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10233530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intensive care research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-023-00032-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive care research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-023-00032-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:中性粒细胞弹性蛋白酶抑制剂西韦司他治疗急性肺损伤(ALI)和急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的疗效仍存在争议。根据PRISMA指南进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,评估西韦司他对ALI/ARDS患者的影响,包括不同的研究。方法:检索电子数据库、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据、VIP、PubMed、Embase、Springer、Ovid和Cochrane Library,检索关键词为:(“Sivelestat”或“Elaspol”)和(“ARDS”或“成人呼吸窘迫综合征”或“急性肺损伤”)。2000年1月至2022年8月公布的所有数据库。治疗组给予西韦司他治疗,对照组给予生理盐水。结果测量包括28-30天的死亡率、机械通气时间、无通气天数、重症监护室(ICU)住院时间、第3天的氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)、不良事件发生率。文献检索由2名研究人员使用标准化方法独立进行。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具来评估纳入研究的质量。使用随机效应模型或固定效应模型计算平均差(MD)、标准化平均差(SMD)和相对风险(RR)。所有统计分析均使用RevMan软件5.4进行。结果:共有2050名患者参与了15项研究,其中1069名患者为治疗组,981名患者为对照组。荟萃分析结果显示:与对照组相比,西韦司他可降低28-30天的死亡率(RR = 0.81195%CI = 0.66-0.98,p = 0.03)和不良事件发生率(RR = 0.91,95%CI = 0.85-0.98,p = 0.01),缩短了机械通气时间(SMD = - 0.32,95%CI = - 0.60至- 0.04,p = 0.02)和ICU住院(SMD = - 0.72,95%CI = - 0.92至- 0.52,p p 0.00001),并在第3天改善氧合指数(PaO2/FiO2)(SMD = 0.88,95%CI = 0.39-1.36,p = 结论:西韦司他不仅能降低ALI/ARDS患者28-30天内的死亡率和不良事件的发生率,缩短机械通气时间和ICU住院时间,增加无通气天数,而且能改善患者第3天的氧合指数,对治疗ALI/ARDS有良好的疗效。这些发现需要在大规模试验中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Effect of Sivelestat in the Treatment of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: The efficacy of neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat in the treatment of acute lung injury (ALI) and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) remains controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines assess the effect of sivelestat on ALI/ARDS patients, different studies were included.

Methods: Electronic databases, National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan fang data, VIP, PubMed, Embase, Springer, Ovid and the Cochrane Library were searched using the following key words: ("Sivelestat" OR "Elaspol") AND ("ARDS" OR "adult respiratory distress syndrome" OR "acute lung injury"). All databases published from January 2000 to August 2022. The treatment group was treated with sivelestat and the control group was given normal saline. The outcome measurements include the mortality of 28-30 days, mechanical ventilation time, ventilation free days, intensive care unit (ICU) stays, oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3, the incidence of adverse events. The literature search was conducted independently by 2 researchers using standardized methods. We used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool to assess the quality of the included studies. Mean difference (MD), Standardized mean difference (SMD) and relative risk (RR) were calculated using random effects model or fixed effects model. All statistical analyses were performed using RevMan software 5.4.

Results: A total of 2050 patients were enrolled in 15 studies, including 1069 patients in treatment group and 981 patients in the control group. The results of the meta-analysis showed that: compared with the control group, sivelestat can reduce the mortality of 28-30 days (RR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.98, p = 0.03) and the incidence of adverse events (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.85-0.98, p = 0.01), shortened mechanical ventilation time (SMD = - 0.32, 95% CI = - 0.60 to - 0.04, p = 0.02) and ICU stays (SMD = - 0.72, 95% CI = - 0.92 to - 0.52, p < 0.00001), increased the ventilation free days (MD = 3.57, 95% CI = 3.42-3.73, p < 0.00001) and improve oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) on day 3 (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.39-1.36, p = 0.0004).

Conclusions: Sivelestat can not only reduce the mortality of ALI/ARDS patients within 28-30 days and the incidence of adverse events, shorten the mechanical ventilation time and ICU stays, increase ventilation free days, but also improve the oxygenation index of patients on days 3, which has a good effect on the treatment of ALI/ARDS. These findings need to be verified in large-scale trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信