“不,是你:”Dyadic对变革的需求预测了关系教育的结果。

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
J. Scott Crapo PhD, Kay Bradford PhD, Olena Kopystynska PhD, Bryan K. Spuhler PhD, Brian J. Higginbotham PhD
{"title":"“不,是你:”Dyadic对变革的需求预测了关系教育的结果。","authors":"J. Scott Crapo PhD,&nbsp;Kay Bradford PhD,&nbsp;Olena Kopystynska PhD,&nbsp;Bryan K. Spuhler PhD,&nbsp;Brian J. Higginbotham PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmft.12658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Relationship education (RE) efforts have been shown to help couples and individuals with a variety of family relationships. However, much still needs to be identified in terms of what factors are salient to outcomes. Drawing on therapeutic models of change, we have identified perceived need for change as one such potential factor. Using data from a couple RE course (<i>n</i> = 447 couples), we assessed how dyadic congruence and average ratings of each partner's need for change were associated with change in three RE outcomes: knowledge, communication, and commitment. In general, the more partners perceived that their partner needed to change, above and beyond what their partner thought, the less change occurred. Implications for RE programming and implementation are discussed, as well as the potential role of therapeutic models and techniques in RE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16320,"journal":{"name":"Journal of marital and family therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“No, It's You:” Dyadic perceived need for change predicts relationship education outcomes\",\"authors\":\"J. Scott Crapo PhD,&nbsp;Kay Bradford PhD,&nbsp;Olena Kopystynska PhD,&nbsp;Bryan K. Spuhler PhD,&nbsp;Brian J. Higginbotham PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmft.12658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Relationship education (RE) efforts have been shown to help couples and individuals with a variety of family relationships. However, much still needs to be identified in terms of what factors are salient to outcomes. Drawing on therapeutic models of change, we have identified perceived need for change as one such potential factor. Using data from a couple RE course (<i>n</i> = 447 couples), we assessed how dyadic congruence and average ratings of each partner's need for change were associated with change in three RE outcomes: knowledge, communication, and commitment. In general, the more partners perceived that their partner needed to change, above and beyond what their partner thought, the less change occurred. Implications for RE programming and implementation are discussed, as well as the potential role of therapeutic models and techniques in RE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16320,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of marital and family therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of marital and family therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.12658\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of marital and family therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.12658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关系教育(RE)的努力已被证明可以帮助有各种家庭关系的夫妇和个人。然而,在哪些因素对结果有显著影响方面,仍有很多需要确定。根据改变的治疗模型,我们已经确定了对改变的感知需求是这样一个潜在因素。使用来自一对RE课程(n = 447对夫妇),我们评估了二元一致性和每个伴侣对改变需求的平均评分如何与三个RE结果的变化相关:知识、沟通和承诺。一般来说,伴侣越是认为他们的伴侣需要改变,超出了伴侣的想法,发生的改变就越少。讨论了RE规划和实施的意义,以及治疗模型和技术在RE中的潜在作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“No, It's You:” Dyadic perceived need for change predicts relationship education outcomes

Relationship education (RE) efforts have been shown to help couples and individuals with a variety of family relationships. However, much still needs to be identified in terms of what factors are salient to outcomes. Drawing on therapeutic models of change, we have identified perceived need for change as one such potential factor. Using data from a couple RE course (n = 447 couples), we assessed how dyadic congruence and average ratings of each partner's need for change were associated with change in three RE outcomes: knowledge, communication, and commitment. In general, the more partners perceived that their partner needed to change, above and beyond what their partner thought, the less change occurred. Implications for RE programming and implementation are discussed, as well as the potential role of therapeutic models and techniques in RE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Marital & Family Therapy (JMFT) is published quarterly by the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy and is one of the best known and most influential family therapy journals in the world. JMFT is a peer-reviewed journal that advances the professional understanding of marital and family functioning and the most effective psychotherapeutic treatment of couple and family distress. Toward that end, the Journal publishes articles on research, theory, clinical practice, and training in marital and family therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信