三种手部运动对经桡动脉心导管术后肢体功能改善的效果比较

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Xinyue Zhang, Zhipeng Bao, Lan Wei, Zairan Zhang, Yanli Hu, Dandan Xu, Wei Sun, Dongmei Xu
{"title":"三种手部运动对经桡动脉心导管术后肢体功能改善的效果比较","authors":"Xinyue Zhang,&nbsp;Zhipeng Bao,&nbsp;Lan Wei,&nbsp;Zairan Zhang,&nbsp;Yanli Hu,&nbsp;Dandan Xu,&nbsp;Wei Sun,&nbsp;Dongmei Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to compare effects of different hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 20, 2020, to July 20, 2021, at an academic medical center. A total of 102 participants were selected from a Class A tertiary hospital in Nanjing, China and randomized into three groups: finger exercise group (<em>n</em> = 34), acupoint massage group (<em>n</em> = 34), and handgrip exercise group (<em>n</em> = 34). Symptoms of edema and pain were defined as primary outcomes, while skin temperature and degree of bleeding as secondary outcomes, which were monitored and measured 1, 2, and 4 h, after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 99 participants who completed the process, the palm edema was gradually relieved in the handgrip exercise group at 2 h (<em>H</em> = 6.710, <em>P</em> = 0.035) and 4 h (<em>H</em> = 10.060, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) following the intervention. The edema of fingers in the handgrip exercise group was obviously relieved at 2 h (<em>H</em> = 9.353, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and 4 h (<em>H</em> = 10.699, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) following the intervention compared with the other two groups. In addition, the pain score at 4 h (<em>H</em> = 7.048, <em>P</em> = 0.029) was clearly decreased in the handgrip exercise group. However, there was no significant difference in the punctured limb’s skin temperature (<em>H</em> = 0.922, <em>P</em> = 0.631) and the degree of bleeding (<em>H</em> = 0.123, <em>P</em> = 0.940) among the three groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found that handgrip exercise is more effective in reducing the edema of the limbs than finger exercise and acupoint massage.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/79/main.PMC10148249.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the effects of three kinds of hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization\",\"authors\":\"Xinyue Zhang,&nbsp;Zhipeng Bao,&nbsp;Lan Wei,&nbsp;Zairan Zhang,&nbsp;Yanli Hu,&nbsp;Dandan Xu,&nbsp;Wei Sun,&nbsp;Dongmei Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnss.2023.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to compare effects of different hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This single-center, randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 20, 2020, to July 20, 2021, at an academic medical center. A total of 102 participants were selected from a Class A tertiary hospital in Nanjing, China and randomized into three groups: finger exercise group (<em>n</em> = 34), acupoint massage group (<em>n</em> = 34), and handgrip exercise group (<em>n</em> = 34). Symptoms of edema and pain were defined as primary outcomes, while skin temperature and degree of bleeding as secondary outcomes, which were monitored and measured 1, 2, and 4 h, after the intervention.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 99 participants who completed the process, the palm edema was gradually relieved in the handgrip exercise group at 2 h (<em>H</em> = 6.710, <em>P</em> = 0.035) and 4 h (<em>H</em> = 10.060, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) following the intervention. The edema of fingers in the handgrip exercise group was obviously relieved at 2 h (<em>H</em> = 9.353, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) and 4 h (<em>H</em> = 10.699, <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) following the intervention compared with the other two groups. In addition, the pain score at 4 h (<em>H</em> = 7.048, <em>P</em> = 0.029) was clearly decreased in the handgrip exercise group. However, there was no significant difference in the punctured limb’s skin temperature (<em>H</em> = 0.922, <em>P</em> = 0.631) and the degree of bleeding (<em>H</em> = 0.123, <em>P</em> = 0.940) among the three groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We found that handgrip exercise is more effective in reducing the edema of the limbs than finger exercise and acupoint massage.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a0/79/main.PMC10148249.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000339\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013223000339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在比较不同手部运动对经桡动脉心导管插入术后患者肢体功能的改善作用。方法该单中心随机临床试验于2020年8月20日至2021年7月20日在一家学术医疗中心进行。共有102名参与者从中国南京的一家三甲医院中选择,并随机分为三组:手指运动组(n=34)、穴位按摩组(n=34%)和握力运动组(n=34)。水肿和疼痛症状被定义为主要结果,而皮肤温度和出血程度被定义为次要结果,在干预后1、2和4小时对其进行监测和测量。结果在完成该过程的99名参与者中,握力运动组在干预后2小时(h=6.710,P=0.035)和4小时(h=10.060,P<;0.001)手掌水肿逐渐缓解。与其他两组相比,握力运动组在干预后2小时(h=9.353,P<;0.01)和4小时(h=10.699,P>;0.001)手指水肿明显减轻。此外,握力运动组在4小时时的疼痛评分(h=7.048,P=0.029)明显降低。然而,三组之间穿刺肢体的皮肤温度(H=0.922,P=0.631)和出血程度(H=0.123,P=0.940)没有显著差异。结论握力运动对减轻四肢水肿的效果优于手指运动和穴位按摩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of the effects of three kinds of hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization

Comparison of the effects of three kinds of hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization

Comparison of the effects of three kinds of hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization

Comparison of the effects of three kinds of hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization

Objectives

This study aimed to compare effects of different hand exercises on improving limb function in patients after transradial cardiac catheterization.

Methods

This single-center, randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 20, 2020, to July 20, 2021, at an academic medical center. A total of 102 participants were selected from a Class A tertiary hospital in Nanjing, China and randomized into three groups: finger exercise group (n = 34), acupoint massage group (n = 34), and handgrip exercise group (n = 34). Symptoms of edema and pain were defined as primary outcomes, while skin temperature and degree of bleeding as secondary outcomes, which were monitored and measured 1, 2, and 4 h, after the intervention.

Results

Among the 99 participants who completed the process, the palm edema was gradually relieved in the handgrip exercise group at 2 h (H = 6.710, P = 0.035) and 4 h (H = 10.060, P < 0.001) following the intervention. The edema of fingers in the handgrip exercise group was obviously relieved at 2 h (H = 9.353, P < 0.01) and 4 h (H = 10.699, P < 0.001) following the intervention compared with the other two groups. In addition, the pain score at 4 h (H = 7.048, P = 0.029) was clearly decreased in the handgrip exercise group. However, there was no significant difference in the punctured limb’s skin temperature (H = 0.922, P = 0.631) and the degree of bleeding (H = 0.123, P = 0.940) among the three groups.

Conclusions

We found that handgrip exercise is more effective in reducing the edema of the limbs than finger exercise and acupoint massage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信