与左束支区起搏相关的临床、血流动力学和生化改善。

IF 0.7 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pau Alonso Fernández, Diego Plaza, Paloma Oltra, Ingrid Cardells, Carla Castillo, Luis Mainar
{"title":"与左束支区起搏相关的临床、血流动力学和生化改善。","authors":"Pau Alonso Fernández,&nbsp;Diego Plaza,&nbsp;Paloma Oltra,&nbsp;Ingrid Cardells,&nbsp;Carla Castillo,&nbsp;Luis Mainar","doi":"10.24875/ACM.21000355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular pacing is associated with risk of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing. The effect of LBBP on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Finally, 50 patients referred for pacemaker implantation were included. LBBP was performed as described previously by Huang et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram and NT-proBNP were performed before and four weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 patients were analyzed. There were not differences between ventricular thresholds during the procedure and 3 months later, LBBP significantly reduced QRS complex duration (148 ± 21 vs. 107 ± 11 ms; p = 0.029). LBBP significantly improved NYHA functional class and reduced NT-proBNP concentration (2888.2 ± 510 vs. 1181 ± 130 pg/ml; p = 0.04). In patients showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and ventricular desynchrony LBBP showed a significant LVEF increase (40.2 ± 7 vs. 55.2 ± 7%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBP was feasible and safe in most of patients. LBBP was associated with reduction in QRS width and with increase in LVEF in patients with ventricular desynchrony, while in patients with normal LVEF it remained unchanged during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":8360,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","volume":"93 1","pages":"44-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/a5/7567AX221-ACM-93-44.PMC10161846.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing.\",\"authors\":\"Pau Alonso Fernández,&nbsp;Diego Plaza,&nbsp;Paloma Oltra,&nbsp;Ingrid Cardells,&nbsp;Carla Castillo,&nbsp;Luis Mainar\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/ACM.21000355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Right ventricular pacing is associated with risk of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing. The effect of LBBP on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been investigated.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Finally, 50 patients referred for pacemaker implantation were included. LBBP was performed as described previously by Huang et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram and NT-proBNP were performed before and four weeks after the procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>50 patients were analyzed. There were not differences between ventricular thresholds during the procedure and 3 months later, LBBP significantly reduced QRS complex duration (148 ± 21 vs. 107 ± 11 ms; p = 0.029). LBBP significantly improved NYHA functional class and reduced NT-proBNP concentration (2888.2 ± 510 vs. 1181 ± 130 pg/ml; p = 0.04). In patients showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and ventricular desynchrony LBBP showed a significant LVEF increase (40.2 ± 7 vs. 55.2 ± 7%; p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LBBP was feasible and safe in most of patients. LBBP was associated with reduction in QRS width and with increase in LVEF in patients with ventricular desynchrony, while in patients with normal LVEF it remained unchanged during follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"44-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9e/a5/7567AX221-ACM-93-44.PMC10161846.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/ACM.21000355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:右心室起搏与心力衰竭和左心室功能障碍的风险相关。左束分支区域起搏(LBBP)已成为传递生理起搏的替代方法。LBBP对n端脑利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)的影响尚未被研究。方法:对50例经转诊行心脏起搏器植入术的患者进行分析。按照Huang等人先前的描述进行LBBP。术前和术后4周分别行经胸超声心动图和NT-proBNP检查。结果:对50例患者进行分析。术中心室阈值与3个月后无差异,LBBP显著降低QRS复杂持续时间(148±21 vs 107±11 ms);P = 0.029)。LBBP显著改善NYHA功能等级,降低NT-proBNP浓度(2888.2±510比1181±130 pg/ml);P = 0.04)。在左室射血分数(LVEF) < 50%和心室非同步性LBBP的患者中,LVEF显著增加(40.2±7比55.2±7%;P < 0.001)。结论:LBBP在大多数患者中是可行和安全的。在心室不同步的患者中,LBBP与QRS宽度减小和LVEF增加有关,而在LVEF正常的患者中,随访期间保持不变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing.

Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing.

Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing.

Clinical, hemodynamic and biochemical improvement related to left bundle branch area pacing.

Background: Right ventricular pacing is associated with risk of heart failure and left ventricular dysfunction. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBP) has emerged as an alternative method for delivering physiological pacing. The effect of LBBP on N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been investigated.

Method: Finally, 50 patients referred for pacemaker implantation were included. LBBP was performed as described previously by Huang et al. Transthoracic echocardiogram and NT-proBNP were performed before and four weeks after the procedure.

Results: 50 patients were analyzed. There were not differences between ventricular thresholds during the procedure and 3 months later, LBBP significantly reduced QRS complex duration (148 ± 21 vs. 107 ± 11 ms; p = 0.029). LBBP significantly improved NYHA functional class and reduced NT-proBNP concentration (2888.2 ± 510 vs. 1181 ± 130 pg/ml; p = 0.04). In patients showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% and ventricular desynchrony LBBP showed a significant LVEF increase (40.2 ± 7 vs. 55.2 ± 7%; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: LBBP was feasible and safe in most of patients. LBBP was associated with reduction in QRS width and with increase in LVEF in patients with ventricular desynchrony, while in patients with normal LVEF it remained unchanged during follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico
Archivos de cardiologia de Mexico Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
176
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信