睡眠mHealth应用和行为改变技术评估。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Behavioral Sleep Medicine Pub Date : 2023-11-02 Epub Date: 2023-01-10 DOI:10.1080/15402002.2022.2161548
Brittany D Lancaster, Rachel Sweenie, Amy E Noser, Caroline M Roberts, Rachelle R Ramsey
{"title":"睡眠mHealth应用和行为改变技术评估。","authors":"Brittany D Lancaster, Rachel Sweenie, Amy E Noser, Caroline M Roberts, Rachelle R Ramsey","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2022.2161548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mobile health apps may be an effective way to increase sleep management skills. Although little has been documented about the content and quality of available sleep management apps, providers often make app recommendations to help with sleep self-management. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the content and quality of commercially available sleep apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a systematic search of the Apple App and Google Play stores, 56 sleep management apps were evaluated. App content was evaluated using the taxonomy of behavior change techniques (BCTs), and app quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep management apps included 0-15 BCTs (<i>M</i> = 6.89) and 0-9 sleep BCTs (<i>M</i> = 4.87). App quality ranged from 2.51 to 4.80 (<i>M</i> = 3.78) out of 5.00. Sleepiest Sleep Sounds Stories, ShutEye: Sleep Tracker, and Mintal Tracker: Sleep Recorder included the highest number of sleep BCTs and highest quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the content and quality of sleep management apps is variable, the findings are promising as many apps included a high number of BCTs and high quality. Although evidence of efficacy through randomized controlled trials is necessary to establish efficacy, this review can aid in app selection in the interim.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"757-773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330944/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sleep mHealth Applications and Behavior Change Techniques Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Brittany D Lancaster, Rachel Sweenie, Amy E Noser, Caroline M Roberts, Rachelle R Ramsey\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15402002.2022.2161548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mobile health apps may be an effective way to increase sleep management skills. Although little has been documented about the content and quality of available sleep management apps, providers often make app recommendations to help with sleep self-management. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the content and quality of commercially available sleep apps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a systematic search of the Apple App and Google Play stores, 56 sleep management apps were evaluated. App content was evaluated using the taxonomy of behavior change techniques (BCTs), and app quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sleep management apps included 0-15 BCTs (<i>M</i> = 6.89) and 0-9 sleep BCTs (<i>M</i> = 4.87). App quality ranged from 2.51 to 4.80 (<i>M</i> = 3.78) out of 5.00. Sleepiest Sleep Sounds Stories, ShutEye: Sleep Tracker, and Mintal Tracker: Sleep Recorder included the highest number of sleep BCTs and highest quality scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the content and quality of sleep management apps is variable, the findings are promising as many apps included a high number of BCTs and high quality. Although evidence of efficacy through randomized controlled trials is necessary to establish efficacy, this review can aid in app selection in the interim.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"757-773\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10330944/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2022.2161548\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2022.2161548","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:移动健康应用程序可能是提高睡眠管理技能的有效方法。尽管关于可用睡眠管理应用程序的内容和质量的文献很少,但提供商通常会提出应用程序建议,以帮助睡眠自我管理。这项研究的目的是系统地评估商用睡眠应用程序的内容和质量。方法:通过对苹果应用程序和谷歌Play商店的系统搜索,对56款睡眠管理应用程序进行了评估。应用程序内容使用行为改变技术分类法(BCT)进行评估,应用程序质量使用移动应用程序评分量表进行评估。结果:睡眠管理应用程序包括0-15个BCT(M=6.89)和0-9个睡眠BCT(M=4.87)。应用程序质量从2.51到4.80(M=3.78)不等(满分5.00)。Sleepiest Sleep Sounds Stories、ShutEye:睡眠跟踪器和Mintal Tracker:睡眠记录器包含最高数量的睡眠BCT和最高质量分数。结论:虽然睡眠管理应用程序的内容和质量各不相同,但研究结果很有希望,因为许多应用程序都包含大量BCT和高质量。尽管通过随机对照试验证明疗效对于确定疗效是必要的,但这篇综述可以帮助在此期间进行应用内选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sleep mHealth Applications and Behavior Change Techniques Evaluation.

Objectives: Mobile health apps may be an effective way to increase sleep management skills. Although little has been documented about the content and quality of available sleep management apps, providers often make app recommendations to help with sleep self-management. The objective of this study was to systematically evaluate the content and quality of commercially available sleep apps.

Methods: Following a systematic search of the Apple App and Google Play stores, 56 sleep management apps were evaluated. App content was evaluated using the taxonomy of behavior change techniques (BCTs), and app quality was assessed using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

Results: Sleep management apps included 0-15 BCTs (M = 6.89) and 0-9 sleep BCTs (M = 4.87). App quality ranged from 2.51 to 4.80 (M = 3.78) out of 5.00. Sleepiest Sleep Sounds Stories, ShutEye: Sleep Tracker, and Mintal Tracker: Sleep Recorder included the highest number of sleep BCTs and highest quality scores.

Conclusions: While the content and quality of sleep management apps is variable, the findings are promising as many apps included a high number of BCTs and high quality. Although evidence of efficacy through randomized controlled trials is necessary to establish efficacy, this review can aid in app selection in the interim.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Sleep Medicine
Behavioral Sleep Medicine CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信