超声评估分娩镇痛后胃排空速度:一项前瞻性对照观察研究。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Yongfeng Liu, Qian Wang, Qinghai Zuo
{"title":"超声评估分娩镇痛后胃排空速度:一项前瞻性对照观察研究。","authors":"Yongfeng Liu,&nbsp;Qian Wang,&nbsp;Qinghai Zuo","doi":"10.2147/TCRM.S410984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of labor analgesia on gastric emptying rate will affect the management of fasting during the perinatal period. To evaluate gastric emptying after labor analgesia using the gastric antrum ultrasound examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2022 to January 2023, a prospective controlled observational study was conducted. The Study group (epidural analgesia group) and Observation group (pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions group) were successively enrolled and grouped using the random envelope method. However, labor analgesia was supplied according to maternal women's wishes, and intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed to establish its effect on stomach emptying. The gastric emptying rate during the first stage of labor was considered to be the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 2022 to January 2023, 120 persons were studied, 90 in the Study group and 30 in the Observation group. 33 people's analgesic selection was discordant with the grouped one. ITT analysis showed that the Study group's cross-sectional area (CSA) fell from baseline (624.19 ± 92.70 mm<sup>2</sup>) to 334.64 ± 46.32 mm<sup>2</sup> after 1 hour and to 217.26 ± 29.90 mm<sup>2</sup> after 2 hours. In the Observation group, the CSA similarly dropped from 620.10 ± 100.73 mm<sup>2</sup> to 331.30 ± 51.19 mm<sup>2</sup> and 214.70 ± 28.73 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i><0.001. CSA was not significantly different between groups, <i>p</i>>0.05. The PP analysis also indicated no significant changes in the CSA between the two groups at 3 time-points, <i>p</i>>0.05. At the first hour, the Study and Observation group had stomach emptying speeds of 300.05 ± 103.74 mm<sup>2</sup>/h and 259.50 ± 125.25 mm<sup>2</sup>/h, respectively, which were greater than those at the second hour (115.75 ± 43.51 mm<sup>2</sup>/h vs 124.36 ± 58.98 mm<sup>2</sup>/h), <i>p</i><0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural analgesia, pharmacological, and non-pharmacological labor analgesia had little effect on gastric emptying, and gastric antrum ultrasonography can be utilized to monitor maternal gastric volume changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/c6/tcrm-19-475.PMC10281523.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gastric Emptying Velocity After Labor Analgesia Assessed by Sonography: A Prospective Controlled Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yongfeng Liu,&nbsp;Qian Wang,&nbsp;Qinghai Zuo\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/TCRM.S410984\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The effect of labor analgesia on gastric emptying rate will affect the management of fasting during the perinatal period. To evaluate gastric emptying after labor analgesia using the gastric antrum ultrasound examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From September 2022 to January 2023, a prospective controlled observational study was conducted. The Study group (epidural analgesia group) and Observation group (pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions group) were successively enrolled and grouped using the random envelope method. However, labor analgesia was supplied according to maternal women's wishes, and intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed to establish its effect on stomach emptying. The gastric emptying rate during the first stage of labor was considered to be the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September 2022 to January 2023, 120 persons were studied, 90 in the Study group and 30 in the Observation group. 33 people's analgesic selection was discordant with the grouped one. ITT analysis showed that the Study group's cross-sectional area (CSA) fell from baseline (624.19 ± 92.70 mm<sup>2</sup>) to 334.64 ± 46.32 mm<sup>2</sup> after 1 hour and to 217.26 ± 29.90 mm<sup>2</sup> after 2 hours. In the Observation group, the CSA similarly dropped from 620.10 ± 100.73 mm<sup>2</sup> to 331.30 ± 51.19 mm<sup>2</sup> and 214.70 ± 28.73 mm<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i><0.001. CSA was not significantly different between groups, <i>p</i>>0.05. The PP analysis also indicated no significant changes in the CSA between the two groups at 3 time-points, <i>p</i>>0.05. At the first hour, the Study and Observation group had stomach emptying speeds of 300.05 ± 103.74 mm<sup>2</sup>/h and 259.50 ± 125.25 mm<sup>2</sup>/h, respectively, which were greater than those at the second hour (115.75 ± 43.51 mm<sup>2</sup>/h vs 124.36 ± 58.98 mm<sup>2</sup>/h), <i>p</i><0.001.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Epidural analgesia, pharmacological, and non-pharmacological labor analgesia had little effect on gastric emptying, and gastric antrum ultrasonography can be utilized to monitor maternal gastric volume changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/06/c6/tcrm-19-475.PMC10281523.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S410984\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S410984","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分娩镇痛对胃排空率的影响将影响围产期禁食的处理。目的:应用胃窦超声检查评价分娩镇痛后胃排空情况。方法:于2022年9月至2023年1月进行前瞻性对照观察研究。实验组(硬膜外镇痛组)和观察组(药物和非药物干预组)分别入组,采用随机包络法进行分组。然而,分娩镇痛是根据产妇的意愿提供的,并进行了意向治疗(ITT)和每个方案(PP)分析,以确定其对胃排空的影响。第一产程的胃排空率被认为是主要指标。结果:从2022年9月到2023年1月,120人被研究,其中研究组90人,观察组30人。33人的镇痛药选择与分组不一致。ITT分析显示,研究组的横截面积(CSA)从基线(624.19±92.70 mm2)下降到1小时后的334.64±46.32 mm2, 2小时后的217.26±29.90 mm2。观察组CSA由620.10±100.73 mm2降至331.30±51.19 mm2和214.70±28.73 mm2, pp>0.05。PP分析也显示两组在3个时间点的CSA无显著变化,p>0.05。研究组和观察组在分娩第1 h时胃排空速度分别为3000.05±103.74 mm2/h和259.50±125.25 mm2/h,均高于分娩第2 h时的排空速度(115.75±43.51 mm2/h vs 124.36±58.98 mm2/h)。结论:硬膜外镇痛、药物及非药物分娩镇痛对胃排空影响不大,胃窦超声可监测产妇胃容积变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gastric Emptying Velocity After Labor Analgesia Assessed by Sonography: A Prospective Controlled Observational Study.

Gastric Emptying Velocity After Labor Analgesia Assessed by Sonography: A Prospective Controlled Observational Study.

Gastric Emptying Velocity After Labor Analgesia Assessed by Sonography: A Prospective Controlled Observational Study.

Objective: The effect of labor analgesia on gastric emptying rate will affect the management of fasting during the perinatal period. To evaluate gastric emptying after labor analgesia using the gastric antrum ultrasound examination.

Methods: From September 2022 to January 2023, a prospective controlled observational study was conducted. The Study group (epidural analgesia group) and Observation group (pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions group) were successively enrolled and grouped using the random envelope method. However, labor analgesia was supplied according to maternal women's wishes, and intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were performed to establish its effect on stomach emptying. The gastric emptying rate during the first stage of labor was considered to be the primary outcome.

Results: From September 2022 to January 2023, 120 persons were studied, 90 in the Study group and 30 in the Observation group. 33 people's analgesic selection was discordant with the grouped one. ITT analysis showed that the Study group's cross-sectional area (CSA) fell from baseline (624.19 ± 92.70 mm2) to 334.64 ± 46.32 mm2 after 1 hour and to 217.26 ± 29.90 mm2 after 2 hours. In the Observation group, the CSA similarly dropped from 620.10 ± 100.73 mm2 to 331.30 ± 51.19 mm2 and 214.70 ± 28.73 mm2, p<0.001. CSA was not significantly different between groups, p>0.05. The PP analysis also indicated no significant changes in the CSA between the two groups at 3 time-points, p>0.05. At the first hour, the Study and Observation group had stomach emptying speeds of 300.05 ± 103.74 mm2/h and 259.50 ± 125.25 mm2/h, respectively, which were greater than those at the second hour (115.75 ± 43.51 mm2/h vs 124.36 ± 58.98 mm2/h), p<0.001.

Conclusion: Epidural analgesia, pharmacological, and non-pharmacological labor analgesia had little effect on gastric emptying, and gastric antrum ultrasonography can be utilized to monitor maternal gastric volume changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信