排放交易计划对中国水泥行业生产技术升级的影响:一个LCA-RCOT模型

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Yiyi Ju , Kiyoshi Fujikawa
{"title":"排放交易计划对中国水泥行业生产技术升级的影响:一个LCA-RCOT模型","authors":"Yiyi Ju ,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Fujikawa","doi":"10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The cement industry in China has been conducting overcapacity elimination through technology upgrading in the past years. Most of the overcapacity elimination policies are in the form of administrative and regulative approaches. However, the cost of overcapacity elimination by implementing command-and-control policies will be increasingly higher, at the same time, the orientation of such technology upgrading remains unknown. Such contradiction creates the necessities to reveal the impact of other policy instruments on the technology upgrading in the cement industry, as well as to clarify the optimal output allocation among all alternative technology choices. In this paper, an LCA-RCOT model (Life Cycle Assessment and Rectangular Choices Of Technologies) is established to provide such optimal technology combination with the constraints from a projected emission trading scheme (ETS). The results show that under an ETS cap with a target of 5% reduction of emission, 10% of subsidy allowances, and one-way linking with another ETS with higher average market price, the optimal solution suggest that 114.5 billion USD of total output in the cement sector should be produced by small dry kilns, while 102.5 billion USD by large dry kilns. In all feasible solutions, the optimal technology combination may shift to fewer shaft kilns and more dry kilns. In the long run, the climate policy instrument, ETS, may promote the upgrading of production technology by decomposing the total emission mitigation costs to the factor inputs of each cement producer.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36714,"journal":{"name":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","volume":"4 ","pages":"Article 100019"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100019","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revealing the impact of a projected emission trading scheme on the production technology upgrading in the cement industry in China: An LCA-RCOT model\",\"authors\":\"Yiyi Ju ,&nbsp;Kiyoshi Fujikawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The cement industry in China has been conducting overcapacity elimination through technology upgrading in the past years. Most of the overcapacity elimination policies are in the form of administrative and regulative approaches. However, the cost of overcapacity elimination by implementing command-and-control policies will be increasingly higher, at the same time, the orientation of such technology upgrading remains unknown. Such contradiction creates the necessities to reveal the impact of other policy instruments on the technology upgrading in the cement industry, as well as to clarify the optimal output allocation among all alternative technology choices. In this paper, an LCA-RCOT model (Life Cycle Assessment and Rectangular Choices Of Technologies) is established to provide such optimal technology combination with the constraints from a projected emission trading scheme (ETS). The results show that under an ETS cap with a target of 5% reduction of emission, 10% of subsidy allowances, and one-way linking with another ETS with higher average market price, the optimal solution suggest that 114.5 billion USD of total output in the cement sector should be produced by small dry kilns, while 102.5 billion USD by large dry kilns. In all feasible solutions, the optimal technology combination may shift to fewer shaft kilns and more dry kilns. In the long run, the climate policy instrument, ETS, may promote the upgrading of production technology by decomposing the total emission mitigation costs to the factor inputs of each cement producer.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X\",\"volume\":\"4 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100019\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.rcrx.2019.100019\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X19300167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590289X19300167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

过去几年,中国水泥行业一直在通过技术升级来消除产能过剩。大部分的去产能政策都是以行政和监管的方式。然而,通过实施命令和控制政策来消除产能过剩的成本将越来越高,同时,这种技术升级的方向仍然未知。这种矛盾使得有必要揭示其他政策工具对水泥行业技术升级的影响,并澄清各种替代技术选择之间的最优产出配置。本文建立了一个LCA-RCOT模型(生命周期评估和技术的矩形选择),以提供这种最优的技术组合与预计排放交易计划(ETS)的约束。结果表明,在碳排放总量减少5%、补贴额度10%、与另一个平均市场价格较高的碳排放交易体系单向挂钩的情况下,最优方案表明,水泥行业的总产出中,小型干窑应生产1145亿美元,大型干窑应生产1025亿美元。在所有可行的方案中,最优的技术组合可能是少立窑多干窑。从长远来看,气候政策工具碳排放交易体系(ETS)可以通过将减排总成本分解为每个水泥生产商的要素投入来促进生产技术的升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revealing the impact of a projected emission trading scheme on the production technology upgrading in the cement industry in China: An LCA-RCOT model

The cement industry in China has been conducting overcapacity elimination through technology upgrading in the past years. Most of the overcapacity elimination policies are in the form of administrative and regulative approaches. However, the cost of overcapacity elimination by implementing command-and-control policies will be increasingly higher, at the same time, the orientation of such technology upgrading remains unknown. Such contradiction creates the necessities to reveal the impact of other policy instruments on the technology upgrading in the cement industry, as well as to clarify the optimal output allocation among all alternative technology choices. In this paper, an LCA-RCOT model (Life Cycle Assessment and Rectangular Choices Of Technologies) is established to provide such optimal technology combination with the constraints from a projected emission trading scheme (ETS). The results show that under an ETS cap with a target of 5% reduction of emission, 10% of subsidy allowances, and one-way linking with another ETS with higher average market price, the optimal solution suggest that 114.5 billion USD of total output in the cement sector should be produced by small dry kilns, while 102.5 billion USD by large dry kilns. In all feasible solutions, the optimal technology combination may shift to fewer shaft kilns and more dry kilns. In the long run, the climate policy instrument, ETS, may promote the upgrading of production technology by decomposing the total emission mitigation costs to the factor inputs of each cement producer.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X
Resources, Conservation and Recycling: X Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信