Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula, Erich Vidal Carvalho, Rodrigo de Souza Vieira, Cristiane Bastos-Netto, Luciana Angélica da Silva de Jesus, Caio Groetaers Stohler, Gustavo Candiá Arantes, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro
{"title":"结构化早期动员方案对危重症患者动员水平和肌肉力量的影响:随机临床试验。","authors":"Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula, Erich Vidal Carvalho, Rodrigo de Souza Vieira, Cristiane Bastos-Netto, Luciana Angélica da Silva de Jesus, Caio Groetaers Stohler, Gustavo Candiá Arantes, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have evaluated the effects of structured early mobilization (EM) protocols on the level of mobilization in critical care patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured EM protocol on the level of mobilization, muscle strength, and the level of activities of daily living (LADL) after intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (U1111-1245-4840) included adults patients who were randomized into two groups: intervention (<i>n</i> = 40) and control (<i>n</i> = 45). The intervention group underwent conventional physiotherapy and structured EM protocols, and the control group underwent conventional physiotherapy. The level of mobilization from 0 (no mobilization) to 5 (walking), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), LADL (Katz Index), and incidence of complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of mobilization from day 1 to day 7 increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < .05). Muscle strength did not change during the protocol in the intervention and control groups {day 1 [effect size (<i>r</i>) = 0.15, <i>p</i> = .161], at ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .145], and after ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .191]}. The LADL did not differ between the intervention and control groups after ICU discharge [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5), <i>p</i> = .702] or 30 days after hospital discharge [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6), <i>p</i> = .945]. The structured EM protocol was safe, and no severe complications were observed during the protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured EM protocol increased the level of mobilization without improving muscle strength and the LADL compared with conventional physiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2004-2013"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a structured early mobilization protocol on the level of mobilization and muscle strength in critical care patients: A randomized clinical trial.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Aparecida Stroppa de Paula, Erich Vidal Carvalho, Rodrigo de Souza Vieira, Cristiane Bastos-Netto, Luciana Angélica da Silva de Jesus, Caio Groetaers Stohler, Gustavo Candiá Arantes, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Bruno Valle Pinheiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Few studies have evaluated the effects of structured early mobilization (EM) protocols on the level of mobilization in critical care patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of a structured EM protocol on the level of mobilization, muscle strength, and the level of activities of daily living (LADL) after intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized clinical trial (U1111-1245-4840) included adults patients who were randomized into two groups: intervention (<i>n</i> = 40) and control (<i>n</i> = 45). The intervention group underwent conventional physiotherapy and structured EM protocols, and the control group underwent conventional physiotherapy. The level of mobilization from 0 (no mobilization) to 5 (walking), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), LADL (Katz Index), and incidence of complications were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of mobilization from day 1 to day 7 increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (<i>p</i> < .05). Muscle strength did not change during the protocol in the intervention and control groups {day 1 [effect size (<i>r</i>) = 0.15, <i>p</i> = .161], at ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .145], and after ICU discharge [<i>r</i> = 0.16, <i>p</i> = .191]}. The LADL did not differ between the intervention and control groups after ICU discharge [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5), <i>p</i> = .702] or 30 days after hospital discharge [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6), <i>p</i> = .945]. The structured EM protocol was safe, and no severe complications were observed during the protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A structured EM protocol increased the level of mobilization without improving muscle strength and the LADL compared with conventional physiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2004-2013\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/7/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2233097","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/7/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of a structured early mobilization protocol on the level of mobilization and muscle strength in critical care patients: A randomized clinical trial.
Background: Few studies have evaluated the effects of structured early mobilization (EM) protocols on the level of mobilization in critical care patients.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of a structured EM protocol on the level of mobilization, muscle strength, and the level of activities of daily living (LADL) after intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital discharge.
Methods: This randomized clinical trial (U1111-1245-4840) included adults patients who were randomized into two groups: intervention (n = 40) and control (n = 45). The intervention group underwent conventional physiotherapy and structured EM protocols, and the control group underwent conventional physiotherapy. The level of mobilization from 0 (no mobilization) to 5 (walking), muscle strength (Medical Research Council scale), LADL (Katz Index), and incidence of complications were evaluated.
Results: The level of mobilization from day 1 to day 7 increased in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < .05). Muscle strength did not change during the protocol in the intervention and control groups {day 1 [effect size (r) = 0.15, p = .161], at ICU discharge [r = 0.16, p = .145], and after ICU discharge [r = 0.16, p = .191]}. The LADL did not differ between the intervention and control groups after ICU discharge [4 (1-6) vs. 3 (1-5), p = .702] or 30 days after hospital discharge [6 (5-6) vs. 6 (5-6), p = .945]. The structured EM protocol was safe, and no severe complications were observed during the protocol.
Conclusion: A structured EM protocol increased the level of mobilization without improving muscle strength and the LADL compared with conventional physiotherapy.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.