通过三个样本揭示媒体多任务处理与注意力之间的联系。

Technology, mind, and behavior Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1037/tmb0000106
Kenneth Rioja, Sezen Cekic, Daphne Bavelier, Susanne Baumgartner
{"title":"通过三个样本揭示媒体多任务处理与注意力之间的联系。","authors":"Kenneth Rioja, Sezen Cekic, Daphne Bavelier, Susanne Baumgartner","doi":"10.1037/tmb0000106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention has been proposed; yet, whether such a link exists remains hotly debated as previous studies found mixed effects. The present study seeks to evaluate the size of this effect taking into account possible variations due to how media multitasking is measured, how sustained attention is assessed, and the origin of the samples. Using an established and a novel, shortened measure for media multitasking, 924 participants were recruited through three different platforms (MTurk, Prolific and university students). In addition to questionnaire- and task-based assessments for sustained attention, impulsivity and sensation seeking were also assessed to further qualify behavioral problems associated with media multitasking. The findings establish a negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention of a medium effect size, whether questionnaires (<i>r</i> =.20) or a task-based measure (<i>r</i> =.21) are used. Importantly, the findings support the notion that previous differences across studies can be at least partly attributed to the choice of media multitasking measure as well as differences across samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":74913,"journal":{"name":"Technology, mind, and behavior","volume":"4 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614709/pdf/EMS176658.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the link between media multitasking and attention across three samples.\",\"authors\":\"Kenneth Rioja, Sezen Cekic, Daphne Bavelier, Susanne Baumgartner\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/tmb0000106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention has been proposed; yet, whether such a link exists remains hotly debated as previous studies found mixed effects. The present study seeks to evaluate the size of this effect taking into account possible variations due to how media multitasking is measured, how sustained attention is assessed, and the origin of the samples. Using an established and a novel, shortened measure for media multitasking, 924 participants were recruited through three different platforms (MTurk, Prolific and university students). In addition to questionnaire- and task-based assessments for sustained attention, impulsivity and sensation seeking were also assessed to further qualify behavioral problems associated with media multitasking. The findings establish a negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention of a medium effect size, whether questionnaires (<i>r</i> =.20) or a task-based measure (<i>r</i> =.21) are used. Importantly, the findings support the notion that previous differences across studies can be at least partly attributed to the choice of media multitasking measure as well as differences across samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology, mind, and behavior\",\"volume\":\"4 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7614709/pdf/EMS176658.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology, mind, and behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology, mind, and behavior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有人提出,媒体多任务处理与持续注意力之间存在负面联系;然而,这种联系是否存在仍存在激烈的争论,因为之前的研究发现了不同的影响。本研究试图评估这种影响的大小,同时考虑到媒体多任务的测量方法、持续注意力的评估方法以及样本来源可能造成的差异。本研究通过三个不同的平台(MTurk、Prolific 和大学生)招募了 924 名参与者,并使用了一种成熟的媒体多任务测量方法和一种新颖、简短的测量方法。除了对持续注意力进行问卷和任务评估外,还对冲动和寻求感觉进行了评估,以进一步确定与媒体多任务相关的行为问题。研究结果表明,无论采用问卷调查(r=.20)还是基于任务的测量(r=.21),媒体多任务处理与持续注意力之间都存在负相关,且影响程度中等。重要的是,研究结果支持这样一种观点,即以往不同研究之间的差异至少部分归因于媒体多任务测量方法的选择以及不同样本之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unravelling the link between media multitasking and attention across three samples.

A negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention has been proposed; yet, whether such a link exists remains hotly debated as previous studies found mixed effects. The present study seeks to evaluate the size of this effect taking into account possible variations due to how media multitasking is measured, how sustained attention is assessed, and the origin of the samples. Using an established and a novel, shortened measure for media multitasking, 924 participants were recruited through three different platforms (MTurk, Prolific and university students). In addition to questionnaire- and task-based assessments for sustained attention, impulsivity and sensation seeking were also assessed to further qualify behavioral problems associated with media multitasking. The findings establish a negative link between media multitasking and sustained attention of a medium effect size, whether questionnaires (r =.20) or a task-based measure (r =.21) are used. Importantly, the findings support the notion that previous differences across studies can be at least partly attributed to the choice of media multitasking measure as well as differences across samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信