对军事人员的部署风险和保护特征及其与心理健康、认知功能和工作表现的关联性进行探索性领域分析。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707
M F Crane, G Hazel, A Kunzelmann, M Kho, D F Gucciardi, T Rigotti, R Kalisch, E Karin
{"title":"对军事人员的部署风险和保护特征及其与心理健康、认知功能和工作表现的关联性进行探索性领域分析。","authors":"M F Crane, G Hazel, A Kunzelmann, M Kho, D F Gucciardi, T Rigotti, R Kalisch, E Karin","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meta-analyses of military deployment involve the exploration of focused associations between predictors and peri and post-deployment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to provide a large-scale and high-level perspective of deployment-related predictors across eight peri and post-deployment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Articles reporting effect sizes for associations between deployment-related features and indices of peri and post-deployment outcomes were selected. Three-hundred and fourteen studies (<i>N </i>= 2,045,067) and 1,893 relevant effects were retained. Deployment features were categorized into themes, mapped across outcomes, and integrated into a big-data visualization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies of military personnel with deployment experience were included. Extracted studies investigated eight possible outcomes reflecting functioning (e.g., post-traumatic stress, burnout). To allow comparability, effects were transformed into a Fisher's <i>Z</i>. Moderation analyses investigating methodological features were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest correlates across outcomes were emotional (e.g., guilt/shame: <i>Z</i> = 0.59 to 1.21) and cognitive processes (e.g., negative appraisals: <i>Z</i> = -0.54 to 0.26), adequate sleep on deployment (<i>Z </i>= -0.28 to - 0.61), motivation (<i>Z </i>= -0.33 to - 0.71), and use of various coping strategies/recovery strategies (<i>Z </i>= -0.25 to - 0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings pointed to interventions that target coping and recovery strategies, and the monitoring of emotional states and cognitive processes post-deployment that may indicate early risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"16-28"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An exploratory domain analysis of deployment risks and protective features and their association to mental health, cognitive functioning and job performance in military personnel.\",\"authors\":\"M F Crane, G Hazel, A Kunzelmann, M Kho, D F Gucciardi, T Rigotti, R Kalisch, E Karin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Meta-analyses of military deployment involve the exploration of focused associations between predictors and peri and post-deployment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to provide a large-scale and high-level perspective of deployment-related predictors across eight peri and post-deployment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Articles reporting effect sizes for associations between deployment-related features and indices of peri and post-deployment outcomes were selected. Three-hundred and fourteen studies (<i>N </i>= 2,045,067) and 1,893 relevant effects were retained. Deployment features were categorized into themes, mapped across outcomes, and integrated into a big-data visualization.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Studies of military personnel with deployment experience were included. Extracted studies investigated eight possible outcomes reflecting functioning (e.g., post-traumatic stress, burnout). To allow comparability, effects were transformed into a Fisher's <i>Z</i>. Moderation analyses investigating methodological features were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The strongest correlates across outcomes were emotional (e.g., guilt/shame: <i>Z</i> = 0.59 to 1.21) and cognitive processes (e.g., negative appraisals: <i>Z</i> = -0.54 to 0.26), adequate sleep on deployment (<i>Z </i>= -0.28 to - 0.61), motivation (<i>Z </i>= -0.33 to - 0.71), and use of various coping strategies/recovery strategies (<i>Z </i>= -0.25 to - 0.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings pointed to interventions that target coping and recovery strategies, and the monitoring of emotional states and cognitive processes post-deployment that may indicate early risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"16-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2228707","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:军事部署的元分析涉及对预测因素与部署前和部署后结果之间关联的重点探索:我们的目的是提供一个大规模、高层次的视角,来研究与部署相关的预测因素在部署前和部署后的八种结果:设计:我们选取了报告部署相关特征与部署前后结果指数之间关联效应大小的文章。保留了 314 项研究(N=2,045,067)和 1,893 项相关效应。将部署特征归类为主题,在结果之间进行映射,并整合到大数据可视化中:方法:纳入对有部署经历的军事人员的研究。所提取的研究调查了反映功能的八种可能结果(如创伤后压力、倦怠)。为了便于比较,将效应转换为费雪 Z:各结果之间最强的相关性是情绪(如内疚/羞愧:Z = 0.59 至 1.21)和认知过程(如负面评价:Z = -0.54 至 0.26)、部署时的充足睡眠(Z = -0.28 至 -0.61)、动机(Z = -0.33 至 -0.71)以及各种应对策略/恢复策略的使用(Z = -0.25 至 -0.59):研究结果表明,应针对应对和恢复策略采取干预措施,并在部署后监测可能预示早期风险的情绪状态和认知过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An exploratory domain analysis of deployment risks and protective features and their association to mental health, cognitive functioning and job performance in military personnel.

Background: Meta-analyses of military deployment involve the exploration of focused associations between predictors and peri and post-deployment outcomes.

Objective: We aimed to provide a large-scale and high-level perspective of deployment-related predictors across eight peri and post-deployment outcomes.

Design: Articles reporting effect sizes for associations between deployment-related features and indices of peri and post-deployment outcomes were selected. Three-hundred and fourteen studies (N = 2,045,067) and 1,893 relevant effects were retained. Deployment features were categorized into themes, mapped across outcomes, and integrated into a big-data visualization.

Methods: Studies of military personnel with deployment experience were included. Extracted studies investigated eight possible outcomes reflecting functioning (e.g., post-traumatic stress, burnout). To allow comparability, effects were transformed into a Fisher's Z. Moderation analyses investigating methodological features were performed.

Results: The strongest correlates across outcomes were emotional (e.g., guilt/shame: Z = 0.59 to 1.21) and cognitive processes (e.g., negative appraisals: Z = -0.54 to 0.26), adequate sleep on deployment (Z = -0.28 to - 0.61), motivation (Z = -0.33 to - 0.71), and use of various coping strategies/recovery strategies (Z = -0.25 to - 0.59).

Conclusions: Findings pointed to interventions that target coping and recovery strategies, and the monitoring of emotional states and cognitive processes post-deployment that may indicate early risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信