心室内4D血流心血管磁共振评价射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者:一项初步研究。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Chi Ting Kwan, On Hang Samuel Ching, Pui Min Yap, Sau Yung Fung, Hok Shing Tang, Wan Wai Vivian Tse, Cheuk Nam Felix Kwan, Yin Hay Phoebe Chow, Nga Ching Yiu, Yung Pok Lee, Jessica Wing Ka Lau, Ambrose Ho Tung Fong, Qing-Wen Ren, Mei-Zhen Wu, Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Ka Chun Kevin Lee, Chun Yu Leung, Andrew Li, David Montero, Varut Vardhanabhuti, Jojo Siu Han Hai, Chung-Wah Siu, Hung-Fat Tse, Valentin Zingan, Xiaoxi Zhao, Haonan Wang, Dudley John Pennell, Raad Mohiaddin, Roxy Senior, Kai-Hang Yiu, Ming-Yen Ng
{"title":"心室内4D血流心血管磁共振评价射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者:一项初步研究。","authors":"Chi Ting Kwan,&nbsp;On Hang Samuel Ching,&nbsp;Pui Min Yap,&nbsp;Sau Yung Fung,&nbsp;Hok Shing Tang,&nbsp;Wan Wai Vivian Tse,&nbsp;Cheuk Nam Felix Kwan,&nbsp;Yin Hay Phoebe Chow,&nbsp;Nga Ching Yiu,&nbsp;Yung Pok Lee,&nbsp;Jessica Wing Ka Lau,&nbsp;Ambrose Ho Tung Fong,&nbsp;Qing-Wen Ren,&nbsp;Mei-Zhen Wu,&nbsp;Eric Yuk Fai Wan,&nbsp;Ka Chun Kevin Lee,&nbsp;Chun Yu Leung,&nbsp;Andrew Li,&nbsp;David Montero,&nbsp;Varut Vardhanabhuti,&nbsp;Jojo Siu Han Hai,&nbsp;Chung-Wah Siu,&nbsp;Hung-Fat Tse,&nbsp;Valentin Zingan,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Zhao,&nbsp;Haonan Wang,&nbsp;Dudley John Pennell,&nbsp;Raad Mohiaddin,&nbsp;Roxy Senior,&nbsp;Kai-Hang Yiu,&nbsp;Ming-Yen Ng","doi":"10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50332,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","volume":" ","pages":"2015-2027"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Chi Ting Kwan,&nbsp;On Hang Samuel Ching,&nbsp;Pui Min Yap,&nbsp;Sau Yung Fung,&nbsp;Hok Shing Tang,&nbsp;Wan Wai Vivian Tse,&nbsp;Cheuk Nam Felix Kwan,&nbsp;Yin Hay Phoebe Chow,&nbsp;Nga Ching Yiu,&nbsp;Yung Pok Lee,&nbsp;Jessica Wing Ka Lau,&nbsp;Ambrose Ho Tung Fong,&nbsp;Qing-Wen Ren,&nbsp;Mei-Zhen Wu,&nbsp;Eric Yuk Fai Wan,&nbsp;Ka Chun Kevin Lee,&nbsp;Chun Yu Leung,&nbsp;Andrew Li,&nbsp;David Montero,&nbsp;Varut Vardhanabhuti,&nbsp;Jojo Siu Han Hai,&nbsp;Chung-Wah Siu,&nbsp;Hung-Fat Tse,&nbsp;Valentin Zingan,&nbsp;Xiaoxi Zhao,&nbsp;Haonan Wang,&nbsp;Dudley John Pennell,&nbsp;Raad Mohiaddin,&nbsp;Roxy Senior,&nbsp;Kai-Hang Yiu,&nbsp;Ming-Yen Ng\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2015-2027\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-023-02909-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用保留射血分数(HFpEF)诊断心力衰竭仍然具有挑战性。心室内四维流(4D流)相位对比心血管磁共振(CMR)可以评估左心室(LV)流的不同成分,包括直接流、延迟射血、保留流入和残余容量。这可用于鉴定HFpEF。本研究调查了脑室内4D流CMR是否可以区分HFpEF患者与非HFpEF和无症状对照。前瞻性招募疑似HFpEF患者和无症状对照者。使用欧洲心脏病学学会(ESC)2021专家建议确认HFpEF患者。如果疑似HFpEF患者不符合ESC 2021标准,则诊断为非HFpEF。从4D血流CMR图像中获得左心室直接血流、延迟射血、保留流入和残余体积。绘制受试者工作特性(ROC)曲线。63名受试者(25名HFpEF患者、22名非HFpEF病人和16名无症状对照者)被纳入本研究。46%为男性,平均年龄69.8岁 ± 9.1年。CMR 4D血流衍生的左心室直接血流和残余容量可以区分HFpEF与非HFpEF和无症状对照组的联合组(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intraventricular 4D flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a pilot study.

Diagnosing heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains challenging. Intraventricular four-dimensional flow (4D flow) phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) can assess different components of left ventricular (LV) flow including direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume. This could be utilised to identify HFpEF. This study investigated if intraventricular 4D flow CMR could differentiate HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls. Suspected HFpEF patients and asymptomatic controls were recruited prospectively. HFpEF patients were confirmed using European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2021 expert recommendations. Non-HFpEF patients were diagnosed if suspected HFpEF patients did not fulfil ESC 2021 criteria. LV direct flow, delayed ejection, retained inflow and residual volume were obtained from 4D flow CMR images. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. 63 subjects (25 HFpEF patients, 22 non-HFpEF patients and 16 asymptomatic controls) were included in this study. 46% were male, mean age 69.8 ± 9.1 years. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume could differentiate HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls (p < 0.001 for both) as well as HFpEF vs non-HFpEF patients (p = 0.021 and p = 0.005, respectively). Among the 4 parameters, direct flow had the largest area under curve (AUC) of 0.781 when comparing HFpEF vs combined group of non-HFpEF and asymptomatic controls, while residual volume had the largest AUC of 0.740 when comparing HFpEF and non-HFpEF patients. CMR 4D flow derived LV direct flow and residual volume show promise in differentiating HFpEF patients from non-HFpEF patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
77
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging publishes technical and clinical communications (original articles, review articles and editorial comments) associated with cardiovascular diseases. The technical communications include the research, development and evaluation of novel imaging methods in the various imaging domains. These domains include magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, X-ray imaging, intravascular imaging, and applications in nuclear cardiology and echocardiography, and any combination of these techniques. Of particular interest are topics in medical image processing and image-guided interventions. Clinical applications of such imaging techniques include improved diagnostic approaches, treatment , prognosis and follow-up of cardiovascular patients. Topics include: multi-center or larger individual studies dealing with risk stratification and imaging utilization, applications for better characterization of cardiovascular diseases, and assessment of the efficacy of new drugs and interventional devices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信