启动肺癌筛查计划的挑战:来自两个退伍军人医疗中心的经验

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Stephen Bujarski , Robert Flowers , Mansour Alkhunaizi , Dave Cuvi , Sneha Sathya , Jennifer Melcher , Farrah Kheradmand , Gregory Holt
{"title":"启动肺癌筛查计划的挑战:来自两个退伍军人医疗中心的经验","authors":"Stephen Bujarski ,&nbsp;Robert Flowers ,&nbsp;Mansour Alkhunaizi ,&nbsp;Dave Cuvi ,&nbsp;Sneha Sathya ,&nbsp;Jennifer Melcher ,&nbsp;Farrah Kheradmand ,&nbsp;Gregory Holt","doi":"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Establishing a lung cancer screening (LCS) program is an important endeavor that delivers life-saving healthcare to an at-risk population. However, developing a comprehensive LCS program requires critical elements including obtaining institutional level buy-in, hiring necessary personnel, developing appropriate infrastructure and actively engaging primary care providers, subspecialty services, and radiology. The process required to connect such services to deliver an organized LCS program that reaches all eligible candidates must be individualized to each institution's needs and infrastructure. Here we provide detailed experiences from two successful LCS programs, one using a primary care provider-based service and the other using a consult-based service. In each case, we provide the pros and cons of each system. We propose that the decision to setup an ideal LCS program could include a hybrid design that combines aspects of each system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21750,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in oncology","volume":"49 3","pages":"Pages 232-240"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009377542200046X/pdfft?md5=56ec504d193c057cbf95c5db99dcd01e&pid=1-s2.0-S009377542200046X-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges in initiating a lung cancer screening program: Experiences from two VA medical centers\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Bujarski ,&nbsp;Robert Flowers ,&nbsp;Mansour Alkhunaizi ,&nbsp;Dave Cuvi ,&nbsp;Sneha Sathya ,&nbsp;Jennifer Melcher ,&nbsp;Farrah Kheradmand ,&nbsp;Gregory Holt\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.06.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Establishing a lung cancer screening (LCS) program is an important endeavor that delivers life-saving healthcare to an at-risk population. However, developing a comprehensive LCS program requires critical elements including obtaining institutional level buy-in, hiring necessary personnel, developing appropriate infrastructure and actively engaging primary care providers, subspecialty services, and radiology. The process required to connect such services to deliver an organized LCS program that reaches all eligible candidates must be individualized to each institution's needs and infrastructure. Here we provide detailed experiences from two successful LCS programs, one using a primary care provider-based service and the other using a consult-based service. In each case, we provide the pros and cons of each system. We propose that the decision to setup an ideal LCS program could include a hybrid design that combines aspects of each system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"volume\":\"49 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 232-240\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009377542200046X/pdfft?md5=56ec504d193c057cbf95c5db99dcd01e&pid=1-s2.0-S009377542200046X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009377542200046X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S009377542200046X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

建立肺癌筛查(LCS)计划是一项重要的努力,为高危人群提供挽救生命的医疗保健。然而,制定一个全面的LCS计划需要一些关键因素,包括获得机构层面的支持,雇用必要的人员,发展适当的基础设施,积极参与初级保健提供者,亚专科服务和放射学。连接这些服务以提供有组织的LCS计划所需的过程必须根据每个机构的需求和基础设施进行个性化。在这里,我们提供两个成功的LCS项目的详细经验,一个使用基于初级保健提供者的服务,另一个使用基于咨询的服务。在每种情况下,我们都提供了每种系统的优点和缺点。我们建议,决定建立一个理想的LCS程序可以包括一个混合设计,结合每个系统的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges in initiating a lung cancer screening program: Experiences from two VA medical centers

Establishing a lung cancer screening (LCS) program is an important endeavor that delivers life-saving healthcare to an at-risk population. However, developing a comprehensive LCS program requires critical elements including obtaining institutional level buy-in, hiring necessary personnel, developing appropriate infrastructure and actively engaging primary care providers, subspecialty services, and radiology. The process required to connect such services to deliver an organized LCS program that reaches all eligible candidates must be individualized to each institution's needs and infrastructure. Here we provide detailed experiences from two successful LCS programs, one using a primary care provider-based service and the other using a consult-based service. In each case, we provide the pros and cons of each system. We propose that the decision to setup an ideal LCS program could include a hybrid design that combines aspects of each system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in oncology
Seminars in oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
104 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology brings you current, authoritative, and practical reviews of developments in the etiology, diagnosis and management of cancer. Each issue examines topics of clinical importance, with an emphasis on providing both the basic knowledge needed to better understand a topic as well as evidence-based opinions from leaders in the field. Seminars in Oncology also seeks to be a venue for sharing a diversity of opinions including those that might be considered "outside the box". We welcome a healthy and respectful exchange of opinions and urge you to approach us with your insights as well as suggestions of topics that you deem worthy of coverage. By helping the reader understand the basic biology and the therapy of cancer as they learn the nuances from experts, all in a journal that encourages the exchange of ideas we aim to help move the treatment of cancer forward.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信