De- kay修复与De Vega缝合治疗功能性三尖瓣反流的比较:初步经验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Piergiorgio Bruno, Maria Grandinetti, Piero Farina, Serena D'Avino, Francesca Graziani, Maria Calabrese, Rosa Lillo, Annalisa Pasquini, Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello, Federico Cammertoni, Marialisa Nesta, Natalia Pavone, Massimo Massetti
{"title":"De- kay修复与De Vega缝合治疗功能性三尖瓣反流的比较:初步经验。","authors":"Piergiorgio Bruno,&nbsp;Maria Grandinetti,&nbsp;Piero Farina,&nbsp;Serena D'Avino,&nbsp;Francesca Graziani,&nbsp;Maria Calabrese,&nbsp;Rosa Lillo,&nbsp;Annalisa Pasquini,&nbsp;Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello,&nbsp;Federico Cammertoni,&nbsp;Marialisa Nesta,&nbsp;Natalia Pavone,&nbsp;Massimo Massetti","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12565-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, restrictive suture annuloplasty (De Vega) for less-than-severe functional tricuspid regurgitation has been proven to be safe and effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether the adjunct of the plication of the posterior tricuspid leaflet with the same running suture (bicuspidized De Vega or \"De Kay\") is equally safe and effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center, retrospective study on patients submitted to suture repair of the tricuspid valve during mitral valve surgery, with either conventional or De Kay, between January 2014 and December 2020. Comparison was based on degree of residual tricuspid valve regurgitation and right ventricular assessment at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the course of the study period, 255 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery had a dilated (>40 mm or >20 mm/m<sup>2</sup>) tricuspid valve annulus, with less-than-severe tricuspid regurgitation. Conventional De Vega was employed in 166 patients (65.1%) and De Kay in the remaining 89 (34.9%). At discharge the adjunct of postero-septal commissure plication has similar outcomes to the classic De Vega repair. It seems to preserve right ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>De Kay repair guarantees the same tricuspidal regurgitation reduction as compared with conventional De Vega early after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of De-Kay repair versus De Vega suture for functional tricuspid regurgitation: a preliminary experience.\",\"authors\":\"Piergiorgio Bruno,&nbsp;Maria Grandinetti,&nbsp;Piero Farina,&nbsp;Serena D'Avino,&nbsp;Francesca Graziani,&nbsp;Maria Calabrese,&nbsp;Rosa Lillo,&nbsp;Annalisa Pasquini,&nbsp;Giovanni Alfonso Chiariello,&nbsp;Federico Cammertoni,&nbsp;Marialisa Nesta,&nbsp;Natalia Pavone,&nbsp;Massimo Massetti\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12565-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, restrictive suture annuloplasty (De Vega) for less-than-severe functional tricuspid regurgitation has been proven to be safe and effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether the adjunct of the plication of the posterior tricuspid leaflet with the same running suture (bicuspidized De Vega or \\\"De Kay\\\") is equally safe and effective.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center, retrospective study on patients submitted to suture repair of the tricuspid valve during mitral valve surgery, with either conventional or De Kay, between January 2014 and December 2020. Comparison was based on degree of residual tricuspid valve regurgitation and right ventricular assessment at discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over the course of the study period, 255 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery had a dilated (>40 mm or >20 mm/m<sup>2</sup>) tricuspid valve annulus, with less-than-severe tricuspid regurgitation. Conventional De Vega was employed in 166 patients (65.1%) and De Kay in the remaining 89 (34.9%). At discharge the adjunct of postero-septal commissure plication has similar outcomes to the classic De Vega repair. It seems to preserve right ventricular function.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>De Kay repair guarantees the same tricuspidal regurgitation reduction as compared with conventional De Vega early after surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12565-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12565-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在接受二尖瓣手术的患者中,限制性缝合环成形术(De Vega)治疗轻度功能性三尖瓣反流已被证明是安全有效的。本研究的目的是确定用相同的行缝线(双尖De Vega或“De Kay”)缝合后三尖瓣小叶是否同样安全有效。方法:2014年1月至2020年12月,对二尖瓣手术中采用常规或De Kay缝合修复三尖瓣的患者进行单中心回顾性研究。比较基于三尖瓣残余返流程度和出院时的右心室评估。结果:在研究期间,255例接受二尖瓣手术的患者出现三尖瓣环扩张(>40 mm或>20 mm/m2),三尖瓣返流不严重。166例(65.1%)采用常规De Vega, 89例(34.9%)采用De Kay。出院时,后间隔闭合分支与经典De Vega修复的结果相似。它似乎保留了右心室功能。结论:术后早期De Kay修复术与常规De Vega修复术相比,可保证相同的三尖瓣返流减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of De-Kay repair versus De Vega suture for functional tricuspid regurgitation: a preliminary experience.

Background: In patients undergoing mitral valve surgery, restrictive suture annuloplasty (De Vega) for less-than-severe functional tricuspid regurgitation has been proven to be safe and effective. The aim of this study is to determine whether the adjunct of the plication of the posterior tricuspid leaflet with the same running suture (bicuspidized De Vega or "De Kay") is equally safe and effective.

Methods: Single center, retrospective study on patients submitted to suture repair of the tricuspid valve during mitral valve surgery, with either conventional or De Kay, between January 2014 and December 2020. Comparison was based on degree of residual tricuspid valve regurgitation and right ventricular assessment at discharge.

Results: Over the course of the study period, 255 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery had a dilated (>40 mm or >20 mm/m2) tricuspid valve annulus, with less-than-severe tricuspid regurgitation. Conventional De Vega was employed in 166 patients (65.1%) and De Kay in the remaining 89 (34.9%). At discharge the adjunct of postero-septal commissure plication has similar outcomes to the classic De Vega repair. It seems to preserve right ventricular function.

Conclusions: De Kay repair guarantees the same tricuspidal regurgitation reduction as compared with conventional De Vega early after surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信