为什么调查暴力激进主义如此困难?

IF 2.9 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY
Ángel Gómez, Alexandra Vázquez, Juana Chinchilla, Laura Blanco, Beatriz Alba, Sandra Chiclana, José Luis González-Álvarez
{"title":"为什么调查暴力激进主义如此困难?","authors":"Ángel Gómez,&nbsp;Alexandra Vázquez,&nbsp;Juana Chinchilla,&nbsp;Laura Blanco,&nbsp;Beatriz Alba,&nbsp;Sandra Chiclana,&nbsp;José Luis González-Álvarez","doi":"10.1017/SJP.2023.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Imagine that you are a researcher interested in disentangling the underlying mechanisms that motivate certain individuals to self-sacrifice for a group or an ideology. Now, visualize that you are one of a few privileged that have the possibility of interviewing people who have been involved in some of the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. What should you do? Most investigations focused on terrorism do not include empirical data and just a handful of fortunate have made face-to-face interviews with these individuals. Therefore, we might conclude that most experts in the field have not directly met the challenge of experiencing studying violent radicalization <i>in person.</i> As members of a research team who have talked with individuals under risk of radicalization, current, and former terrorists, our main goal with this manuscript is to synopsize a series of ten potential barriers that those interested in the subject might find when making fieldwork, and alternatives to solve them. If all the efforts made by investigators could save the life of a potential victim, prevent an individual from becoming radicalized, or make him/her decide to abandon the violence associated with terrorism, all our work will have been worthwhile.</p>","PeriodicalId":54309,"journal":{"name":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","volume":"26 ","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Is It so Difficult to Investigate Violent Radicalization?\",\"authors\":\"Ángel Gómez,&nbsp;Alexandra Vázquez,&nbsp;Juana Chinchilla,&nbsp;Laura Blanco,&nbsp;Beatriz Alba,&nbsp;Sandra Chiclana,&nbsp;José Luis González-Álvarez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/SJP.2023.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Imagine that you are a researcher interested in disentangling the underlying mechanisms that motivate certain individuals to self-sacrifice for a group or an ideology. Now, visualize that you are one of a few privileged that have the possibility of interviewing people who have been involved in some of the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. What should you do? Most investigations focused on terrorism do not include empirical data and just a handful of fortunate have made face-to-face interviews with these individuals. Therefore, we might conclude that most experts in the field have not directly met the challenge of experiencing studying violent radicalization <i>in person.</i> As members of a research team who have talked with individuals under risk of radicalization, current, and former terrorists, our main goal with this manuscript is to synopsize a series of ten potential barriers that those interested in the subject might find when making fieldwork, and alternatives to solve them. If all the efforts made by investigators could save the life of a potential victim, prevent an individual from becoming radicalized, or make him/her decide to abandon the violence associated with terrorism, all our work will have been worthwhile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"e7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spanish Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spanish Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

想象一下,你是一名研究人员,对解开激励某些个人为群体或意识形态做出自我牺牲的潜在机制感兴趣。现在,想象一下,你是少数几个有特权的人之一,你有可能采访那些参与了历史上一些最引人注目的恐怖袭击的人。你应该怎么做?大多数针对恐怖主义的调查都不包括经验数据,只有少数幸运者与这些人进行了面对面的采访。因此,我们可以得出结论,该领域的大多数专家都没有直接遇到亲自研究暴力激进化的挑战。作为一个研究小组的成员,他们与激进化风险下的个人,现任和前任恐怖分子进行了交谈,我们的主要目标是概述对该主题感兴趣的人在进行实地调查时可能会发现的一系列十个潜在障碍,以及解决这些障碍的替代方案。如果调查人员所做的一切努力能够挽救一个潜在受害者的生命,防止一个人变得激进,或者使他/她决定放弃与恐怖主义有关的暴力,那么我们所有的工作都是值得的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Is It so Difficult to Investigate Violent Radicalization?

Imagine that you are a researcher interested in disentangling the underlying mechanisms that motivate certain individuals to self-sacrifice for a group or an ideology. Now, visualize that you are one of a few privileged that have the possibility of interviewing people who have been involved in some of the most dramatic terrorist attacks in history. What should you do? Most investigations focused on terrorism do not include empirical data and just a handful of fortunate have made face-to-face interviews with these individuals. Therefore, we might conclude that most experts in the field have not directly met the challenge of experiencing studying violent radicalization in person. As members of a research team who have talked with individuals under risk of radicalization, current, and former terrorists, our main goal with this manuscript is to synopsize a series of ten potential barriers that those interested in the subject might find when making fieldwork, and alternatives to solve them. If all the efforts made by investigators could save the life of a potential victim, prevent an individual from becoming radicalized, or make him/her decide to abandon the violence associated with terrorism, all our work will have been worthwhile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Spanish Journal of Psychology
Spanish Journal of Psychology Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Spanish Journal of Psychology is published with the aim of promoting the international dissemination of relevant empirical research and theoretical and methodological proposals in the various areas of specialization within psychology. The first Spanish journal with an international scope published entirely in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信