安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他男男性行为者不使用艾滋病暴露前预防措施的原因及可能促进其接受的策略:一项横断面调查。

CMAJ open Pub Date : 2023-06-27 Print Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20220113
Oscar Javier Pico-Espinosa, Mark Hull, Paul MacPherson, Daniel Grace, Nathan Lachowsky, Mark Gaspar, Saira Mohammed, Robinson Truong, Darrell H S Tan
{"title":"安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省男同性恋者、双性恋者及其他男男性行为者不使用艾滋病暴露前预防措施的原因及可能促进其接受的策略:一项横断面调查。","authors":"Oscar Javier Pico-Espinosa, Mark Hull, Paul MacPherson, Daniel Grace, Nathan Lachowsky, Mark Gaspar, Saira Mohammed, Robinson Truong, Darrell H S Tan","doi":"10.9778/cmajo.20220113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized. We aimed to identify barriers to use of PrEP and strategies that may facilitate its uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, aged 19 years or older and living in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada, completed a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020. Participants who met Canadian PrEP guideline criteria and were not already using PrEP identified relevant barriers and which strategies would make them more likely to start PrEP. We described the barriers and strategies separately for Ontario and BC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1527 survey responses, 260 respondents who never used PrEP and met criteria for PrEP were included. In Ontario, the most common barriers were affordability (43%) and concern about adverse effects (42%). In BC, the most common reasons were concern about adverse effects (41%) and not feeling at high enough risk (36%). In Ontario, preferred strategies were short waiting time (63%), the health care provider informing about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (62%), and a written step-by-step guide (60%). In BC, strategies were short waiting time (68%), people speaking publicly about PrEP (68%), and the health care provider counselling about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (64%), adverse effects of PrEP (65%) and how well PrEP works (62%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Concern about adverse effects and not self-identifying as having high risk for HIV were common barriers, and shorter waiting times may increase PrEP uptake. In Ontario, the findings suggested lack of affordability, whereas in BC, strategies involving health care providers were valued.</p>","PeriodicalId":10432,"journal":{"name":"CMAJ open","volume":"11 3","pages":"E560-E568"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/44/cmajo.20220113.PMC10310342.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reasons for not using pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV and strategies that may facilitate uptake in Ontario and British Columbia among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional survey.\",\"authors\":\"Oscar Javier Pico-Espinosa, Mark Hull, Paul MacPherson, Daniel Grace, Nathan Lachowsky, Mark Gaspar, Saira Mohammed, Robinson Truong, Darrell H S Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.9778/cmajo.20220113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized. We aimed to identify barriers to use of PrEP and strategies that may facilitate its uptake.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, aged 19 years or older and living in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada, completed a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020. Participants who met Canadian PrEP guideline criteria and were not already using PrEP identified relevant barriers and which strategies would make them more likely to start PrEP. We described the barriers and strategies separately for Ontario and BC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1527 survey responses, 260 respondents who never used PrEP and met criteria for PrEP were included. In Ontario, the most common barriers were affordability (43%) and concern about adverse effects (42%). In BC, the most common reasons were concern about adverse effects (41%) and not feeling at high enough risk (36%). In Ontario, preferred strategies were short waiting time (63%), the health care provider informing about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (62%), and a written step-by-step guide (60%). In BC, strategies were short waiting time (68%), people speaking publicly about PrEP (68%), and the health care provider counselling about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (64%), adverse effects of PrEP (65%) and how well PrEP works (62%).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Concern about adverse effects and not self-identifying as having high risk for HIV were common barriers, and shorter waiting times may increase PrEP uptake. In Ontario, the findings suggested lack of affordability, whereas in BC, strategies involving health care providers were valued.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10432,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CMAJ open\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"E560-E568\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b8/44/cmajo.20220113.PMC10310342.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CMAJ open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CMAJ open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20220113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:艾滋病暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)的使用率很低。我们的目的是找出使用 PrEP 的障碍以及促进其使用的策略:2019-2020年,居住在加拿大安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省、年龄在19岁或以上的男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者完成了一项横断面调查。符合加拿大 PrEP 指南标准且尚未使用 PrEP 的参与者指出了相关障碍,以及哪些策略会使他们更有可能开始使用 PrEP。我们分别描述了安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省的障碍和策略:在 1527 份调查回复中,260 名从未使用过 PrEP 但符合 PrEP 标准的受访者被纳入其中。在安大略省,最常见的障碍是负担不起(43%)和担心不良反应(42%)。在不列颠哥伦比亚省,最常见的原因是担心不良反应(41%)和感觉风险不够高(36%)。在安大略省,首选的策略是等待时间短(63%)、医疗服务提供者告知他们感染艾滋病毒的风险高于预期(62%),以及书面的分步骤指南(60%)。在不列颠哥伦比亚省,首选策略是等待时间短(68%)、人们公开谈论 PrEP(68%)、医疗服务提供者告知其感染艾滋病毒的风险高于预期(64%)、PrEP 的不良影响(65%)以及 PrEP 的效果如何(62%):解释:担心不良影响和不自认是艾滋病毒高危人群是常见的障碍,缩短等待时间可能会提高 PrEP 的使用率。在安大略省,研究结果表明人们负担不起,而在不列颠哥伦比亚省,涉及医疗服务提供者的策略受到重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reasons for not using pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV and strategies that may facilitate uptake in Ontario and British Columbia among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional survey.

Reasons for not using pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV and strategies that may facilitate uptake in Ontario and British Columbia among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional survey.

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV is underutilized. We aimed to identify barriers to use of PrEP and strategies that may facilitate its uptake.

Methods: Gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men, aged 19 years or older and living in Ontario and British Columbia, Canada, completed a cross-sectional survey in 2019-2020. Participants who met Canadian PrEP guideline criteria and were not already using PrEP identified relevant barriers and which strategies would make them more likely to start PrEP. We described the barriers and strategies separately for Ontario and BC.

Results: Of 1527 survey responses, 260 respondents who never used PrEP and met criteria for PrEP were included. In Ontario, the most common barriers were affordability (43%) and concern about adverse effects (42%). In BC, the most common reasons were concern about adverse effects (41%) and not feeling at high enough risk (36%). In Ontario, preferred strategies were short waiting time (63%), the health care provider informing about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (62%), and a written step-by-step guide (60%). In BC, strategies were short waiting time (68%), people speaking publicly about PrEP (68%), and the health care provider counselling about their HIV risk being higher than perceived (64%), adverse effects of PrEP (65%) and how well PrEP works (62%).

Interpretation: Concern about adverse effects and not self-identifying as having high risk for HIV were common barriers, and shorter waiting times may increase PrEP uptake. In Ontario, the findings suggested lack of affordability, whereas in BC, strategies involving health care providers were valued.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信