德尔福关于新脂肪肝命名法的多社会共识声明。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Mary E. Rinella , Jeffrey V. Lazarus , Vlad Ratziu , Sven M. Francque , Arun J. Sanyal , Fasiha Kanwal , Diana Romero , Manal F. Abdelmalek , Quentin M. Anstee , Juan Pablo Arab , Marco Arrese , Ramon Bataller , Ulrich Beuers , Jerome Boursier , Elisabetta Bugianesi , Christopher D. Byrne , Graciela E. Castro Narro , Abhijit Chowdhury , Helena Cortez-Pinto , Donna R. Cryer , Philip N. Newsome
{"title":"德尔福关于新脂肪肝命名法的多社会共识声明。","authors":"Mary E. Rinella ,&nbsp;Jeffrey V. Lazarus ,&nbsp;Vlad Ratziu ,&nbsp;Sven M. Francque ,&nbsp;Arun J. Sanyal ,&nbsp;Fasiha Kanwal ,&nbsp;Diana Romero ,&nbsp;Manal F. Abdelmalek ,&nbsp;Quentin M. Anstee ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Arab ,&nbsp;Marco Arrese ,&nbsp;Ramon Bataller ,&nbsp;Ulrich Beuers ,&nbsp;Jerome Boursier ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Bugianesi ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Byrne ,&nbsp;Graciela E. Castro Narro ,&nbsp;Abhijit Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Helena Cortez-Pinto ,&nbsp;Donna R. Cryer ,&nbsp;Philip N. Newsome","doi":"10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic” and “fatty” were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7979,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepatology","volume":"29 1","pages":"Article 101133"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268123002375/pdfft?md5=547d0e77f52151a3ded8b040c2dcced8&pid=1-s2.0-S1665268123002375-main.pdf","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature\",\"authors\":\"Mary E. Rinella ,&nbsp;Jeffrey V. Lazarus ,&nbsp;Vlad Ratziu ,&nbsp;Sven M. Francque ,&nbsp;Arun J. Sanyal ,&nbsp;Fasiha Kanwal ,&nbsp;Diana Romero ,&nbsp;Manal F. Abdelmalek ,&nbsp;Quentin M. Anstee ,&nbsp;Juan Pablo Arab ,&nbsp;Marco Arrese ,&nbsp;Ramon Bataller ,&nbsp;Ulrich Beuers ,&nbsp;Jerome Boursier ,&nbsp;Elisabetta Bugianesi ,&nbsp;Christopher D. Byrne ,&nbsp;Graciela E. Castro Narro ,&nbsp;Abhijit Chowdhury ,&nbsp;Helena Cortez-Pinto ,&nbsp;Donna R. Cryer ,&nbsp;Philip N. Newsome\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aohep.2023.101133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic” and “fatty” were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268123002375/pdfft?md5=547d0e77f52151a3ded8b040c2dcced8&pid=1-s2.0-S1665268123002375-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268123002375\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1665268123002375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

引言:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)和非酒精性脂性肝炎(NASH)这两个术语的主要局限性是依赖于排斥性混杂术语和使用潜在的污名化语言。这项研究旨在确定内容专家和患者权益倡导者是否赞成更改命名和/或定义。方法:由三个大型的全国性肝脏协会领导一个改进的德尔菲过程。共识被先验地定义为绝对多数(67%)的投票。命名过程之外的一个独立专家委员会就首字母缩写及其诊断标准提出了最终建议。结果:共有来自56个国家的236名小组成员参加了四次在线调查和两次混合会议。4轮调查的回复率分别为87%、83%、83%和78%。74%的受访者认为目前的命名法有足够的缺陷,可以考虑改名。61%和66%的受访者认为“不含酒精”和“含脂肪”这两个词是污名化的。脂肪变性肝病(SLD)被选为涵盖脂肪变性各种病因的总体术语。脂肪性肝炎一词被认为是一个重要的病理生理学概念,应该保留。取代NAFLD的名称是代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)。一致认为应改变定义,将五种心脏代谢危险因素中至少一种因素纳入其中。那些没有代谢参数也没有已知病因的患者被认为患有隐性SLD。选择了一个新的类别,即纯MASLD之外的MetALD,来描述那些每周饮酒量较大的MASLD患者(女性和男性分别为140至350克/周和210至420克/周)。结论:新的命名法和诊断标准得到了广泛支持,没有污名化,可以提高意识和患者识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multisociety Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature

The principal limitations of the terms NAFLD and NASH are the reliance on exclusionary confounder terms and the use of potentially stigmatising language. This study set out to determine if content experts and patient advocates were in favor of a change in nomenclature and/or definition. A modified Delphi process was led by three large pan-national liver associations. The consensus was defined a priori as a supermajority (67%) vote. An independent committee of experts external to the nomenclature process made the final recommendation on the acronym and its diagnostic criteria. A total of 236 panelists from 56 countries participated in 4 online surveys and 2 hybrid meetings. Response rates across the 4 survey rounds were 87%, 83%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. Seventy-four percent of respondents felt that the current nomenclature was sufficiently flawed to consider a name change. The terms “nonalcoholic” and “fatty” were felt to be stigmatising by 61% and 66% of respondents, respectively. Steatotic liver disease was chosen as an overarching term to encompass the various aetiologies of steatosis. The term steatohepatitis was felt to be an important pathophysiological concept that should be retained. The name chosen to replace NAFLD was metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease. There was consensus to change the definition to include the presence of at least 1 of 5 cardiometabolic risk factors. Those with no metabolic parameters and no known cause were deemed to have cryptogenic steatotic liver disease. A new category, outside pure metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, termed metabolic and alcohol related/associated liver disease (MetALD), was selected to describe those with metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease, who consume greater amounts of alcohol per week (140–350 g/wk and 210–420 g/wk for females and males, respectively). The new nomenclature and diagnostic criteria are widely supported and nonstigmatising, and can improve awareness and patient identification.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of hepatology
Annals of hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.60%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Hepatology publishes original research on the biology and diseases of the liver in both humans and experimental models. Contributions may be submitted as regular articles. The journal also publishes concise reviews of both basic and clinical topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信