树脂水泥和热循环对研磨二硅酸锂陶瓷微剪切粘结强度的影响。

Eloisa Ac Paloco, Sandrine B Berger, Murilo B Lopes, Jaqueline C Favaro, Alcides Gonini-Júnior, Allan If Piauilino, Alexandre M Borba, Ricardo D Guiraldo
{"title":"树脂水泥和热循环对研磨二硅酸锂陶瓷微剪切粘结强度的影响。","authors":"Eloisa Ac Paloco,&nbsp;Sandrine B Berger,&nbsp;Murilo B Lopes,&nbsp;Jaqueline C Favaro,&nbsp;Alcides Gonini-Júnior,&nbsp;Allan If Piauilino,&nbsp;Alexandre M Borba,&nbsp;Ricardo D Guiraldo","doi":"10.54589/aol.34/3/226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of different resin cements to CAD/CAM-created lithium disilicate ceramics after 24 hours and after 1 year (10,000 thermocycles). Forty (40) ceramic bars were subjected to pretreatment comprising airborne abrasion with aluminum oxide particles, etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid and Monobond N application. Bars were divided into 4 groups (n = 10), based on cement type: light-cured Variolink Esthetic LC (VLC) and dual-cured Variolink N (VN) at two different times: after 24 hours and after 1 year. Silicone molds were used to prepare cement cylinders on a ceramic surface. The set was stored in distilled water at 37ºC, for 24 hours or subjected to 10,000 thermocycles. The molds were removed and microshear bond strength was tested. Data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Based on the comparison between cement values at different aging times (p = 0.035), VN after 24 hours (27.10 ± 0.92) and after 1 year (20.62 ± 1.25) presented significantly higher values than VLC after 24 hours (14.79 ± 0.76) and after 1 year (6.61 ± 0.81). Bond strength recorded for both cements after 24 hours (VN: 27.10 ± 0.92 and VLC: 14.79 ± 0.76) was significantly higher than the one recorded after 1 year (VN: 20.62 ± 1.25 and VLC: 6.61 ± 0.81). The thermocycling reduced the values observed for both investigated cements; bond strength was greater for dual-cure resin cement than for light-cured resin cement.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/a8/1852-4834-34-3-226.PMC10315074.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of resin cement and thermocycling on milled lithium disilicate ceramic microshear bond strength.\",\"authors\":\"Eloisa Ac Paloco,&nbsp;Sandrine B Berger,&nbsp;Murilo B Lopes,&nbsp;Jaqueline C Favaro,&nbsp;Alcides Gonini-Júnior,&nbsp;Allan If Piauilino,&nbsp;Alexandre M Borba,&nbsp;Ricardo D Guiraldo\",\"doi\":\"10.54589/aol.34/3/226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of different resin cements to CAD/CAM-created lithium disilicate ceramics after 24 hours and after 1 year (10,000 thermocycles). Forty (40) ceramic bars were subjected to pretreatment comprising airborne abrasion with aluminum oxide particles, etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid and Monobond N application. Bars were divided into 4 groups (n = 10), based on cement type: light-cured Variolink Esthetic LC (VLC) and dual-cured Variolink N (VN) at two different times: after 24 hours and after 1 year. Silicone molds were used to prepare cement cylinders on a ceramic surface. The set was stored in distilled water at 37ºC, for 24 hours or subjected to 10,000 thermocycles. The molds were removed and microshear bond strength was tested. Data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Based on the comparison between cement values at different aging times (p = 0.035), VN after 24 hours (27.10 ± 0.92) and after 1 year (20.62 ± 1.25) presented significantly higher values than VLC after 24 hours (14.79 ± 0.76) and after 1 year (6.61 ± 0.81). Bond strength recorded for both cements after 24 hours (VN: 27.10 ± 0.92 and VLC: 14.79 ± 0.76) was significantly higher than the one recorded after 1 year (VN: 20.62 ± 1.25 and VLC: 6.61 ± 0.81). The thermocycling reduced the values observed for both investigated cements; bond strength was greater for dual-cure resin cement than for light-cured resin cement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/70/a8/1852-4834-34-3-226.PMC10315074.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.34/3/226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.34/3/226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究的目的是比较不同树脂水泥与CAD/ cam制造的二硅酸锂陶瓷在24小时和1年后(10,000热循环)的微剪切结合强度。四十(40)个陶瓷棒进行了预处理,包括用氧化铝颗粒空气摩擦、用10%氢氟酸蚀刻和应用Monobond N。根据水泥类型分为4组(n = 10):光固化Variolink美学LC (VLC)和双固化Variolink n (VN),分别在24小时和1年后两个不同的时间。用硅胶模具在陶瓷表面制备水泥圆筒。在37ºC的蒸馏水中保存24小时或进行10,000次热循环。取出模具,测试微剪切粘结强度。数据进行双向方差分析和Tukey检验(α = 0.05)。不同龄期水泥值比较(p = 0.035),龄期24小时VN值(27.10±0.92)和1年后VN值(20.62±1.25)显著高于龄期24小时VLC值(14.79±0.76)和龄期1年VLC值(6.61±0.81)。两种骨水泥24 h后的粘结强度(VN: 27.10±0.92,VLC: 14.79±0.76)明显高于1年后的VN: 20.62±1.25,VLC: 6.61±0.81)。热循环降低了两种水泥的观测值;双固化树脂水泥的粘结强度高于光固化树脂水泥。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of resin cement and thermocycling on milled lithium disilicate ceramic microshear bond strength.

Influence of resin cement and thermocycling on milled lithium disilicate ceramic microshear bond strength.

Influence of resin cement and thermocycling on milled lithium disilicate ceramic microshear bond strength.

Influence of resin cement and thermocycling on milled lithium disilicate ceramic microshear bond strength.

The aim of this study was to compare the microshear bond strength of different resin cements to CAD/CAM-created lithium disilicate ceramics after 24 hours and after 1 year (10,000 thermocycles). Forty (40) ceramic bars were subjected to pretreatment comprising airborne abrasion with aluminum oxide particles, etching with 10% hydrofluoric acid and Monobond N application. Bars were divided into 4 groups (n = 10), based on cement type: light-cured Variolink Esthetic LC (VLC) and dual-cured Variolink N (VN) at two different times: after 24 hours and after 1 year. Silicone molds were used to prepare cement cylinders on a ceramic surface. The set was stored in distilled water at 37ºC, for 24 hours or subjected to 10,000 thermocycles. The molds were removed and microshear bond strength was tested. Data were submitted to two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Based on the comparison between cement values at different aging times (p = 0.035), VN after 24 hours (27.10 ± 0.92) and after 1 year (20.62 ± 1.25) presented significantly higher values than VLC after 24 hours (14.79 ± 0.76) and after 1 year (6.61 ± 0.81). Bond strength recorded for both cements after 24 hours (VN: 27.10 ± 0.92 and VLC: 14.79 ± 0.76) was significantly higher than the one recorded after 1 year (VN: 20.62 ± 1.25 and VLC: 6.61 ± 0.81). The thermocycling reduced the values observed for both investigated cements; bond strength was greater for dual-cure resin cement than for light-cured resin cement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信