新型冠状病毒肺炎对当前眼科在线教育范围及课程的影响

Patrick S Y Lee, Pavlina S Kemp, Lisa D Kelly, Jamie B Rosenberg, JoAnn A Giaconi, Emily B Graubart, Daniel W Knoch, Rukhsana G Mirza, Prithvi S Sankar, Anju Goyal
{"title":"新型冠状病毒肺炎对当前眼科在线教育范围及课程的影响","authors":"Patrick S Y Lee,&nbsp;Pavlina S Kemp,&nbsp;Lisa D Kelly,&nbsp;Jamie B Rosenberg,&nbsp;JoAnn A Giaconi,&nbsp;Emily B Graubart,&nbsp;Daniel W Knoch,&nbsp;Rukhsana G Mirza,&nbsp;Prithvi S Sankar,&nbsp;Anju Goyal","doi":"10.1055/s-0041-1735955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Abrupt changes in ophthalmology education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in novel online curriculum development. The aims of this study were to identify (1) the scope of online curricula implemented both prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) perception of educators on these online modalities; and (3) early lessons from online implementation that may guide future curricular planning. <b>Methods</b>  Implementation of online curricula was evaluated by using a national online survey of Ophthalmology Directors of Medical Student Education (DMSE) via Qualtrics software. <b>Participants</b>  Medical Student Educators of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) were surveyed. <b>Results</b>  Fifty responses were collected, representing a 64.9% response rate. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 44% of institutions had no online components in their courses, but 78.3% of institutions reported increasing online components in response to the pandemic. Required courses were significantly associated both with having implemented online components before the pandemic and implementing online-only versions of these courses in response to the pandemic. The three most popular modalities used for online teaching were lectures, interactive cases, and problem-based learning, with a median satisfaction of 4.0, 4.32, and 4.35, (out of five) respectively. The least popular modalities used were online teaching of physical exam skills and telemedicine, both with a median satisfaction of 2.5. Median overall educator satisfaction with online teaching was four (out of five). The most common weakness related to online teaching was the lack of effective physical exam skills training. <b>Conclusion</b>  Our data demonstrate that most institutions successfully shifted their ophthalmology curriculum to a virtual and online version in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DMSEs adapted quickly, transitioning in-person clinical courses, and extracurricular activities to online formats. Overall, educator satisfaction with online curricula was high. Integration of online curricula provides the opportunity to enrich institutional curriculums and overcome limitations imposed by decreasing curriculum time. This study reveals an early window into the utilization, strengths, and weaknesses of online ophthalmology education, which can serve as a guiding point to enhance ophthalmology curriculum development.</p>","PeriodicalId":73579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","volume":"13 2","pages":"e163-e169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/7c/10-1055-s-0041-1735955.PMC9928069.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Scope of Online Ophthalmology Education and Curriculum Impact Due to COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick S Y Lee,&nbsp;Pavlina S Kemp,&nbsp;Lisa D Kelly,&nbsp;Jamie B Rosenberg,&nbsp;JoAnn A Giaconi,&nbsp;Emily B Graubart,&nbsp;Daniel W Knoch,&nbsp;Rukhsana G Mirza,&nbsp;Prithvi S Sankar,&nbsp;Anju Goyal\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0041-1735955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  Abrupt changes in ophthalmology education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in novel online curriculum development. The aims of this study were to identify (1) the scope of online curricula implemented both prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) perception of educators on these online modalities; and (3) early lessons from online implementation that may guide future curricular planning. <b>Methods</b>  Implementation of online curricula was evaluated by using a national online survey of Ophthalmology Directors of Medical Student Education (DMSE) via Qualtrics software. <b>Participants</b>  Medical Student Educators of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) were surveyed. <b>Results</b>  Fifty responses were collected, representing a 64.9% response rate. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 44% of institutions had no online components in their courses, but 78.3% of institutions reported increasing online components in response to the pandemic. Required courses were significantly associated both with having implemented online components before the pandemic and implementing online-only versions of these courses in response to the pandemic. The three most popular modalities used for online teaching were lectures, interactive cases, and problem-based learning, with a median satisfaction of 4.0, 4.32, and 4.35, (out of five) respectively. The least popular modalities used were online teaching of physical exam skills and telemedicine, both with a median satisfaction of 2.5. Median overall educator satisfaction with online teaching was four (out of five). The most common weakness related to online teaching was the lack of effective physical exam skills training. <b>Conclusion</b>  Our data demonstrate that most institutions successfully shifted their ophthalmology curriculum to a virtual and online version in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DMSEs adapted quickly, transitioning in-person clinical courses, and extracurricular activities to online formats. Overall, educator satisfaction with online curricula was high. Integration of online curricula provides the opportunity to enrich institutional curriculums and overcome limitations imposed by decreasing curriculum time. This study reveals an early window into the utilization, strengths, and weaknesses of online ophthalmology education, which can serve as a guiding point to enhance ophthalmology curriculum development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"volume\":\"13 2\",\"pages\":\"e163-e169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/bc/7c/10-1055-s-0041-1735955.PMC9928069.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735955\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of academic ophthalmology (2017)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735955","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的新型冠状病毒感染症(COVID-19)大流行引起的眼科教育的急剧变化,促使眼科在线课程的发展。本研究的目的是确定(1)在COVID-19大流行之前和期间实施的在线课程的范围;(2)教育工作者对这些在线模式的看法;(3)在线实施的早期经验教训可能指导未来的课程规划。方法采用qualics软件对全国眼科医学生教育主任(DMSE)进行在线调查,对在线课程的实施情况进行评估。调查对象为眼科大学教授协会医学生教育工作者。结果共收集问卷50份,回复率64.9%。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之前,44%的机构在其课程中没有在线内容,但78.3%的机构表示,为应对疫情,增加了在线内容。必修课程与在大流行之前实施在线内容以及为应对大流行而实施这些课程的纯在线版本显著相关。三种最流行的在线教学模式是讲座、互动案例和基于问题的学习,满意度的中位数分别为4.0、4.32和4.35(满分为5分)。最不受欢迎的方式是在线教授体检技能和远程医疗,两者的满意度中位数均为2.5。教育工作者对在线教学的总体满意度中位数为4分(满分5分)。在线教学最常见的弱点是缺乏有效的体检技能培训。我们的数据表明,为应对COVID-19大流行,大多数机构成功地将其眼科课程转变为虚拟和在线版本。dmse适应得很快,将面对面的临床课程和课外活动转变为在线形式。总体而言,教育工作者对在线课程的满意度很高。在线课程的整合提供了丰富机构课程的机会,并克服了减少课程时间所带来的限制。本研究初步揭示了眼科在线教育的利用、优势和不足,可为加强眼科课程开发提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Current Scope of Online Ophthalmology Education and Curriculum Impact Due to COVID-19.

Current Scope of Online Ophthalmology Education and Curriculum Impact Due to COVID-19.

Objective  Abrupt changes in ophthalmology education caused by the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in novel online curriculum development. The aims of this study were to identify (1) the scope of online curricula implemented both prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) perception of educators on these online modalities; and (3) early lessons from online implementation that may guide future curricular planning. Methods  Implementation of online curricula was evaluated by using a national online survey of Ophthalmology Directors of Medical Student Education (DMSE) via Qualtrics software. Participants  Medical Student Educators of the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) were surveyed. Results  Fifty responses were collected, representing a 64.9% response rate. Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, 44% of institutions had no online components in their courses, but 78.3% of institutions reported increasing online components in response to the pandemic. Required courses were significantly associated both with having implemented online components before the pandemic and implementing online-only versions of these courses in response to the pandemic. The three most popular modalities used for online teaching were lectures, interactive cases, and problem-based learning, with a median satisfaction of 4.0, 4.32, and 4.35, (out of five) respectively. The least popular modalities used were online teaching of physical exam skills and telemedicine, both with a median satisfaction of 2.5. Median overall educator satisfaction with online teaching was four (out of five). The most common weakness related to online teaching was the lack of effective physical exam skills training. Conclusion  Our data demonstrate that most institutions successfully shifted their ophthalmology curriculum to a virtual and online version in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. DMSEs adapted quickly, transitioning in-person clinical courses, and extracurricular activities to online formats. Overall, educator satisfaction with online curricula was high. Integration of online curricula provides the opportunity to enrich institutional curriculums and overcome limitations imposed by decreasing curriculum time. This study reveals an early window into the utilization, strengths, and weaknesses of online ophthalmology education, which can serve as a guiding point to enhance ophthalmology curriculum development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信