收入在制度正当性中的作用。

IF 1.1 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Elena R Agadullina
{"title":"收入在制度正当性中的作用。","authors":"Elena R Agadullina","doi":"10.11621/pir.2023.0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>System justification theory asserts that people's motivation to defend, justify, and maintain the status quo depends on their socio-economic status. At the same time practically nothing is known about the mediators for the relationship between a person's income and his adherence to system justification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the role of income in motivating an individual to justify the system, taking into account as potential mediators of this relationship his sense of control over life and level of life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In an online study (N = 410), a double sequential mediation model was tested, with an individual's income as an independent variable, his/her system justification as a dependent variable, and his/her perceived control over life and level of life satisfaction as mediators. The impact of education was controlled by inserting it into the model as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that people with low incomes justify the system more than people with high incomes do. At the same time, there was a positive indirect effect of income on system justification, indicating that, compared to people with low incomes, those with high incomes had a more pronounced sense of control over their lives, which contributed to an increase in their level of life satisfaction, and was positively associated with justification of the status quo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results are discussed in terms of differences in the palliative function of system justification for individuals of different socio-economic status.</p>","PeriodicalId":44621,"journal":{"name":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","volume":"16 1","pages":"66-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294271/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Income in System Justification.\",\"authors\":\"Elena R Agadullina\",\"doi\":\"10.11621/pir.2023.0104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>System justification theory asserts that people's motivation to defend, justify, and maintain the status quo depends on their socio-economic status. At the same time practically nothing is known about the mediators for the relationship between a person's income and his adherence to system justification.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify the role of income in motivating an individual to justify the system, taking into account as potential mediators of this relationship his sense of control over life and level of life satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In an online study (N = 410), a double sequential mediation model was tested, with an individual's income as an independent variable, his/her system justification as a dependent variable, and his/her perceived control over life and level of life satisfaction as mediators. The impact of education was controlled by inserting it into the model as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated that people with low incomes justify the system more than people with high incomes do. At the same time, there was a positive indirect effect of income on system justification, indicating that, compared to people with low incomes, those with high incomes had a more pronounced sense of control over their lives, which contributed to an increase in their level of life satisfaction, and was positively associated with justification of the status quo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results are discussed in terms of differences in the palliative function of system justification for individuals of different socio-economic status.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"66-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10294271/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2023.0104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology in Russia-State of the Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2023.0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:制度正当化理论认为,人们捍卫、正当化和维持现状的动机取决于他们的社会经济地位。与此同时,对于一个人的收入与其遵守制度正当性之间关系的中介因素,人们几乎一无所知。目的:本研究的目的是澄清收入在激励个人为制度辩护方面的作用,考虑到他对生活的控制感和生活满意度水平作为这种关系的潜在中介。设计:在一项在线研究(N = 410)中,测试了双序列中介模型,以个人收入为自变量,他/她的制度正当性为因变量,他/她对生活的感知控制和生活满意度水平为中介。通过将教育作为协变量插入模型,控制了教育的影响。结果:结果表明,低收入人群比高收入人群更能证明该制度的合理性。与此同时,收入对制度正当性存在积极的间接影响,表明与低收入者相比,高收入者对自己的生活有更明显的控制感,这有助于提高他们的生活满意度,并与维持现状的正当性呈正相关。结论:从不同社会经济地位的个体对制度正当性的姑息功能差异的角度探讨了研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Income in System Justification.

Background: System justification theory asserts that people's motivation to defend, justify, and maintain the status quo depends on their socio-economic status. At the same time practically nothing is known about the mediators for the relationship between a person's income and his adherence to system justification.

Objective: The aim of this study was to clarify the role of income in motivating an individual to justify the system, taking into account as potential mediators of this relationship his sense of control over life and level of life satisfaction.

Design: In an online study (N = 410), a double sequential mediation model was tested, with an individual's income as an independent variable, his/her system justification as a dependent variable, and his/her perceived control over life and level of life satisfaction as mediators. The impact of education was controlled by inserting it into the model as a covariate.

Results: The results demonstrated that people with low incomes justify the system more than people with high incomes do. At the same time, there was a positive indirect effect of income on system justification, indicating that, compared to people with low incomes, those with high incomes had a more pronounced sense of control over their lives, which contributed to an increase in their level of life satisfaction, and was positively associated with justification of the status quo.

Conclusion: The results are discussed in terms of differences in the palliative function of system justification for individuals of different socio-economic status.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art
Psychology in Russia-State of the Art PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.10%
发文量
11
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2008, the Russian Psychological Society''s Journal «Psychology in Russia: State of the Art» publishes original research on all aspects of general psychology including cognitive, clinical, developmental, social, neuropsychology, psychophysiology, psychology of labor and ergonomics, and methodology of psychological science. Journal''s list of authors comprises prominent scientists, practitioners and experts from leading Russian universities, research institutions, state ministries and private practice. Addressing current challenges of psychology, it also reviews developments in novel areas such as security, sport, and art psychology, as well as psychology of negotiations, cyberspace and virtual reality. The journal builds upon theoretical foundations laid by the works of Vygotsky, Luria and other Russian scientists whose works contributed to shaping the psychological science worldwide, and welcomes international submissions which make major contributions across the range of psychology, especially appreciating the ones conducted in the paradigm of the Russian psychological tradition. It enjoys a wide international readership and features reports of empirical studies, book reviews and theoretical contributions, which aim to further our understanding of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信