经动脉化疗栓塞药物洗脱珠与射频消融治疗单个小肝癌的比较:一项非随机试验

Tae Hoon Kim, Na Hye Kim, Jin Dong Kim, Young Nam Kim, Yu Jin Kim, Eun Jung Kim, Ki Deok Yoo, Choong Heon Ryu, Ha Hun Song, Hyun Kim
{"title":"经动脉化疗栓塞药物洗脱珠与射频消融治疗单个小肝癌的比较:一项非随机试验","authors":"Tae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Na Hye Kim,&nbsp;Jin Dong Kim,&nbsp;Young Nam Kim,&nbsp;Yu Jin Kim,&nbsp;Eun Jung Kim,&nbsp;Ki Deok Yoo,&nbsp;Choong Heon Ryu,&nbsp;Ha Hun Song,&nbsp;Hyun Kim","doi":"10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (<i>P</i>=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4-102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (<i>P</i>=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (<i>P</i>=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible.</p>","PeriodicalId":16226,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Liver Cancer","volume":"21 2","pages":"146-154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/b9/jlc-2021-05-20.PMC10035690.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial.\",\"authors\":\"Tae Hoon Kim,&nbsp;Na Hye Kim,&nbsp;Jin Dong Kim,&nbsp;Young Nam Kim,&nbsp;Yu Jin Kim,&nbsp;Eun Jung Kim,&nbsp;Ki Deok Yoo,&nbsp;Choong Heon Ryu,&nbsp;Ha Hun Song,&nbsp;Hyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (<i>P</i>=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4-102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (<i>P</i>=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (<i>P</i>=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Liver Cancer\",\"volume\":\"21 2\",\"pages\":\"146-154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1d/b9/jlc-2021-05-20.PMC10035690.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Liver Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17998/jlc.2021.05.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景/目的:手术切除、移植和射频消融(RFA)是小肝细胞癌(HCC)普遍接受的可行治疗方法。近年来,药物洗脱珠(DEB)被引入到经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)中,具有许多治疗优势。本研究的目的是评价DEB-TACE与RFA治疗单发小肝癌的可行性和安全性。方法:在这项前瞻性非随机试验中,我们评估了40例接受debtace (n=21)或RFA (n=19)治疗单个小(最大尺寸≤3厘米)HCC的患者的回顾性数据。主要结果是肿瘤反应和复发时间。次要结果是治疗相关并发症。结果:首次随访评估后,DEB-TACE和RFA的完全缓解率分别为90.5%和94.7% (P=1.000)。平均随访87.6个月(95%可信区间74.4 ~ 102),局部复发7例。debtace组6个月和12个月累积局部复发率分别为5.0%和21.8%,RFA组分别为11.1%和17.0% (P=0.877)。DEB-TACE组12个月和24个月累积远端肝内复发率分别为20.6%和42.7%,RFA组分别为17.2%和36.3% (P=0.844)。2例患者在deba - tace术后出现坏疽性胆囊炎,需要胆囊切除术作为治疗相关不良事件。结论:单次DEB-TACE和RFA治疗后的肿瘤反应和复发率相似。如果其他治疗方式不可行的情况下,DEB-TACE可以选择性地应用于单发小肝癌患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial.

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial.

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial.

Transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting bead compared with radiofrequency ablation for treatment of single small hepatocellular carcinoma: a pilot non-randomized trial.

Background/aims: Surgical resection, transplantation, and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are generally accepted as amenable treatments for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently drug-eluting beads (DEB) which had several treatment advantages were introduced for transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility and safety of DEB-TACE compared with RFA for the treatment of single small HCC.

Methods: In this pilot non-randomized trial, we assessed retrospective data of 40 patients who underwent DEB-TACE (n=21) or RFA (n=19) for single small (≤3 centimeter in greatest dimension) HCC. The primary outcomes were tumor response and time to recurrence. The secondary outcome was treatment-related complications.

Results: Complete response rate to DEB-TACE and RFA after first follow-up assessment was 90.5% and 94.7%, respectively (P=1.000). During mean follow-up of 87.6 months (95% confidence interval, 74.4-102), 7 patients experienced local recurrence. The 6- and 12-month cumulative local recurrence rate was 5.0% and 21.8% in DEB-TACE vs. 11.1% and 17.0% in RFA group (P=0.877). A total 14 distant intrahepatic recurrences were developed and 12- and 24-month cumulative distant intrahepatic recurrence rate was 20.6% and 42.7% in DEB-TACE vs. 17.2% and 36.3% in RFA group (P=0.844). Two patients experienced gangrenous cholecystitis after DEB-TACE requiring cholecystectomy as treatment-related adverse event.

Conclusions: Tumor response and recurrence rate after single session of DEB-TACE or RFA were similar. DEB-TACE could be applied selectively in patients with a single small HCC if the other therapeutic modality is unfeasible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信