慢性肢体缺血患者股骨动脉内膜切除术后远端血运重建的预测因素。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Khaled I Alnahhal, Hassan Dehaini, Ahmed A Sorour, Priyam Vyas, Maryana Chumakova, James Bena, Lee Kirksey
{"title":"慢性肢体缺血患者股骨动脉内膜切除术后远端血运重建的预测因素。","authors":"Khaled I Alnahhal,&nbsp;Hassan Dehaini,&nbsp;Ahmed A Sorour,&nbsp;Priyam Vyas,&nbsp;Maryana Chumakova,&nbsp;James Bena,&nbsp;Lee Kirksey","doi":"10.1177/15385744231154084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify the clinical variables which are predictive for the benefit of concomitant distal revascularization (DR) to prevent Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) progression and the need for major limb amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with lower limb ischemia and required at least femoral endarterectomy (FEA), recruited over a period of 15 years (2002-2016). The patient cohort was divided into three groups based on the type of intervention: A (FEA alone), B (FEA + catheter-based intervention/(CBI)), and C (FEA + surgical bypass (SB)). The primary endpoint was to identify independent predictors for the use of concomitant DR (CBI or SB). Secondary endpoints were amputation rate, length of stay, mortality rate, postoperative ankle-brachial index and complications, readmission rate, re-intervention rate, resolution of symptoms and wound status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 patients were included, 68.0% were males. Most presenting limbs were at Rutherford class (RC) III and WIfI stage 2, with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of .47 ± .21 and a TASC II class C lesion. No significant differences were found in the primary-assisted and secondary patency rates between the three groups (<i>P</i> > .05, in all). In the multivariate analyses, clinical variables associated with DR were hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1-2.2), TASC II D (HR 2.62), Rutherford class 4 (HR 2.3) and 5 (HR 3.7), as well as WIfI stage ≥3 (HR 1.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Femoral endarterectomy is sufficient to treat intermittent claudication. However, patients in whom rest pain, tissue loss or TASC II D anatomic lesion severity are present may benefit from concomitant distal revascularization. Taking into consideration the overall assessment of operative risk factors for each individual patient, proceduralists should have a lower threshold for performing early or concomitant distal revascularization to reduce CLTI progression including additional tissue loss and/or major limb amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors for Distal Revascularization Following Femoral Endarterectomy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Khaled I Alnahhal,&nbsp;Hassan Dehaini,&nbsp;Ahmed A Sorour,&nbsp;Priyam Vyas,&nbsp;Maryana Chumakova,&nbsp;James Bena,&nbsp;Lee Kirksey\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744231154084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to identify the clinical variables which are predictive for the benefit of concomitant distal revascularization (DR) to prevent Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) progression and the need for major limb amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with lower limb ischemia and required at least femoral endarterectomy (FEA), recruited over a period of 15 years (2002-2016). The patient cohort was divided into three groups based on the type of intervention: A (FEA alone), B (FEA + catheter-based intervention/(CBI)), and C (FEA + surgical bypass (SB)). The primary endpoint was to identify independent predictors for the use of concomitant DR (CBI or SB). Secondary endpoints were amputation rate, length of stay, mortality rate, postoperative ankle-brachial index and complications, readmission rate, re-intervention rate, resolution of symptoms and wound status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 400 patients were included, 68.0% were males. Most presenting limbs were at Rutherford class (RC) III and WIfI stage 2, with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of .47 ± .21 and a TASC II class C lesion. No significant differences were found in the primary-assisted and secondary patency rates between the three groups (<i>P</i> > .05, in all). In the multivariate analyses, clinical variables associated with DR were hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1-2.2), TASC II D (HR 2.62), Rutherford class 4 (HR 2.3) and 5 (HR 3.7), as well as WIfI stage ≥3 (HR 1.48).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Femoral endarterectomy is sufficient to treat intermittent claudication. However, patients in whom rest pain, tissue loss or TASC II D anatomic lesion severity are present may benefit from concomitant distal revascularization. Taking into consideration the overall assessment of operative risk factors for each individual patient, proceduralists should have a lower threshold for performing early or concomitant distal revascularization to reduce CLTI progression including additional tissue loss and/or major limb amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231154084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231154084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定预测伴随远端血运重建术(DR)预防慢性肢体威胁缺血(CLTI)进展和需要截肢的临床变量。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,招募了15年(2002-2016)期间出现下肢缺血并至少需要行股动脉内膜切除术(FEA)的患者。根据干预类型将患者队列分为三组:A(单独FEA), B (FEA +导管介入/(CBI))和C (FEA +手术旁路(SB))。主要终点是确定合并DR (CBI或SB)使用的独立预测因子。次要终点为截肢率、住院时间、死亡率、术后踝肱指数和并发症、再入院率、再干预率、症状缓解和伤口状况。结果:共纳入400例患者,男性占68.0%。多数表现为Rutherford (RC) III级和WIfI 2期,踝臂指数(ABI)为0.47±0.21,TASC II C级病变。三组间首次辅助和二次通畅率均无显著差异(P > 0.05)。在多因素分析中,与DR相关的临床变量为高脂血症(风险比(HR) 2.1-2.2)、TASC II D (HR 2.62)、Rutherford 4级(HR 2.3)和5级(HR 3.7),以及WIfI分期≥3 (HR 1.48)。结论:股动脉内膜切除术足以治疗间歇性跛行。然而,存在静息性疼痛、组织丢失或TASCⅱD解剖损伤严重程度的患者可能受益于伴随的远端血运重建术。考虑到对每位患者的手术危险因素的总体评估,手术医生应该有一个较低的阈值来进行早期或伴随的远端血运重建术,以减少CLTI的进展,包括额外的组织损失和/或主要肢体截肢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors for Distal Revascularization Following Femoral Endarterectomy in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Patients.

Objective: This study aims to identify the clinical variables which are predictive for the benefit of concomitant distal revascularization (DR) to prevent Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) progression and the need for major limb amputation.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who presented with lower limb ischemia and required at least femoral endarterectomy (FEA), recruited over a period of 15 years (2002-2016). The patient cohort was divided into three groups based on the type of intervention: A (FEA alone), B (FEA + catheter-based intervention/(CBI)), and C (FEA + surgical bypass (SB)). The primary endpoint was to identify independent predictors for the use of concomitant DR (CBI or SB). Secondary endpoints were amputation rate, length of stay, mortality rate, postoperative ankle-brachial index and complications, readmission rate, re-intervention rate, resolution of symptoms and wound status.

Results: A total of 400 patients were included, 68.0% were males. Most presenting limbs were at Rutherford class (RC) III and WIfI stage 2, with an ankle-brachial index (ABI) of .47 ± .21 and a TASC II class C lesion. No significant differences were found in the primary-assisted and secondary patency rates between the three groups (P > .05, in all). In the multivariate analyses, clinical variables associated with DR were hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio (HR) 2.1-2.2), TASC II D (HR 2.62), Rutherford class 4 (HR 2.3) and 5 (HR 3.7), as well as WIfI stage ≥3 (HR 1.48).

Conclusions: Femoral endarterectomy is sufficient to treat intermittent claudication. However, patients in whom rest pain, tissue loss or TASC II D anatomic lesion severity are present may benefit from concomitant distal revascularization. Taking into consideration the overall assessment of operative risk factors for each individual patient, proceduralists should have a lower threshold for performing early or concomitant distal revascularization to reduce CLTI progression including additional tissue loss and/or major limb amputation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery SURGERY-PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
132
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信