暴露回顾性队列研究:帕博西尼联合芳香酶抑制剂治疗晚期乳腺癌的有效性:对临床实践的影响

Filipa Alves da Costa, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Adriana Ramos, Alexandra Mayer, Claudia Brito, Catarina Ramos, Catarina Bernardo, Mariane Cossito, Cláudia Furtado, Arlindo R Ferreira, Diogo Martins-Branco, Ana da Costa Miranda, António Lourenço
{"title":"暴露回顾性队列研究:帕博西尼联合芳香酶抑制剂治疗晚期乳腺癌的有效性:对临床实践的影响","authors":"Filipa Alves da Costa, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Adriana Ramos, Alexandra Mayer, Claudia Brito, Catarina Ramos, Catarina Bernardo, Mariane Cossito, Cláudia Furtado, Arlindo R Ferreira, Diogo Martins-Branco, Ana da Costa Miranda, António Lourenço","doi":"10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to  adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9283,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research : BCR","volume":"25 1","pages":"78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.\",\"authors\":\"Filipa Alves da Costa, Fábio Cardoso Borges, Adriana Ramos, Alexandra Mayer, Claudia Brito, Catarina Ramos, Catarina Bernardo, Mariane Cossito, Cláudia Furtado, Arlindo R Ferreira, Diogo Martins-Branco, Ana da Costa Miranda, António Lourenço\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to  adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Data suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research : BCR\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10308630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research : BCR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research : BCR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01678-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部晚期或转移性乳腺癌的新药除了增加医疗保健系统的成本外,还带来了临床效益。目前的卫生技术评估(HTA)融资模式优先考虑真实世界的数据。作为正在进行的HTA的一部分,本研究旨在评估palbociclib与芳香酶抑制剂(AI)的有效性,并将其与PALOMA-2报告的疗效进行比较。方法:进行了一项基于人群的回顾性暴露队列研究,包括所有在葡萄牙开始接受palbociclib早期使用并在国家肿瘤登记处注册的患者。主要终点为无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结局包括到帕博西尼失效的时间(TPF)、总生存期(OS)、到下一次治疗的时间(TTNT)和因不良事件(ae)而停止治疗的患者比例。采用Kaplan-Meier法,计算中位、1年和2年生存率,双侧95%可信区间(95% ci)。加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)指南用于报告观察性研究。结果:共纳入131例患者。中位随访时间28.3个月(IQR: 22.7-35.2),中位治疗时间17.5个月(IQR: 7.8-29.1)。中位PFS为19.5个月(95%CI 14.2-24.2),对应1年PFS率为67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2), 2年PFS率为42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3)。敏感性分析显示,当排除未按推荐剂量开始治疗的患者时,中位PFS略有增加,上升至19.8个月(95%CI 14.4-28.9)。通过仅考虑符合PALOMA-2标准的患者,我们可以观察到治疗结果的主要差异,平均PFS为28.8个月(95%CI 19.4-36.0)。TPF为19.8个月(95%CI 14.2-24.9)。中位OS未达到。中位TTNT为22.5个月(95%CI 18.0-29.8)。共有14例(10.7%)患者因不良事件停用帕博西尼。结论:数据显示,在与PALOMA-2有重叠特征的患者中,palbociclib与AI的有效性为28.8个月。然而,当在这些资格标准之外使用时,即预后较差的患者(例如,存在内脏疾病),即使仍然有利,其益处也较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.

Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.

Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.

Effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in an exposure retrospective cohort study: implications for clinical practice.

Background: New drugs for locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer have led to clinical benefits, aside with increasing costs to healthcare systems. The current financing model for health technology assessment (HTA) privileges real-world data. As part of the ongoing HTA, this study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of palbociclib with aromatase inhibitors (AI) and compare it with the efficacy reported in PALOMA-2.

Methods: A population-based retrospective exposure cohort study was conducted including all patients initiating treatment in Portugal with palbociclib under early access use and registered in the National Oncology Registry. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes considered included time to palbociclib failure (TPF), overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT), and proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to  adverse events (AEs). The Kaplan-Meier method was used and median, 1- and 2-year survival rates were computed, with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines for reporting observational studies were used.

Results: There were 131 patients included. Median follow-up was 28.3 months (IQR: 22.7-35.2) and median duration of treatment was 17.5 months (IQR: 7.8-29.1). Median PFS was 19.5 months (95%CI 14.2-24.2), corresponding to a 1-year PFS rate of 67.9% (95%CI 59.2-75.2) and a 2-year PFS rate of 42.0% (95%CI 33.5-50.3). Sensitivity analysis showed median PFS would increase slightly when excluding those not initiating treatment with the recommended dose, raising to 19.8 months (95%CI 14.4-28.9). By considering only patients meeting PALOMA-2 criteria, we could observe a major difference in treatment outcomes, with a mean PFS of 28.8 months (95%CI 19.4-36.0). TPF was 19.8 months (95%CI 14.2-24.9). Median OS was not reached. Median TTNT was 22.5 months (95%CI 18.0-29.8). A total of 14 patients discontinued palbociclib because of AEs (10.7%).

Conclusions: Data suggest palbociclib with AI to have an effectiveness of 28.8 months, when used in patients with overlapping characteristics to those used in PALOMA-2. However, when used outside of these eligibility criteria, namely in patients with less favorable prognosis (e.g., presence of visceral disease), the benefits are inferior, even though still favorable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信