一种定位意外保留手术利器的新装置的多阶段临床前评估:一项概念验证研究。

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Hae Sung Kang, Jad Khoraki, Jessie Gie, Dielle Duval, Susan Haynes, Michael Siev, Jay Shah, Fernando Kim, Martin Mangino, Levi Procter, Riccardo Autorino, Samuel Weprin
{"title":"一种定位意外保留手术利器的新装置的多阶段临床前评估:一项概念验证研究。","authors":"Hae Sung Kang,&nbsp;Jad Khoraki,&nbsp;Jessie Gie,&nbsp;Dielle Duval,&nbsp;Susan Haynes,&nbsp;Michael Siev,&nbsp;Jay Shah,&nbsp;Fernando Kim,&nbsp;Martin Mangino,&nbsp;Levi Procter,&nbsp;Riccardo Autorino,&nbsp;Samuel Weprin","doi":"10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a \"never event\" that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device (\"Melzi Sharps Finder®\" or MSF) in effective detection of RSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of MSF in this study's RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":"17 1","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131432/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study.\",\"authors\":\"Hae Sung Kang,&nbsp;Jad Khoraki,&nbsp;Jessie Gie,&nbsp;Dielle Duval,&nbsp;Susan Haynes,&nbsp;Michael Siev,&nbsp;Jay Shah,&nbsp;Fernando Kim,&nbsp;Martin Mangino,&nbsp;Levi Procter,&nbsp;Riccardo Autorino,&nbsp;Samuel Weprin\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a \\\"never event\\\" that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device (\\\"Melzi Sharps Finder®\\\" or MSF) in effective detection of RSS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of MSF in this study's RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10131432/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-023-00359-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:手术利器残留(RSS)是一种“从未发生过的事件”,尽管计数正确,x线阴性,但仍可能发生。本研究评估了一种新型设备(“Melzi Sharps Finder®”或MSF)在有效检测RSS方面的可行性。方法:第一项研究包括在离体模型(腹腔镜训练箱中装有干草的容器)中测定RSS的存在或识别RSS。第二项研究包括在活体模型(成年约克郡猪的腹腔镜检查)中测定RSS的存在,分为三组:c -臂、c -臂加MSF和MSF。第三项研究采用与剖腹手术相似的器械,包括人工搜索和MSF两组。结果:在第一项研究中,与对照组相比,MSF组对针的识别率更高,定位针的时间更短(98.1%对22.0%),p结论:在本研究的RSS模型中使用MSF有助于确定针的存在和定位,表现为针的识别率增加,识别时间缩短,确定针的存在的准确性更高。该设备可以与放射照相结合使用,因为它在搜索RSS期间为用户提供实时视觉和听觉反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study.

Multiphase preclinical assessment of a novel device to locate unintentionally retained surgical sharps: a proof-of-concept study.

Background: Retained surgical sharps (RSS) is a "never event" that is preventable but may still occur despite of correct count and negative X-ray. This study assesses the feasibility of a novel device ("Melzi Sharps Finder®" or MSF) in effective detection of RSS.

Methods: The first study consisted of determination of the presence of RSS or identification of RSS in an ex-vivo model (a container with hay in a laparoscopic trainer box). The second study consisted of determining presence of RSS in an in-vivo model (laparoscopy in live adult Yorkshire pigs) with 3 groups: C-arm, C-arm with MSF and MSF. The third study used similar apparatus though with laparotomy and included 2 groups: manual search and MSF.

Results: In the first study, the MSF group had a higher rate of identification of a needle and decreased time to locate a needle versus control (98.1% vs. 22.0%, p < 0.001; 1.64 min ± 1.12vs. 3.34 min ± 1.28, p < 0.001). It also had increased accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision (100% vs. 58.8%, p < 0.001; 1.69 min ± 1.43 vs. 4.89 min ± 0.63, p < 0.001). In-the second study, the accuracy of determining the presence of a needle and time to reach this decision were comparable in each group (88.9% vs. 100% vs. 84.5%, p < 0.49; 2.2 min ± 2.2 vs. 2.7 min ± 2.1vs. 2.8 min ± 1.7, p = 0.68). In the third study, MSF group had higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle and decreased time to reach this decision than the control (97.0% vs. 46.7%, p < 0.001; 2.0 min ± 1.5 vs. 3.9 min ± 1.4; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that MSF use was independently associated with an accurate determination of the presence of a needle (OR 12.1, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The use of MSF in this study's RSS models facilitated the determination of presence and localization of RSS as shown by the increased rate of identification of a needle, decreased time to identification and higher accuracy in determining the presence of a needle. This device may be used in conjunction with radiography as it gives live visual and auditory feedback for users during the search for RSS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信