原发性高血压患者的MMP-2和sTNF-R1变异性:1年随访研究

Núria Carpena, Esther Roselló-Lletí, Jose R Calabuig, Estefanía Tarazón, Jose R González-Juanatey, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Antonio Salvador, Lilian Grigorian, Plácido Orosa, Manuel Portolés, Miguel Rivera
{"title":"原发性高血压患者的MMP-2和sTNF-R1变异性:1年随访研究","authors":"Núria Carpena,&nbsp;Esther Roselló-Lletí,&nbsp;Jose R Calabuig,&nbsp;Estefanía Tarazón,&nbsp;Jose R González-Juanatey,&nbsp;Luis Martínez-Dolz,&nbsp;Antonio Salvador,&nbsp;Lilian Grigorian,&nbsp;Plácido Orosa,&nbsp;Manuel Portolés,&nbsp;Miguel Rivera","doi":"10.5402/2012/501894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":73519,"journal":{"name":"ISRN cardiology","volume":"2012 ","pages":"501894"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/501894","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study.\",\"authors\":\"Núria Carpena,&nbsp;Esther Roselló-Lletí,&nbsp;Jose R Calabuig,&nbsp;Estefanía Tarazón,&nbsp;Jose R González-Juanatey,&nbsp;Luis Martínez-Dolz,&nbsp;Antonio Salvador,&nbsp;Lilian Grigorian,&nbsp;Plácido Orosa,&nbsp;Manuel Portolés,&nbsp;Miguel Rivera\",\"doi\":\"10.5402/2012/501894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ISRN cardiology\",\"volume\":\"2012 \",\"pages\":\"501894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5402/2012/501894\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ISRN cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISRN cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究的目的是在12个月的随访中分析稳定期高血压患者的MMP-2和sTNF-R1变异性,这是心血管事件的有效预测因子。对252例原发性高血压患者中的234例(年龄60±13岁,其中男性136例)进行随访。在基线和12个月后(I期)测量MMP-2和sTNF-R1。为了比较MMP-2和sTNF-R1随时间间隔的水平,我们使用Bland-Altman统计方法。在我们的患者中,MMP-2和sTNF-R1在两个区间的重现性良好,再现系数分别为8.2%和11.3%。在平均值1.96 ×标准差范围内的患者比例分别为93.6%和92.7%。MMP-2的基础期与ⅰ期的相关系数升高(r = 0.55, P < 0.0001), sTNF-R1的相关系数升高(r = 0.75, P < 0.0001)。在一项对稳定期高血压患者的随访研究中,MMP-2和sTNF-R1水平具有良好的稳定性。因此,评估其浓度可能是监测这些患者随访的有用工具。测量的MMP-2和sTNF-R1水平的变化,分别超过8.2%和11.3%,可能表明心血管风险增加,因此,可用于优化治疗,而不是单独控制血压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study.

The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信