经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术与儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验。

Q3 Medicine
Edoardo Bindi, Fabiano Nino, Francesco Pierangeli, Michele Ilari, Taisia Bollettini, Elisa Chiarella, Francesca Mariscoli, Gianluca Gentilucci, Alba Cruccetti, Giovanni Cobellis
{"title":"经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术与儿童腹腔镜阑尾切除术:单中心经验。","authors":"Edoardo Bindi,&nbsp;Fabiano Nino,&nbsp;Francesco Pierangeli,&nbsp;Michele Ilari,&nbsp;Taisia Bollettini,&nbsp;Elisa Chiarella,&nbsp;Francesca Mariscoli,&nbsp;Gianluca Gentilucci,&nbsp;Alba Cruccetti,&nbsp;Giovanni Cobellis","doi":"10.4081/pmc.2023.306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LPSA) is the first choice for appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Trans-Umbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy (TULAA) is another used technique. We compared both these procedures used for the treatment of acute appendicitis. The study was conducted between January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: LPSA and TULAA groups. The collected data were: operative time, number of conversions, time of canalization and hospital stay. A total of 181 patients were included: 73 were kept in the LPSA and 108 in the TULAA group. Mean operative time was 70.9 minutes (range 45-130 min) for LPS and 56.4 (30-145 min) for TULAA group (p <0.0001). Complications rate showed no statistically significant difference between both the two groups. However, conversions showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.04). Both techniques showed similar results. TULAA technique takes a significantly shorter operating time. The selection between LPSA and TULAA techniques depends on the experience of the surgeon's work and the personal laparoscopic learning curve. In our experience LPSA was a useful technique to improve the laparoscopic skill of the pediatric surgery residents.</p>","PeriodicalId":35535,"journal":{"name":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy <em>versus</em> laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a single center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Bindi,&nbsp;Fabiano Nino,&nbsp;Francesco Pierangeli,&nbsp;Michele Ilari,&nbsp;Taisia Bollettini,&nbsp;Elisa Chiarella,&nbsp;Francesca Mariscoli,&nbsp;Gianluca Gentilucci,&nbsp;Alba Cruccetti,&nbsp;Giovanni Cobellis\",\"doi\":\"10.4081/pmc.2023.306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LPSA) is the first choice for appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Trans-Umbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy (TULAA) is another used technique. We compared both these procedures used for the treatment of acute appendicitis. The study was conducted between January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: LPSA and TULAA groups. The collected data were: operative time, number of conversions, time of canalization and hospital stay. A total of 181 patients were included: 73 were kept in the LPSA and 108 in the TULAA group. Mean operative time was 70.9 minutes (range 45-130 min) for LPS and 56.4 (30-145 min) for TULAA group (p <0.0001). Complications rate showed no statistically significant difference between both the two groups. However, conversions showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.04). Both techniques showed similar results. TULAA technique takes a significantly shorter operating time. The selection between LPSA and TULAA techniques depends on the experience of the surgeon's work and the personal laparoscopic learning curve. In our experience LPSA was a useful technique to improve the laparoscopic skill of the pediatric surgery residents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2023.306\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/pmc.2023.306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LPSA)是小儿外科阑尾切除术的首选方法。经脐腹腔镜辅助阑尾切除术(TULAA)是另一种常用技术。我们比较了两种治疗急性阑尾炎的方法。该研究于2019年1月至2020年12月进行。患者分为LPSA组和TULAA组。收集的数据包括:手术时间、转诊次数、通管时间和住院时间。共纳入181例患者:LPSA组73例,TULAA组108例。LPS组平均手术时间为70.9分钟(45 ~ 130分钟),TULAA组平均手术时间为56.4分钟(30 ~ 145分钟)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus laparoscopic appendectomy in children: a single center experience.

Laparoscopic Appendectomy (LPSA) is the first choice for appendectomy in pediatric surgery. Trans-Umbilical Laparoscopic Assisted Appendicectomy (TULAA) is another used technique. We compared both these procedures used for the treatment of acute appendicitis. The study was conducted between January 2019 to December 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: LPSA and TULAA groups. The collected data were: operative time, number of conversions, time of canalization and hospital stay. A total of 181 patients were included: 73 were kept in the LPSA and 108 in the TULAA group. Mean operative time was 70.9 minutes (range 45-130 min) for LPS and 56.4 (30-145 min) for TULAA group (p <0.0001). Complications rate showed no statistically significant difference between both the two groups. However, conversions showed a statistically significant difference (p=0.04). Both techniques showed similar results. TULAA technique takes a significantly shorter operating time. The selection between LPSA and TULAA techniques depends on the experience of the surgeon's work and the personal laparoscopic learning curve. In our experience LPSA was a useful technique to improve the laparoscopic skill of the pediatric surgery residents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica
Pediatria Medica e Chirurgica Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信