{"title":"比较赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩CT评分对钝性创伤性脑损伤患者6个月预后的预测价值","authors":"Nushin Moussavi Biuki , Hamid Reza Talari , Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei , Masoumeh Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi , Hossein Akbari , Mahsa Masjedi Esfahani , Reihaneh Faghihi","doi":"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite advances in modern medicine, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are still a major medical problem. Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis. This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older. All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan, Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images. The patients’ demographic data such as age, gender, history of comorbid conditions, mechanism of trauma, Glasgow coma scale, CT images, length of hospital stay, and surgical procedures were recorded. The Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines. The included patients' 6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended. M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0. Sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test. The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the mean age of (44.9 ± 20.2) years. Most patients were male (80.7%), had traffic related injuries (83.1%) and mild TBIs (64.3%). Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores. Among all the scoring systems, the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’ outcomes (kappa = 0.657, <em>p</em> < 0.001). The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity (90.1%) in predicting death of TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity (89.8%) in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51555,"journal":{"name":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","volume":"26 6","pages":"Pages 357-362"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000263/pdfft?md5=04cf6e193aa69f46ba7ea9e4051a2b3f&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523000263-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the predictive value of the Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting 6-month outcomes in patients with blunt traumatic brain injuries\",\"authors\":\"Nushin Moussavi Biuki , Hamid Reza Talari , Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei , Masoumeh Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi , Hossein Akbari , Mahsa Masjedi Esfahani , Reihaneh Faghihi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.04.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Despite advances in modern medicine, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are still a major medical problem. Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis. This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older. All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan, Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images. The patients’ demographic data such as age, gender, history of comorbid conditions, mechanism of trauma, Glasgow coma scale, CT images, length of hospital stay, and surgical procedures were recorded. The Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines. The included patients' 6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended. M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0. Sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test. The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the mean age of (44.9 ± 20.2) years. Most patients were male (80.7%), had traffic related injuries (83.1%) and mild TBIs (64.3%). Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores. Among all the scoring systems, the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’ outcomes (kappa = 0.657, <em>p</em> < 0.001). The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity (90.1%) in predicting death of TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity (89.8%) in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 357-362\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000263/pdfft?md5=04cf6e193aa69f46ba7ea9e4051a2b3f&pid=1-s2.0-S1008127523000263-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese Journal of Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese Journal of Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1008127523000263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
目的尽管现代医学取得了进步,但创伤性脑损伤(tbi)仍然是一个重大的医学问题。TBI的早期诊断对临床决策和预后至关重要。本研究旨在比较赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩CT评分在预测钝性脑损伤患者6个月预后方面的预测价值。方法对15岁及以上的钝性脑损伤患者进行队列研究。所有患者均于2020年至2021年在伊朗卡尚市Shahid Beheshti医院外科急诊科就诊,脑CT扫描均有异常创伤相关表现。记录患者的年龄、性别、合并症史、创伤机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、CT影像、住院时间、手术方式等人口统计学资料。赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩的CT评分是根据现有的指南同时确定的。纳入患者的6个月预后采用扩展的格拉斯哥预后量表确定。M数据采用SPSS 16.0软件进行分析。计算每个试验的敏感性、特异性、阴性/阳性预测值和受试者工作特征曲线下面积。采用Kappa协议系数和Kuder Richardson-20对评分系统进行比较。结果171例TBI患者符合纳入和排除标准,平均年龄(44.9±20.2)岁。大多数患者为男性(80.7%),有交通相关损伤(83.1%)和轻度脑外伤(64.3%)。格拉斯哥昏迷评分较低的患者的赫尔辛基、鹿特丹和斯德哥尔摩CT评分较高,格拉斯哥结局评分扩展评分较低。在所有评分系统中,赫尔辛基和斯德哥尔摩评分在预测患者预后方面的一致性最高(kappa = 0.657, p <0.001)。鹿特丹评分系统在预测TBI患者死亡方面具有最高的敏感性(90.1%),而赫尔辛基评分系统在预测TBI患者6个月预后方面具有最高的敏感性(89.8%)。结论鹿特丹评分系统在预测TBI患者死亡方面优于赫尔辛基评分系统,而赫尔辛基评分系统在预测TBI患者6个月预后方面更为敏感。
Comparison of the predictive value of the Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting 6-month outcomes in patients with blunt traumatic brain injuries
Purpose
Despite advances in modern medicine, traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are still a major medical problem. Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis. This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.
Methods
This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older. All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan, Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images. The patients’ demographic data such as age, gender, history of comorbid conditions, mechanism of trauma, Glasgow coma scale, CT images, length of hospital stay, and surgical procedures were recorded. The Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines. The included patients' 6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended. M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0. Sensitivity, specificity, negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test. The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.
Results
Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, with the mean age of (44.9 ± 20.2) years. Most patients were male (80.7%), had traffic related injuries (83.1%) and mild TBIs (64.3%). Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki, Rotterdam, and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores. Among all the scoring systems, the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’ outcomes (kappa = 0.657, p < 0.001). The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity (90.1%) in predicting death of TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity (89.8%) in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.
Conclusion
The Rotterdam scoring system was superior in predicting death in TBI patients, whereas the Helsinki scoring system was more sensitive in predicting the 6-month outcome.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Traumatology (CJT, ISSN 1008-1275) was launched in 1998 and is a peer-reviewed English journal authorized by Chinese Association of Trauma, Chinese Medical Association. It is multidisciplinary and designed to provide the most current and relevant information for both the clinical and basic research in the field of traumatic medicine. CJT primarily publishes expert forums, original papers, case reports and so on. Topics cover trauma system and management, surgical procedures, acute care, rehabilitation, post-traumatic complications, translational medicine, traffic medicine and other related areas. The journal especially emphasizes clinical application, technique, surgical video, guideline, recommendations for more effective surgical approaches.