服用 vonoprazan 的患者不良事件的发生率和类型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.2 3区 医学
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2023-04-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848231167858
Wentao Xu, Zhaohui Bai, Yiyang Shang, Jing Wang, Yujun Wong, Xingshun Qi
{"title":"服用 vonoprazan 的患者不良事件的发生率和类型:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Wentao Xu, Zhaohui Bai, Yiyang Shang, Jing Wang, Yujun Wong, Xingshun Qi","doi":"10.1177/17562848231167858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vonoprazan, a novel acid-suppressive drug, is non-inferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. However, the safety of vonoprazan has not been systematically evaluated yet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) in patients taking vonoprazan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies reporting the safety of vonoprazan. The incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, and common AEs were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of AEs between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven studies were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation were 20, 7, 1, and 1%, respectively. The incidences of any AEs (OR = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.66), drug-related AEs (OR = 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.44), serious AEs (OR = 1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.36), and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (OR = 1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.55) were not significantly different between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. In subgroup analyses, patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) had higher incidences of any AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection, and artificial ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection had a higher incidence of drug-related AEs than those with PUD, GERD, and artificial ulcer after gastric ESD. The incidence of AEs was higher in patients taking long-term use of vonoprazan than those taking short-term use of vonoprazan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vonoprazan is well tolerated and shows similar safety compared to PPIs. The safety of vonoprazan may be primarily influenced by its indications and duration.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022314982.</p>","PeriodicalId":23022,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17562848231167858"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/8b/10.1177_17562848231167858.PMC10126681.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Wentao Xu, Zhaohui Bai, Yiyang Shang, Jing Wang, Yujun Wong, Xingshun Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848231167858\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vonoprazan, a novel acid-suppressive drug, is non-inferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. However, the safety of vonoprazan has not been systematically evaluated yet.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To elucidate the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) in patients taking vonoprazan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources and methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies reporting the safety of vonoprazan. The incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, and common AEs were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of AEs between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-seven studies were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation were 20, 7, 1, and 1%, respectively. The incidences of any AEs (OR = 0.96, <i>p</i> = 0.66), drug-related AEs (OR = 1.10, <i>p</i> = 0.44), serious AEs (OR = 1.14, <i>p</i> = 0.36), and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (OR = 1.09, <i>p</i> = 0.55) were not significantly different between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. In subgroup analyses, patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) had higher incidences of any AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) infection, and artificial ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but patients with <i>H. pylori</i> infection had a higher incidence of drug-related AEs than those with PUD, GERD, and artificial ulcer after gastric ESD. The incidence of AEs was higher in patients taking long-term use of vonoprazan than those taking short-term use of vonoprazan.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Vonoprazan is well tolerated and shows similar safety compared to PPIs. The safety of vonoprazan may be primarily influenced by its indications and duration.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42022314982.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23022,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17562848231167858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/c6/8b/10.1177_17562848231167858.PMC10126681.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231167858\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848231167858","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在治疗胃酸相关疾病方面,新型抑酸药物 Vonoprazan 的疗效并不亚于质子泵抑制剂 (PPI)。然而,目前尚未对伏诺普拉赞的安全性进行系统评估:阐明服用冯诺普拉赞的患者不良事件(AEs)的发生率和类型:设计:系统综述和荟萃分析:检索了PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库中所有报道vonoprazan安全性的研究。对任何AEs、药物相关AEs、严重AEs、导致停药的AEs和常见AEs的发生率进行了汇总。通过计算比值比(ORs)来比较服用Vonoprazan和PPIs患者的AEs发生率:结果:共纳入 77 项研究。任何AEs、药物相关AEs、严重AEs和导致停药的AEs的总发生率分别为20%、7%、1%和1%。任何AEs(OR = 0.96,P = 0.66)、药物相关AEs(OR = 1.10,P = 0.44)、严重AEs(OR = 1.14,P = 0.36)和导致停药的AEs(OR = 1.09,P = 0.55)的发生率在服用vonoprazan和PPIs的患者之间没有显著差异。在亚组分析中,与患有胃食管反流病(GERD)、幽门螺杆菌(H. pylori)感染和人工胃肠道疾病的患者相比,患有消化性溃疡病(PUD)的患者的任何AEs、严重AEs和导致停药的AEs发生率更高。但幽门螺杆菌感染患者的药物相关不良反应发生率高于 PUD、胃食管反流病和胃内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后人工溃疡患者。长期服用沃诺普拉赞的患者的AEs发生率高于短期服用沃诺普拉赞的患者:结论:与 PPIs 相比,Vonoprazan 具有良好的耐受性和相似的安全性。Vonoprazan的安全性可能主要受其适应症和持续时间的影响:注册号:PROCROPRO CRD42022314982。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Incidence and type of adverse events in patients taking vonoprazan: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Vonoprazan, a novel acid-suppressive drug, is non-inferior to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for the management of gastric acid-related diseases. However, the safety of vonoprazan has not been systematically evaluated yet.

Objectives: To elucidate the incidence and type of adverse events (AEs) in patients taking vonoprazan.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all studies reporting the safety of vonoprazan. The incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, AEs leading to drug discontinuation, and common AEs were pooled. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to compare the incidence of AEs between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs.

Results: Seventy-seven studies were included. The pooled incidences of any AEs, drug-related AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation were 20, 7, 1, and 1%, respectively. The incidences of any AEs (OR = 0.96, p = 0.66), drug-related AEs (OR = 1.10, p = 0.44), serious AEs (OR = 1.14, p = 0.36), and AEs leading to drug discontinuation (OR = 1.09, p = 0.55) were not significantly different between patients taking vonoprazan and PPIs. In subgroup analyses, patients with peptic ulcer disease (PUD) had higher incidences of any AEs, serious AEs, and AEs leading to drug discontinuation than those with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and artificial ulcer after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but patients with H. pylori infection had a higher incidence of drug-related AEs than those with PUD, GERD, and artificial ulcer after gastric ESD. The incidence of AEs was higher in patients taking long-term use of vonoprazan than those taking short-term use of vonoprazan.

Conclusion: Vonoprazan is well tolerated and shows similar safety compared to PPIs. The safety of vonoprazan may be primarily influenced by its indications and duration.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022314982.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology
Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
2.40%
发文量
103
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology is an open access journal which delivers the highest quality peer-reviewed original research articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of gastrointestinal and hepatic disorders. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at an international audience of clinicians and researchers in gastroenterology and related disciplines, providing an online forum for rapid dissemination of recent research and perspectives in this area. The editors welcome original research articles across all areas of gastroenterology and hepatology. The journal publishes original research articles and review articles primarily. Original research manuscripts may include laboratory, animal or human/clinical studies – all phases. Letters to the Editor and Case Reports will also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信