确定核心成果领域并设计调查问卷,以评估对糖尿病患者重要的数字健康解决方案的影响。

IF 4.1 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Soren Eik Skovlund, Scibilia Renza, Julie Laurent, Paco Cerletti
{"title":"确定核心成果领域并设计调查问卷,以评估对糖尿病患者重要的数字健康解决方案的影响。","authors":"Soren Eik Skovlund, Scibilia Renza, Julie Laurent, Paco Cerletti","doi":"10.1177/19322968231179740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health solutions (DHS) are increasingly used to support people with diabetes (PwD) to help manage their diabetes and to gather and manage health and treatment data. There is a need for scientifically reliable and valid methods to measure the value and impact of DHS on outcomes that matter to PwD. Here, we describe the development of a survey questionnaire designed to assess the perceptions of PwD toward DHS and their prioritized outcomes for DHS evaluation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We applied a structured process for engagement of a total of nine PwD and representatives of diabetes advocacy organizations. Questionnaire development consisted of a scoping literature review, individual interviews, workshops, asynchronous virtual collaboration, and cognitive debriefing interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three overarching categories of DHS, which were meaningful to PwD and crucial for the identification of relevant outcomes: (1) online/digital tools for information, education, support, motivation; (2) personal health monitoring to support self-management; (3) digital and telehealth solutions for engaging with health professionals. Overall outcome domains identified to be important were diabetes-related quality of life, distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management. Additional positive and negative outcomes specific to DHS were identified and corresponding questions were incorporated into the survey questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified the need for self-reporting of quality of life, diabetes distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management, as well as specific positive and negative impacts of DHS. We designed a survey questionnaire to further assess the perceptions and perspectives of people with type 1 and 2 diabetes on outcomes relevant for DHS evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"136-142"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Core Outcome Domains and Design of a Survey Questionnaire to Evaluate Impacts of Digital Health Solutions That Matter to People With Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Soren Eik Skovlund, Scibilia Renza, Julie Laurent, Paco Cerletti\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19322968231179740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital health solutions (DHS) are increasingly used to support people with diabetes (PwD) to help manage their diabetes and to gather and manage health and treatment data. There is a need for scientifically reliable and valid methods to measure the value and impact of DHS on outcomes that matter to PwD. Here, we describe the development of a survey questionnaire designed to assess the perceptions of PwD toward DHS and their prioritized outcomes for DHS evaluation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We applied a structured process for engagement of a total of nine PwD and representatives of diabetes advocacy organizations. Questionnaire development consisted of a scoping literature review, individual interviews, workshops, asynchronous virtual collaboration, and cognitive debriefing interviews.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified three overarching categories of DHS, which were meaningful to PwD and crucial for the identification of relevant outcomes: (1) online/digital tools for information, education, support, motivation; (2) personal health monitoring to support self-management; (3) digital and telehealth solutions for engaging with health professionals. Overall outcome domains identified to be important were diabetes-related quality of life, distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management. Additional positive and negative outcomes specific to DHS were identified and corresponding questions were incorporated into the survey questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We identified the need for self-reporting of quality of life, diabetes distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management, as well as specific positive and negative impacts of DHS. We designed a survey questionnaire to further assess the perceptions and perspectives of people with type 1 and 2 diabetes on outcomes relevant for DHS evaluations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"136-142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11688682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231179740\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968231179740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:数字健康解决方案(DHS)越来越多地用于支持糖尿病患者(PwD)帮助管理糖尿病,以及收集和管理健康和治疗数据。我们需要科学可靠、有效的方法来衡量数字健康解决方案对糖尿病患者的价值和影响。在此,我们介绍了一份调查问卷的开发过程,该问卷旨在评估残疾人对糖尿病保健服务的看法以及他们优先考虑的糖尿病保健服务评估结果:方法:我们采用了结构化流程,让九名残疾人和糖尿病倡导组织的代表参与其中。问卷编制包括范围性文献回顾、个别访谈、研讨会、异步虚拟协作和认知汇报访谈:结果:我们确定了三类对糖尿病患者有意义且对确定相关结果至关重要的数字健康服务:(1) 用于信息、教育、支持和激励的在线/数字工具;(2) 支持自我管理的个人健康监测;(3) 用于与医疗专业人员联系的数字和远程医疗解决方案。已确定的重要总体结果领域包括与糖尿病有关的生活质量、痛苦、治疗负担以及自我管理的信心。此外,我们还确定了与 DHS 相关的其他积极和消极结果,并将相应的问题纳入调查问卷中:我们发现需要对生活质量、糖尿病困扰、治疗负担、自我管理信心以及 DHS 的具体积极和消极影响进行自我报告。我们设计了一份调查问卷,以进一步评估 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者对与 DHS 评估相关的结果的看法和观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identification of Core Outcome Domains and Design of a Survey Questionnaire to Evaluate Impacts of Digital Health Solutions That Matter to People With Diabetes.

Background: Digital health solutions (DHS) are increasingly used to support people with diabetes (PwD) to help manage their diabetes and to gather and manage health and treatment data. There is a need for scientifically reliable and valid methods to measure the value and impact of DHS on outcomes that matter to PwD. Here, we describe the development of a survey questionnaire designed to assess the perceptions of PwD toward DHS and their prioritized outcomes for DHS evaluation.

Method: We applied a structured process for engagement of a total of nine PwD and representatives of diabetes advocacy organizations. Questionnaire development consisted of a scoping literature review, individual interviews, workshops, asynchronous virtual collaboration, and cognitive debriefing interviews.

Results: We identified three overarching categories of DHS, which were meaningful to PwD and crucial for the identification of relevant outcomes: (1) online/digital tools for information, education, support, motivation; (2) personal health monitoring to support self-management; (3) digital and telehealth solutions for engaging with health professionals. Overall outcome domains identified to be important were diabetes-related quality of life, distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management. Additional positive and negative outcomes specific to DHS were identified and corresponding questions were incorporated into the survey questionnaire.

Conclusion: We identified the need for self-reporting of quality of life, diabetes distress, treatment burden, and confidence in self-management, as well as specific positive and negative impacts of DHS. We designed a survey questionnaire to further assess the perceptions and perspectives of people with type 1 and 2 diabetes on outcomes relevant for DHS evaluations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信