胸腔内血管主动脉修补术治疗降主动脉瘤的长期疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-19 DOI:10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12648-6
Georgios I Karaolanis, Efstratios Georgakarakos, Agathi Karakosta, Georgios K Glantzounis, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Bernhard Dorweiler, Spyridon N Mylonas
{"title":"胸腔内血管主动脉修补术治疗降主动脉瘤的长期疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Georgios I Karaolanis, Efstratios Georgakarakos, Agathi Karakosta, Georgios K Glantzounis, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Bernhard Dorweiler, Spyridon N Mylonas","doi":"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12648-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We undertook a systematic review of the currently published literature on TEVAR for DTAAs and we combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the efficacy and the long-term durability of this treatment option.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search of the literature from January 2015 up to December 2022 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. For events during follow-up we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per 100 patient-years (p-ys) as the number of patients with outcome events occurring during the specific time period divided by the total number of p-ys.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 4127 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 12 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A Total of 1976 patients (62% male) were identified among the eligible studies. One-year survival was 90.1% (95% CI 86.3% to 93.0%), 3-year survival was estimated at 80.5% (95% CI 69.2% to 88.4%) and the 5-year survival was estimated at 73.2% (95%CI 64.3% to 80.5%) with significant heterogeneity among studies regarding these outcomes. Regarding freedom from reintervention analysis for 1 year and 5 years was 96.5% (95% CI 94.5% to 97.8%) and 85.4% (95% CI 56.7% to 96.3%) respectively. The pooled late complications IR per 100 p-ys was 55.0 (95% CI 39.1 to 70.9), whereas the pooled IR for late reinterventions per 100 p-ys was 21.2 (95% CI 26.0 to 87.5). Late type I endoleak was reported with a pooled IR of 26.7 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 19.8 to 33.6) and late type III endoleak with a pooled IR of 7.6 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 5.5 to 9.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR presents a safe and feasible solution for the treatment of DTAA with sustained long-term effectivity. Current evidence supports a satisfactory 5-year survival with low rates of reinterventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50245,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Georgios I Karaolanis, Efstratios Georgakarakos, Agathi Karakosta, Georgios K Glantzounis, Konstantinos G Moulakakis, Bernhard Dorweiler, Spyridon N Mylonas\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12648-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We undertook a systematic review of the currently published literature on TEVAR for DTAAs and we combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the efficacy and the long-term durability of this treatment option.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>A systematic search of the literature from January 2015 up to December 2022 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. For events during follow-up we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per 100 patient-years (p-ys) as the number of patients with outcome events occurring during the specific time period divided by the total number of p-ys.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A total of 4127 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 12 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A Total of 1976 patients (62% male) were identified among the eligible studies. One-year survival was 90.1% (95% CI 86.3% to 93.0%), 3-year survival was estimated at 80.5% (95% CI 69.2% to 88.4%) and the 5-year survival was estimated at 73.2% (95%CI 64.3% to 80.5%) with significant heterogeneity among studies regarding these outcomes. Regarding freedom from reintervention analysis for 1 year and 5 years was 96.5% (95% CI 94.5% to 97.8%) and 85.4% (95% CI 56.7% to 96.3%) respectively. The pooled late complications IR per 100 p-ys was 55.0 (95% CI 39.1 to 70.9), whereas the pooled IR for late reinterventions per 100 p-ys was 21.2 (95% CI 26.0 to 87.5). Late type I endoleak was reported with a pooled IR of 26.7 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 19.8 to 33.6) and late type III endoleak with a pooled IR of 7.6 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 5.5 to 9.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEVAR presents a safe and feasible solution for the treatment of DTAA with sustained long-term effectivity. Current evidence supports a satisfactory 5-year survival with low rates of reinterventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50245,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12648-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0021-9509.23.12648-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:我们对目前已发表的有关 TEVAR 治疗 DTAA 的文献进行了系统性回顾,并将符合条件的研究合并为一项荟萃分析,旨在评估这种治疗方案的疗效和长期持久性:根据PRISMA(系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南,我们对2015年1月至2022年12月的文献进行了系统检索。对于随访期间发生的事件,我们计算了每100患者年(p-ys)的发病率(IRs)及95%置信区间(95% CIs),即在特定时间段内发生结果事件的患者人数除以p-ys总数:最初的搜索策略共确定了 4127 个研究题目,其中 12 个被认为符合纳入荟萃分析的条件。在符合条件的研究中,共发现了 1976 名患者(62% 为男性)。一年生存率为 90.1%(95% CI 为 86.3% 至 93.0%),三年生存率估计为 80.5%(95% CI 为 69.2% 至 88.4%),五年生存率估计为 73.2%(95% CI 为 64.3% 至 80.5%)。关于1年和5年的再干预自由度分析,分别为96.5%(95%CI 94.5%至97.8%)和85.4%(95%CI 56.7%至96.3%)。每 100 pys 的汇总晚期并发症 IR 为 55.0(95% CI 39.1 至 70.9),而每 100 pys 的汇总晚期再介入 IR 为 21.2(95% CI 26.0 至 87.5)。晚期I型内漏的集合IR为每100 p-ys26.7(95% CI 19.8至33.6),晚期III型内漏的集合IR为每100 p-ys7.6(95% CI 5.5至9.7):TEVAR是治疗DTAA的一种安全可行的方法,具有持续的长期疗效。目前的证据表明,TEVAR 的 5 年存活率令人满意,再介入率较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-term outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Introduction: We undertook a systematic review of the currently published literature on TEVAR for DTAAs and we combined the eligible studies into a meta-analysis with the intention of evaluating the efficacy and the long-term durability of this treatment option.

Evidence acquisition: A systematic search of the literature from January 2015 up to December 2022 was performed according to the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. For events during follow-up we calculated the incidence rates (IRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) per 100 patient-years (p-ys) as the number of patients with outcome events occurring during the specific time period divided by the total number of p-ys.

Evidence synthesis: A total of 4127 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 12 were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A Total of 1976 patients (62% male) were identified among the eligible studies. One-year survival was 90.1% (95% CI 86.3% to 93.0%), 3-year survival was estimated at 80.5% (95% CI 69.2% to 88.4%) and the 5-year survival was estimated at 73.2% (95%CI 64.3% to 80.5%) with significant heterogeneity among studies regarding these outcomes. Regarding freedom from reintervention analysis for 1 year and 5 years was 96.5% (95% CI 94.5% to 97.8%) and 85.4% (95% CI 56.7% to 96.3%) respectively. The pooled late complications IR per 100 p-ys was 55.0 (95% CI 39.1 to 70.9), whereas the pooled IR for late reinterventions per 100 p-ys was 21.2 (95% CI 26.0 to 87.5). Late type I endoleak was reported with a pooled IR of 26.7 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 19.8 to 33.6) and late type III endoleak with a pooled IR of 7.6 per 100 p-ys (95% CI 5.5 to 9.7).

Conclusions: TEVAR presents a safe and feasible solution for the treatment of DTAA with sustained long-term effectivity. Current evidence supports a satisfactory 5-year survival with low rates of reinterventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
204
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery publishes scientific papers on cardiac, thoracic and vascular surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, therapeutical notes, special articles and letters to the Editor. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (www.icmje.org). Articles not conforming to international standards will not be considered for acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信