新冠肺炎大流行期间的强制社会隔离和封锁:希腊样本的抑郁、焦虑、创伤应激和应对机制。

IF 1.9 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Athanasia Liozidou, Vasiliki Varela, Dimitris D Vlastos, Erasmia Giogkaraki, Elisabet Alzueta, Paul B Perrin, Daniela Ramos-Usuga, Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
{"title":"新冠肺炎大流行期间的强制社会隔离和封锁:希腊样本的抑郁、焦虑、创伤应激和应对机制。","authors":"Athanasia Liozidou,&nbsp;Vasiliki Varela,&nbsp;Dimitris D Vlastos,&nbsp;Erasmia Giogkaraki,&nbsp;Elisabet Alzueta,&nbsp;Paul B Perrin,&nbsp;Daniela Ramos-Usuga,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla","doi":"10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The COVID-19 outbreak escalated into a global pandemic, pushing many governments around the world to impose measures affecting all aspects of life. Similar to other countries, Greece adopted social restriction, lockdowns, and quarantines to reduce transmission from person-to-person. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between social restriction measures, an mental health and coping strategies employed by a Greek adult sample.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was used to collect data during the second national lockdown (February to May 2021). A total of 650 participants (<i>M</i> age 33.13, 71.5% female) comprised the final sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show 21.3% of respondents reported moderate-to-extremely severe anxiety, 33% moderate-to-extremely severe depression, 31.8% moderate-to-severe stress, and 38% clinically significant trauma-related distress. Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that the strongest contributors to adverse mental health outcomes were being female, of younger age, experiencing increases in verbal arguments at home, being separated from family and close friends, and being unable to afford enough or healthy food. Lastly, participants reported moving away from social support and into more individual strength and resilience-based coping strategies to cope with challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that in addition to the detrimental effects on physical health, social restriction measures related to COVID-19 also imposed a heavy psychological burden on the population via forced social isolation, which, by design, increased not only physical distancing but also psychological distancing between people.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3.</p>","PeriodicalId":29967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097449/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forced social isolation and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: depression, anxiety, trauma-distress and coping mechanisms of a Greek sample.\",\"authors\":\"Athanasia Liozidou,&nbsp;Vasiliki Varela,&nbsp;Dimitris D Vlastos,&nbsp;Erasmia Giogkaraki,&nbsp;Elisabet Alzueta,&nbsp;Paul B Perrin,&nbsp;Daniela Ramos-Usuga,&nbsp;Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The COVID-19 outbreak escalated into a global pandemic, pushing many governments around the world to impose measures affecting all aspects of life. Similar to other countries, Greece adopted social restriction, lockdowns, and quarantines to reduce transmission from person-to-person. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between social restriction measures, an mental health and coping strategies employed by a Greek adult sample.</p><p><strong>Subject and methods: </strong>An online questionnaire was used to collect data during the second national lockdown (February to May 2021). A total of 650 participants (<i>M</i> age 33.13, 71.5% female) comprised the final sample.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show 21.3% of respondents reported moderate-to-extremely severe anxiety, 33% moderate-to-extremely severe depression, 31.8% moderate-to-severe stress, and 38% clinically significant trauma-related distress. Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that the strongest contributors to adverse mental health outcomes were being female, of younger age, experiencing increases in verbal arguments at home, being separated from family and close friends, and being unable to afford enough or healthy food. Lastly, participants reported moving away from social support and into more individual strength and resilience-based coping strategies to cope with challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that in addition to the detrimental effects on physical health, social restriction measures related to COVID-19 also imposed a heavy psychological burden on the population via forced social isolation, which, by design, increased not only physical distancing but also psychological distancing between people.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10097449/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:新冠肺炎疫情升级为全球大流行,迫使世界各地的许多政府采取影响生活方方面面的措施。与其他国家类似,希腊采取了社交限制、封锁和隔离措施,以减少人与人之间的传播。这项横断面研究调查了希腊成年人样本的社会限制措施、心理健康和应对策略之间的关系。主题和方法:在第二次全国封锁期间(2021年2月至5月),使用在线问卷收集数据。最终样本共有650名参与者(男性,年龄33.13岁,71.5%为女性)。结果:结果显示,21.3%的受访者报告中度至极度焦虑,33%的受访者报告轻度至极度抑郁,31.8%的受访者报告中等至重度压力,38%的受访者报告具有临床意义的创伤相关痛苦。分层线性回归分析显示,造成不良心理健康结果的最主要因素是女性,年龄较小,在家中言语争吵增多,与家人和亲密朋友分离,以及买不起足够或健康的食物。最后,参与者报告说,为了应对挑战,他们放弃了社会支持,转而采用基于个人力量和韧性的应对策略。结论:这些发现表明,除了对身体健康的有害影响外,与新冠肺炎相关的社交限制措施还通过强制社交隔离给人群带来了沉重的心理负担,这在设计上不仅增加了人与人之间的身体距离,还增加了人之间的心理距离。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,请访问10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forced social isolation and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: depression, anxiety, trauma-distress and coping mechanisms of a Greek sample.

Forced social isolation and lockdown during the COVID-19 pandemic: depression, anxiety, trauma-distress and coping mechanisms of a Greek sample.

Aim: The COVID-19 outbreak escalated into a global pandemic, pushing many governments around the world to impose measures affecting all aspects of life. Similar to other countries, Greece adopted social restriction, lockdowns, and quarantines to reduce transmission from person-to-person. This cross-sectional study investigated the association between social restriction measures, an mental health and coping strategies employed by a Greek adult sample.

Subject and methods: An online questionnaire was used to collect data during the second national lockdown (February to May 2021). A total of 650 participants (M age 33.13, 71.5% female) comprised the final sample.

Results: The results show 21.3% of respondents reported moderate-to-extremely severe anxiety, 33% moderate-to-extremely severe depression, 31.8% moderate-to-severe stress, and 38% clinically significant trauma-related distress. Hierarchical linear regression analyses revealed that the strongest contributors to adverse mental health outcomes were being female, of younger age, experiencing increases in verbal arguments at home, being separated from family and close friends, and being unable to afford enough or healthy food. Lastly, participants reported moving away from social support and into more individual strength and resilience-based coping strategies to cope with challenges.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that in addition to the detrimental effects on physical health, social restriction measures related to COVID-19 also imposed a heavy psychological burden on the population via forced social isolation, which, by design, increased not only physical distancing but also psychological distancing between people.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10389-023-01907-3.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg
Journal of Public Health-Heidelberg PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信