【临床质量管理——以流感疫苗接种为例的全科实践方法】。

Vera Souhrada, Mirjam Zrenner, Emmily Schaubroeck, Marco Roos, Thomas Kühlein
{"title":"【临床质量管理——以流感疫苗接种为例的全科实践方法】。","authors":"Vera Souhrada,&nbsp;Mirjam Zrenner,&nbsp;Emmily Schaubroeck,&nbsp;Marco Roos,&nbsp;Thomas Kühlein","doi":"10.1007/s44266-023-00060-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We understand clinical quality governance (CQG) as quality management in the clinical domain. In 2020, presumably due to the coronavirus pandemic, more patients requested to be vaccinated against influenza as compared to previous years so that it became apparent that there would be a shortage for high-risk patients. To meet the problem, we started a CQG process. This article is explicitly not a research article but an exemplary description of a CQG process intended as a stimulus and for discussion. We initiated the following process: (1) evaluation of the present state, (2) patients who already had requested a vaccination were prioritized and vaccinated first, and (3) contacting via telephone and vaccination of high-risk patients not on the list. We chose patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) older than 60 years as an indicator for the group of highest priority. In the beginning only 3 (8%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated against influenza. After prioritization and vaccination of the high-risk collective in the list of those who had requested to be vaccinated, 25 (66%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated. After a phone call of high-risk patients not on the list, 28 (74%) patients were vaccinated. This represents an increase of vaccination coverage from 8% to 74% which is close to the rate recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). In times of a pandemic, family physicians occasionally have to deal with a scarcity of resources and have to develop strategies for fair resource allocation. Not only in this context is CQG worth the effort. The generation of list queries could be improved by the providers of electronic patient records.</p>","PeriodicalId":24078,"journal":{"name":"ZFA. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Clinical quality governance-a practical approach in general practice with the example of influenza vaccination].\",\"authors\":\"Vera Souhrada,&nbsp;Mirjam Zrenner,&nbsp;Emmily Schaubroeck,&nbsp;Marco Roos,&nbsp;Thomas Kühlein\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44266-023-00060-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We understand clinical quality governance (CQG) as quality management in the clinical domain. In 2020, presumably due to the coronavirus pandemic, more patients requested to be vaccinated against influenza as compared to previous years so that it became apparent that there would be a shortage for high-risk patients. To meet the problem, we started a CQG process. This article is explicitly not a research article but an exemplary description of a CQG process intended as a stimulus and for discussion. We initiated the following process: (1) evaluation of the present state, (2) patients who already had requested a vaccination were prioritized and vaccinated first, and (3) contacting via telephone and vaccination of high-risk patients not on the list. We chose patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) older than 60 years as an indicator for the group of highest priority. In the beginning only 3 (8%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated against influenza. After prioritization and vaccination of the high-risk collective in the list of those who had requested to be vaccinated, 25 (66%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated. After a phone call of high-risk patients not on the list, 28 (74%) patients were vaccinated. This represents an increase of vaccination coverage from 8% to 74% which is close to the rate recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). In times of a pandemic, family physicians occasionally have to deal with a scarcity of resources and have to develop strategies for fair resource allocation. Not only in this context is CQG worth the effort. The generation of list queries could be improved by the providers of electronic patient records.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":24078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZFA. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10214341/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZFA. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44266-023-00060-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZFA. Zeitschrift fur Allgemeinmedizin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44266-023-00060-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们将临床质量管理理解为临床领域的质量管理。2020年,可能是由于冠状病毒大流行,与前几年相比,更多的患者要求接种流感疫苗,因此很明显,高风险患者将短缺。为了解决这个问题,我们启动了CQG流程。这篇文章显然不是一篇研究文章,而是对CQG过程的示例性描述,旨在作为激励和讨论。我们启动了以下过程:(1)评估目前的状态,(2)已经要求接种疫苗的患者被优先考虑并首先接种疫苗,以及(3)通过电话联系并接种不在名单上的高危患者。我们选择60岁以上的慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者作为最高优先级组的指标。一开始,在我们的38名COPD患者中,只有3人(8%)接种了流感疫苗。在对要求接种疫苗的高危人群进行优先排序和接种疫苗后,我们38名COPD患者中有25人(66%)接种了疫苗。在接到不在名单上的高危患者的电话后,28名(74%)患者接种了疫苗。这意味着疫苗接种覆盖率从8%增加到74%,接近世界卫生组织(世界卫生组织)建议的接种率。在疫情期间,家庭医生偶尔不得不应对资源短缺的问题,并制定公平分配资源的策略。不仅在这种情况下,CQG值得付出努力。电子病历的提供者可以改进列表查询的生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

[Clinical quality governance-a practical approach in general practice with the example of influenza vaccination].

[Clinical quality governance-a practical approach in general practice with the example of influenza vaccination].

We understand clinical quality governance (CQG) as quality management in the clinical domain. In 2020, presumably due to the coronavirus pandemic, more patients requested to be vaccinated against influenza as compared to previous years so that it became apparent that there would be a shortage for high-risk patients. To meet the problem, we started a CQG process. This article is explicitly not a research article but an exemplary description of a CQG process intended as a stimulus and for discussion. We initiated the following process: (1) evaluation of the present state, (2) patients who already had requested a vaccination were prioritized and vaccinated first, and (3) contacting via telephone and vaccination of high-risk patients not on the list. We chose patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) older than 60 years as an indicator for the group of highest priority. In the beginning only 3 (8%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated against influenza. After prioritization and vaccination of the high-risk collective in the list of those who had requested to be vaccinated, 25 (66%) of our 38 patients with COPD were vaccinated. After a phone call of high-risk patients not on the list, 28 (74%) patients were vaccinated. This represents an increase of vaccination coverage from 8% to 74% which is close to the rate recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO). In times of a pandemic, family physicians occasionally have to deal with a scarcity of resources and have to develop strategies for fair resource allocation. Not only in this context is CQG worth the effort. The generation of list queries could be improved by the providers of electronic patient records.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信