简短的青少年抽动自我报告筛选器:运动抽搐、强迫和发声抽搐评估调查(MOVES)的一个分量表能否识别青少年的抽搐症?

Adam B Lewin, Tanya K Murphy, Jonathan W Mink, Brent J Small, Heather R Adams, Erin Brennan, Erika F Augustine, Jennifer Vermilion, Amy Vierhile, Alyssa Collins, Kelly Kudryk, Sarah Dickinson, Melissa L Danielson, Rebecca H Bitsko
{"title":"简短的青少年抽动自我报告筛选器:运动抽搐、强迫和发声抽搐评估调查(MOVES)的一个分量表能否识别青少年的抽搐症?","authors":"Adam B Lewin, Tanya K Murphy, Jonathan W Mink, Brent J Small, Heather R Adams, Erin Brennan, Erika F Augustine, Jennifer Vermilion, Amy Vierhile, Alyssa Collins, Kelly Kudryk, Sarah Dickinson, Melissa L Danielson, Rebecca H Bitsko","doi":"10.1080/23794925.2023.2191354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tics are unwanted, repetitive movements and sounds that frequently present during childhood. They are typically brief and purposeless, but can create significant distress for individuals, and often co-occur with other neuropsychiatric conditions. Thus, early identification of tics is warranted. Unfortunately, tics are often misdiagnosed, and because tics may wax and wane, identification can be difficult, especially in the context of routine clinical visits. There are limited tools that can be used to reliably identify tics in clinical practice, especially in non-specialty settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the performance of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES), a self-report scale with some support as a screening tool. In addition, the performance of a subset of questions (the MOVES-6) was evaluated for rapid screening. Participants were recruited across two study sites and included children and adolescents diagnosed with Tourette syndrome (<i>n</i> = 151) or another persistent tic disorder (<i>n</i> = 10) and community controls (<i>n</i> = 74). Results suggest both the MOVES and the MOVES-6 have high sensitivity (90% and 88%, respectively) and at least acceptable specificity (77% and 86%, respectively) compared with expert assessment of tic disorders, suggesting that both versions can identify tic disorders without high proportions of false negatives. Both versions were highly sensitive with acceptable specificity regardless of sex, race/ethnicity, and age. The MOVES and MOVES-6 show promise as a screener for tics or tic disorders, but additional research is needed, particularly in a general population setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":72992,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","volume":"8 2","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief youth self-report screener for tics: Can a subscale of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES) identify tic disorders in youth?\",\"authors\":\"Adam B Lewin, Tanya K Murphy, Jonathan W Mink, Brent J Small, Heather R Adams, Erin Brennan, Erika F Augustine, Jennifer Vermilion, Amy Vierhile, Alyssa Collins, Kelly Kudryk, Sarah Dickinson, Melissa L Danielson, Rebecca H Bitsko\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23794925.2023.2191354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Tics are unwanted, repetitive movements and sounds that frequently present during childhood. They are typically brief and purposeless, but can create significant distress for individuals, and often co-occur with other neuropsychiatric conditions. Thus, early identification of tics is warranted. Unfortunately, tics are often misdiagnosed, and because tics may wax and wane, identification can be difficult, especially in the context of routine clinical visits. There are limited tools that can be used to reliably identify tics in clinical practice, especially in non-specialty settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the performance of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES), a self-report scale with some support as a screening tool. In addition, the performance of a subset of questions (the MOVES-6) was evaluated for rapid screening. Participants were recruited across two study sites and included children and adolescents diagnosed with Tourette syndrome (<i>n</i> = 151) or another persistent tic disorder (<i>n</i> = 10) and community controls (<i>n</i> = 74). Results suggest both the MOVES and the MOVES-6 have high sensitivity (90% and 88%, respectively) and at least acceptable specificity (77% and 86%, respectively) compared with expert assessment of tic disorders, suggesting that both versions can identify tic disorders without high proportions of false negatives. Both versions were highly sensitive with acceptable specificity regardless of sex, race/ethnicity, and age. The MOVES and MOVES-6 show promise as a screener for tics or tic disorders, but additional research is needed, particularly in a general population setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10267813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2191354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based practice in child and adolescent mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2023.2191354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抽搐是儿童时期经常出现的不想要的重复动作和声音。它们通常很短暂,没有目的,但会给患者带来极大的痛苦,而且经常与其他神经精神疾病同时出现。因此,应及早识别抽搐。不幸的是,抽搐经常被误诊,而且由于抽搐可能时好时坏,识别起来很困难,尤其是在常规临床就诊时。在临床实践中,尤其是在非专科环境中,用于可靠识别抽搐的工具非常有限。本研究旨在评估 "运动抽搐、强迫和发声抽搐评估调查(MOVES)"的表现。此外,还对用于快速筛查的问题子集(MOVES-6)的性能进行了评估。参与者在两个研究地点招募,包括被诊断患有图雷特综合征(n = 151)或其他持续性抽动障碍(n = 10)的儿童和青少年以及社区对照组(n = 74)。结果表明,与专家对抽动障碍的评估相比,MOVES 和 MOVES-6 均具有较高的灵敏度(分别为 90% 和 88%)和至少可接受的特异性(分别为 77% 和 86%),这表明这两个版本都能识别抽动障碍,而不会出现高比例的假阴性。无论性别、种族/民族和年龄如何,两个版本都具有高度敏感性和可接受的特异性。MOVES和MOVES-6显示出作为抽动或抽动障碍筛查工具的前景,但还需要进行更多的研究,尤其是在普通人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Brief youth self-report screener for tics: Can a subscale of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES) identify tic disorders in youth?

Tics are unwanted, repetitive movements and sounds that frequently present during childhood. They are typically brief and purposeless, but can create significant distress for individuals, and often co-occur with other neuropsychiatric conditions. Thus, early identification of tics is warranted. Unfortunately, tics are often misdiagnosed, and because tics may wax and wane, identification can be difficult, especially in the context of routine clinical visits. There are limited tools that can be used to reliably identify tics in clinical practice, especially in non-specialty settings. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the performance of the Motor tic, Obsession and compulsion, and Vocal tic Evaluation Survey (MOVES), a self-report scale with some support as a screening tool. In addition, the performance of a subset of questions (the MOVES-6) was evaluated for rapid screening. Participants were recruited across two study sites and included children and adolescents diagnosed with Tourette syndrome (n = 151) or another persistent tic disorder (n = 10) and community controls (n = 74). Results suggest both the MOVES and the MOVES-6 have high sensitivity (90% and 88%, respectively) and at least acceptable specificity (77% and 86%, respectively) compared with expert assessment of tic disorders, suggesting that both versions can identify tic disorders without high proportions of false negatives. Both versions were highly sensitive with acceptable specificity regardless of sex, race/ethnicity, and age. The MOVES and MOVES-6 show promise as a screener for tics or tic disorders, but additional research is needed, particularly in a general population setting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信