预测聋儿和重听儿单词解码发展的变化。

IF 2.2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sascha Couvee, Loes Wauters, Harry Knoors, Ludo Verhoeven, Eliane Segers
{"title":"预测聋儿和重听儿单词解码发展的变化。","authors":"Sascha Couvee,&nbsp;Loes Wauters,&nbsp;Harry Knoors,&nbsp;Ludo Verhoeven,&nbsp;Eliane Segers","doi":"10.1007/s11145-023-10444-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children may experience difficulties in word decoding development.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare and predict the incremental word decoding development in first grade in Dutch DHH and hearing children, as a function of kindergarten reading precursors.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>In this study, 25 DHH, and 41 hearing children participated. Kindergarten measures were phonological awareness (PA), letter knowledge (LK), rapid naming (RAN), and verbal short-term memory (VSTM). Word decoding (WD) was assessed at three consecutive time points (WD1, 2, 3) during reading instruction in first grade.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and results: </strong>The hearing children scored higher than the DHH children on PA and VSTM only, although the distribution of WD scores differed between the groups. At WD1, PA and RAN predicted WD efficiency in both groups; but PA was a stronger predictor for hearing children. At WD2, LK, RAN, and the autoregressor were predictors for both groups. While at WD3, only the autoregressor was a significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>WD development in DHH children on average shows similar levels as in hearing children, though within the DHH group more variation was observed. WD development in DHH children is not as much driven by PA; they may use other skills to compensate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48204,"journal":{"name":"Reading and Writing","volume":" ","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting variation in word decoding development in deaf and hard-of-hearing children.\",\"authors\":\"Sascha Couvee,&nbsp;Loes Wauters,&nbsp;Harry Knoors,&nbsp;Ludo Verhoeven,&nbsp;Eliane Segers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11145-023-10444-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children may experience difficulties in word decoding development.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>We aimed to compare and predict the incremental word decoding development in first grade in Dutch DHH and hearing children, as a function of kindergarten reading precursors.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>In this study, 25 DHH, and 41 hearing children participated. Kindergarten measures were phonological awareness (PA), letter knowledge (LK), rapid naming (RAN), and verbal short-term memory (VSTM). Word decoding (WD) was assessed at three consecutive time points (WD1, 2, 3) during reading instruction in first grade.</p><p><strong>Outcomes and results: </strong>The hearing children scored higher than the DHH children on PA and VSTM only, although the distribution of WD scores differed between the groups. At WD1, PA and RAN predicted WD efficiency in both groups; but PA was a stronger predictor for hearing children. At WD2, LK, RAN, and the autoregressor were predictors for both groups. While at WD3, only the autoregressor was a significant predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>WD development in DHH children on average shows similar levels as in hearing children, though within the DHH group more variation was observed. WD development in DHH children is not as much driven by PA; they may use other skills to compensate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48204,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10175058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading and Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10444-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10444-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:聋哑儿童在单词解码发展方面可能会遇到困难。目的:我们旨在比较和预测荷兰DHH和听力儿童一年级的增量单词解码发展,作为幼儿园阅读前兆的函数。方法和程序:在本研究中,25名DHH和41名听力儿童参与。幼儿园的测量指标是语音意识(PA)、字母知识(LK)、快速命名(RAN)和言语短期记忆(VSTM)。在一年级的阅读教学中,在三个连续的时间点(WD1、2、3)评估单词解码(WD)。结果和结果:听力儿童在PA和VSTM方面的得分高于DHH儿童,尽管WD得分在各组之间的分布不同。在WD1时,PA和RAN预测了两组的WD效率;但PA对听力儿童的预测作用更强。在WD2时,LK、RAN和自动除法器是两组的预测因素。而在WD3,只有自动除法器是一个重要的预测因素。结论和意义:DHH儿童的WD发展平均与听力儿童相似,尽管在DHH组中观察到更多的变化。DHH儿童的WD发展在很大程度上不是由PA驱动的;他们可能会使用其他技能来补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting variation in word decoding development in deaf and hard-of-hearing children.

Background: Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children may experience difficulties in word decoding development.

Aims: We aimed to compare and predict the incremental word decoding development in first grade in Dutch DHH and hearing children, as a function of kindergarten reading precursors.

Methods and procedures: In this study, 25 DHH, and 41 hearing children participated. Kindergarten measures were phonological awareness (PA), letter knowledge (LK), rapid naming (RAN), and verbal short-term memory (VSTM). Word decoding (WD) was assessed at three consecutive time points (WD1, 2, 3) during reading instruction in first grade.

Outcomes and results: The hearing children scored higher than the DHH children on PA and VSTM only, although the distribution of WD scores differed between the groups. At WD1, PA and RAN predicted WD efficiency in both groups; but PA was a stronger predictor for hearing children. At WD2, LK, RAN, and the autoregressor were predictors for both groups. While at WD3, only the autoregressor was a significant predictor.

Conclusions and implications: WD development in DHH children on average shows similar levels as in hearing children, though within the DHH group more variation was observed. WD development in DHH children is not as much driven by PA; they may use other skills to compensate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Reading and writing skills are fundamental to literacy. Consequently, the processes involved in reading and writing and the failure to acquire these skills, as well as the loss of once well-developed reading and writing abilities have been the targets of intense research activity involving professionals from a variety of disciplines, such as neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, psycholinguistics and education. The findings that have emanated from this research are most often written up in a lingua that is specific to the particular discipline involved, and are published in specialized journals. This generally leaves the expert in one area almost totally unaware of what may be taking place in any area other than their own. Reading and Writing cuts through this fog of jargon, breaking down the artificial boundaries between disciplines. The journal focuses on the interaction among various fields, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Reading and Writing publishes high-quality, scientific articles pertaining to the processes, acquisition, and loss of reading and writing skills. The journal fully represents the necessarily interdisciplinary nature of research in the field, focusing on the interaction among various disciplines, such as linguistics, information processing, neuropsychology, cognitive psychology, speech and hearing science and education. Coverage in Reading and Writing includes models of reading, writing and spelling at all age levels; orthography and its relation to reading and writing; computer literacy; cross-cultural studies; and developmental and acquired disorders of reading and writing. It publishes research articles, critical reviews, theoretical papers, and case studies. Reading and Writing is one of the most highly cited journals in Education, Educational Research, and Educational Psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信