让不同种族和族裔的晚期前列腺癌男性参与设计移动医疗饮食和运动干预措施:焦点小组研究。

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JMIR Cancer Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.2196/45432
Elizabeth Y Wang, Hala T Borno, Samuel L Washington Iii, Terence Friedlander, Sylvia Zhang, Evelin Trejo, Erin L Van Blarigan, June M Chan, Salma Shariff-Marco, Alexis L Beatty, Stacey A Kenfield
{"title":"让不同种族和族裔的晚期前列腺癌男性参与设计移动医疗饮食和运动干预措施:焦点小组研究。","authors":"Elizabeth Y Wang, Hala T Borno, Samuel L Washington Iii, Terence Friedlander, Sylvia Zhang, Evelin Trejo, Erin L Van Blarigan, June M Chan, Salma Shariff-Marco, Alexis L Beatty, Stacey A Kenfield","doi":"10.2196/45432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthy diet and exercise can improve quality of life and prognosis among men with prostate cancer. Understanding the perceived barriers to lifestyle change and patient preferences in a diverse cohort of men with prostate cancer is necessary to inform mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle interventions and increase health equity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a multisite study to understand the preferences, attitudes, and health behaviors related to diet and lifestyle in this patient population. This report focuses on the qualitative findings from 4 web-based focus groups comprising a racially and ethnically diverse group of patients with advanced prostate cancer who are on androgen deprivation therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used grounded theory analyses including open, axial, and selective coding to generate codes. Qualitative data were analyzed as a whole rather than by focus group to optimize data saturation and the transferability of results. We present codes and themes that emerged for lifestyle intervention design and provide recommendations and considerations for future mHealth intervention studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14 men participated in 4 racially and ethnically concordant focus groups (African American or Black: 3/14, 21%; Asian American: 3/14, 21%; Hispanic or Latino: 3/14, 21%; and White: 5/14, 36%). Analyses converged on 7 interwoven categories: context (home environment, access, competing priorities, and lifestyle programs), motivation (accountability, discordance, feeling supported, fear, and temptation), preparedness (health literacy, technological literacy, technological preferences, trust, readiness to change, identity, adaptability, and clinical characteristics), data-driven design (education, psychosocial factors, and quality of life), program mechanics (communication, materials, customization, and being holistic), habits (eg, dietary habits), and intervention impressions. These results suggest actionable pathways to increase program intuitiveness. Recommendations for future mHealth intervention design and implementation include but are not limited to assessment at the individual, household, and neighborhood levels to support a tailored intervention; prioritization of information to disseminate based on individuals' major concerns and the delivery of information based on health and technological literacy and communication preferences; prescribing a personalized intervention based on individuals' baseline responses, home and neighborhood environment, and support network; and incorporating strategies to foster engagement (eg, responsive and relevant feedback systems) to aid participant decision-making and behavior change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessing a patient's social context, motivation, and preparedness is necessary when tailoring a program to each patient's needs in all racial and ethnic groups. Addressing the patients' contexts and motivation and preparedness related to diet and exercise including the household, access (to food and exercise), competing priorities, health and technological literacy, readiness to change, and clinical characteristics will help to customize the intervention to the participant. These data support a tailored approach leveraging the identified components and their interrelationships to ensure that mHealth lifestyle interventions will engage and be effective in racially and ethnically diverse patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05324098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324098.</p>","PeriodicalId":45538,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Cancer","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging Men of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups With Advanced Prostate Cancer in the Design of an mHealth Diet and Exercise Intervention: Focus Group Study.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Y Wang, Hala T Borno, Samuel L Washington Iii, Terence Friedlander, Sylvia Zhang, Evelin Trejo, Erin L Van Blarigan, June M Chan, Salma Shariff-Marco, Alexis L Beatty, Stacey A Kenfield\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/45432\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthy diet and exercise can improve quality of life and prognosis among men with prostate cancer. Understanding the perceived barriers to lifestyle change and patient preferences in a diverse cohort of men with prostate cancer is necessary to inform mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle interventions and increase health equity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We conducted a multisite study to understand the preferences, attitudes, and health behaviors related to diet and lifestyle in this patient population. This report focuses on the qualitative findings from 4 web-based focus groups comprising a racially and ethnically diverse group of patients with advanced prostate cancer who are on androgen deprivation therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used grounded theory analyses including open, axial, and selective coding to generate codes. Qualitative data were analyzed as a whole rather than by focus group to optimize data saturation and the transferability of results. We present codes and themes that emerged for lifestyle intervention design and provide recommendations and considerations for future mHealth intervention studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14 men participated in 4 racially and ethnically concordant focus groups (African American or Black: 3/14, 21%; Asian American: 3/14, 21%; Hispanic or Latino: 3/14, 21%; and White: 5/14, 36%). Analyses converged on 7 interwoven categories: context (home environment, access, competing priorities, and lifestyle programs), motivation (accountability, discordance, feeling supported, fear, and temptation), preparedness (health literacy, technological literacy, technological preferences, trust, readiness to change, identity, adaptability, and clinical characteristics), data-driven design (education, psychosocial factors, and quality of life), program mechanics (communication, materials, customization, and being holistic), habits (eg, dietary habits), and intervention impressions. These results suggest actionable pathways to increase program intuitiveness. Recommendations for future mHealth intervention design and implementation include but are not limited to assessment at the individual, household, and neighborhood levels to support a tailored intervention; prioritization of information to disseminate based on individuals' major concerns and the delivery of information based on health and technological literacy and communication preferences; prescribing a personalized intervention based on individuals' baseline responses, home and neighborhood environment, and support network; and incorporating strategies to foster engagement (eg, responsive and relevant feedback systems) to aid participant decision-making and behavior change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assessing a patient's social context, motivation, and preparedness is necessary when tailoring a program to each patient's needs in all racial and ethnic groups. Addressing the patients' contexts and motivation and preparedness related to diet and exercise including the household, access (to food and exercise), competing priorities, health and technological literacy, readiness to change, and clinical characteristics will help to customize the intervention to the participant. These data support a tailored approach leveraging the identified components and their interrelationships to ensure that mHealth lifestyle interventions will engage and be effective in racially and ethnically diverse patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05324098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324098.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10273032/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/45432\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/45432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:健康饮食和锻炼可以提高前列腺癌男性患者的生活质量和预后。有必要了解前列腺癌男性患者群体在改变生活方式时遇到的障碍以及患者的偏好,以便为移动医疗(mHealth)生活方式干预提供信息并提高健康公平性:我们开展了一项多站点研究,以了解该患者群体在饮食和生活方式方面的偏好、态度和健康行为。本报告重点介绍 4 个基于网络的焦点小组的定性研究结果,这些焦点小组由接受雄激素剥夺疗法的不同种族和民族的晚期前列腺癌患者组成:我们采用了基础理论分析方法,包括开放式编码、轴向编码和选择性编码来生成代码。我们对定性数据进行了整体分析,而不是按焦点小组进行分析,以优化数据饱和度和结果的可转移性。我们介绍了生活方式干预设计中出现的代码和主题,并为未来的移动健康干预研究提供了建议和注意事项:共有 14 名男性参加了 4 个种族和民族一致的焦点小组(非裔美国人或黑人:3/14,21%;亚裔美国人:3/14,21%;西班牙裔或拉丁裔:3/14,21%;白人:5/14,36%)。分析集中在 7 个相互交织的类别上:背景(家庭环境、获取途径、竞争性优先事项和生活方式计划)、动机(责任感、不和谐、感到被支持、恐惧和诱惑)、准备(健康知识、技术知识、技术偏好、信任、改变的准备、身份、适应性和临床特征)、数据驱动设计(教育、社会心理因素和生活质量)、计划机制(沟通、材料、定制和整体性)、习惯(如饮食习惯)和干预印象。这些结果为提高项目的直观性提供了可行的途径。对未来移动医疗干预设计和实施的建议包括但不限于:在个人、家庭和邻里层面进行评估,以支持量身定制的干预;根据个人的主要关注点确定信息传播的优先顺序,并根据健康和技术知识以及沟通偏好提供信息;根据个人的基线反应、家庭和邻里环境以及支持网络制定个性化的干预措施;以及纳入促进参与的策略(例如,反应灵敏且相关的反馈系统),以帮助参与者做出决策和改变行为:结论:在所有种族和民族群体中,根据每个患者的需求量身定制计划时,有必要评估患者的社会背景、动机和准备情况。解决患者与饮食和运动相关的背景、动机和准备情况,包括家庭、获得(食物和运动)的机会、相互竞争的优先事项、健康和技术知识、改变的意愿以及临床特征,将有助于根据参与者的情况定制干预措施。这些数据支持采用量身定制的方法,利用已确定的组成部分及其相互关系,确保移动医疗生活方式干预措施对不同种族和民族的癌症患者有效:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05324098;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324098。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Engaging Men of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups With Advanced Prostate Cancer in the Design of an mHealth Diet and Exercise Intervention: Focus Group Study.

Engaging Men of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups With Advanced Prostate Cancer in the Design of an mHealth Diet and Exercise Intervention: Focus Group Study.

Engaging Men of Diverse Racial and Ethnic Groups With Advanced Prostate Cancer in the Design of an mHealth Diet and Exercise Intervention: Focus Group Study.

Background: Healthy diet and exercise can improve quality of life and prognosis among men with prostate cancer. Understanding the perceived barriers to lifestyle change and patient preferences in a diverse cohort of men with prostate cancer is necessary to inform mobile health (mHealth) lifestyle interventions and increase health equity.

Objective: We conducted a multisite study to understand the preferences, attitudes, and health behaviors related to diet and lifestyle in this patient population. This report focuses on the qualitative findings from 4 web-based focus groups comprising a racially and ethnically diverse group of patients with advanced prostate cancer who are on androgen deprivation therapy.

Methods: We used grounded theory analyses including open, axial, and selective coding to generate codes. Qualitative data were analyzed as a whole rather than by focus group to optimize data saturation and the transferability of results. We present codes and themes that emerged for lifestyle intervention design and provide recommendations and considerations for future mHealth intervention studies.

Results: Overall, 14 men participated in 4 racially and ethnically concordant focus groups (African American or Black: 3/14, 21%; Asian American: 3/14, 21%; Hispanic or Latino: 3/14, 21%; and White: 5/14, 36%). Analyses converged on 7 interwoven categories: context (home environment, access, competing priorities, and lifestyle programs), motivation (accountability, discordance, feeling supported, fear, and temptation), preparedness (health literacy, technological literacy, technological preferences, trust, readiness to change, identity, adaptability, and clinical characteristics), data-driven design (education, psychosocial factors, and quality of life), program mechanics (communication, materials, customization, and being holistic), habits (eg, dietary habits), and intervention impressions. These results suggest actionable pathways to increase program intuitiveness. Recommendations for future mHealth intervention design and implementation include but are not limited to assessment at the individual, household, and neighborhood levels to support a tailored intervention; prioritization of information to disseminate based on individuals' major concerns and the delivery of information based on health and technological literacy and communication preferences; prescribing a personalized intervention based on individuals' baseline responses, home and neighborhood environment, and support network; and incorporating strategies to foster engagement (eg, responsive and relevant feedback systems) to aid participant decision-making and behavior change.

Conclusions: Assessing a patient's social context, motivation, and preparedness is necessary when tailoring a program to each patient's needs in all racial and ethnic groups. Addressing the patients' contexts and motivation and preparedness related to diet and exercise including the household, access (to food and exercise), competing priorities, health and technological literacy, readiness to change, and clinical characteristics will help to customize the intervention to the participant. These data support a tailored approach leveraging the identified components and their interrelationships to ensure that mHealth lifestyle interventions will engage and be effective in racially and ethnically diverse patients with cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05324098; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05324098.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Cancer
JMIR Cancer ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信