饮食限钠在慢性心力衰竭中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Clinical Research in Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s00392-023-02256-7
Szymon Urban, Michał Fułek, Mikołaj Błaziak, Katarzyna Fułek, Gracjan Iwanek, Maksym Jura, Magdalena Grzesiak, Oskar Szymański, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Kuba Ptaszkowski, Robert Zymlinski, Piotr Ponikowski, Jan Biegus
{"title":"饮食限钠在慢性心力衰竭中的作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Szymon Urban, Michał Fułek, Mikołaj Błaziak, Katarzyna Fułek, Gracjan Iwanek, Maksym Jura, Magdalena Grzesiak, Oskar Szymański, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Kuba Ptaszkowski, Robert Zymlinski, Piotr Ponikowski, Jan Biegus","doi":"10.1007/s00392-023-02256-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary sodium restriction remains a guidelines-approved lifestyle recommendation for chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, its efficacy in clinical outcome improvement is dubious.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study evaluated whether dietary sodium restriction in CHF reduces clinical events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the following databases: Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library (trials) to find studies analysing the impact of sodium restriction in the adult CHF population. Both observational and interventional studies were included. Exclusion criteria included i.e.: sodium consumption assessment based only on natriuresis, in-hospital interventions or mixed interventions-e.g. sodium and fluid restriction in one arm only. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed for the endpoints reported in at least 3 papers. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, we screened 9175 articles. Backward snowballing revealed 1050 additional articles. Eventually, 9 papers were evaluated in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations and the composite of mortality and hospitalisation were reported in 8, 6 and 3 articles, respectively. Sodium restriction was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]) and did not significantly affect the all-cause mortality (OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49]) or HF hospitalisation (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a meta-analysis, sodium restriction in CHF patients worsened the prognosis in terms of a composite of mortality and hospitalizations and did not influence all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371846/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of dietary sodium restriction in chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Szymon Urban, Michał Fułek, Mikołaj Błaziak, Katarzyna Fułek, Gracjan Iwanek, Maksym Jura, Magdalena Grzesiak, Oskar Szymański, Bartłomiej Stańczykiewicz, Kuba Ptaszkowski, Robert Zymlinski, Piotr Ponikowski, Jan Biegus\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-023-02256-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary sodium restriction remains a guidelines-approved lifestyle recommendation for chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, its efficacy in clinical outcome improvement is dubious.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study evaluated whether dietary sodium restriction in CHF reduces clinical events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of the following databases: Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library (trials) to find studies analysing the impact of sodium restriction in the adult CHF population. Both observational and interventional studies were included. Exclusion criteria included i.e.: sodium consumption assessment based only on natriuresis, in-hospital interventions or mixed interventions-e.g. sodium and fluid restriction in one arm only. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed for the endpoints reported in at least 3 papers. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Initially, we screened 9175 articles. Backward snowballing revealed 1050 additional articles. Eventually, 9 papers were evaluated in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations and the composite of mortality and hospitalisation were reported in 8, 6 and 3 articles, respectively. Sodium restriction was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]) and did not significantly affect the all-cause mortality (OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49]) or HF hospitalisation (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a meta-analysis, sodium restriction in CHF patients worsened the prognosis in terms of a composite of mortality and hospitalizations and did not influence all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation rate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371846/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02256-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-023-02256-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:饮食限钠仍然是指南批准的针对慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的生活方式建议。然而,它在改善临床结果方面的疗效值得怀疑:本研究评估了慢性心力衰竭患者饮食限钠是否能减少临床事件的发生:我们对以下数据库进行了系统性回顾:方法:我们对以下数据库进行了系统性回顾:Academic Search Ultimate、ERIC、Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition、MEDLINE、Embase、Clinicaltrials.gov 和 Cochrane Library(试验),以查找分析限钠对成人慢性心力衰竭人群影响的研究。观察性和干预性研究均包括在内。排除标准包括:钠消耗评估仅基于钠尿症、院内干预或混合干预--例如仅在一个臂中进行钠和液体限制。综述按照 PRISMA 指南进行。对至少 3 篇论文中报告的终点进行了 Meta 分析。分析在综述管理器(RevMan)5.4.1 版中进行:最初,我们筛选了 9175 篇文章。通过 "滚雪球 "的方式,我们又发现了 1050 篇文章。最终,在荟萃分析中评估了 9 篇论文。分别有 8 篇、6 篇和 3 篇文章报告了全因死亡率、高血压相关住院率以及死亡率和住院率的复合情况。限制钠摄入与较高的综合终点风险相关(OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]),但对全因死亡率(OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49])或心房颤动住院率(OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88])并无显著影响:在一项荟萃分析中,从死亡率和住院率的综合指标来看,CHF 患者限钠会使预后恶化,但不会影响全因死亡率和 HF 住院率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of dietary sodium restriction in chronic heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Dietary sodium restriction remains a guidelines-approved lifestyle recommendation for chronic heart failure (CHF) patients. However, its efficacy in clinical outcome improvement is dubious.

Objective: The study evaluated whether dietary sodium restriction in CHF reduces clinical events.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of the following databases: Academic Search Ultimate, ERIC, Health Source Nursing/Academic Edition, MEDLINE, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov and Cochrane Library (trials) to find studies analysing the impact of sodium restriction in the adult CHF population. Both observational and interventional studies were included. Exclusion criteria included i.e.: sodium consumption assessment based only on natriuresis, in-hospital interventions or mixed interventions-e.g. sodium and fluid restriction in one arm only. The review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Meta-analysis was performed for the endpoints reported in at least 3 papers. Analyses were conducted in Review Manager (RevMan) Version 5.4.1.

Results: Initially, we screened 9175 articles. Backward snowballing revealed 1050 additional articles. Eventually, 9 papers were evaluated in the meta-analysis. All-cause mortality, HF-related hospitalizations and the composite of mortality and hospitalisation were reported in 8, 6 and 3 articles, respectively. Sodium restriction was associated with a higher risk of the composite endpoint (OR 4.12 [95% CI 1.23-13.82]) and did not significantly affect the all-cause mortality (OR 1.38 [95% CI 0.76-2.49]) or HF hospitalisation (OR 1.63 [95% CI 0.69-3.88]).

Conclusions: In a meta-analysis, sodium restriction in CHF patients worsened the prognosis in terms of a composite of mortality and hospitalizations and did not influence all-cause mortality and HF hospitalisation rate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信