唾液取样方法。两种不同的唾液采集方法对儿童龋齿链球菌计数的影响。

Celina F Cornejo, Pablo A Salgado, Susana L Molgatini, Laura A Gliosca, Aldo F Squassi
{"title":"唾液取样方法。两种不同的唾液采集方法对儿童龋齿链球菌计数的影响。","authors":"Celina F Cornejo,&nbsp;Pablo A Salgado,&nbsp;Susana L Molgatini,&nbsp;Laura A Gliosca,&nbsp;Aldo F Squassi","doi":"10.54589/aol.35/1/51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two methods for collecting saliva samples from infants under 2 years of age for cariogenic streptococci (CS) count. Two collection methods were applied in 11 infants. In Method (A), saliva samples were collected by swabbing the inner cheek mucosa and floor of the mouth in figure of eight motions with a sterile cotton swab until it was soaked. In method (B), saliva samples were collected by aspiration of 1 ml of saliva with a sterile plastic syringe on the floor of the mouth, after stimulation with glove. The samples were cultured in modified Gold's broth (MSMG), and on trypticase, yeast extract, sucrose, cystine and bacitracin culture medium (TYSCB). In method (A), the swab with the sample was unloaded in situ on TYSCB and placed in PBS medium for transport. Then, 100 μl of the eluate was seeded in MSMG. In method (B) 100 μl were seeded in TYSCB and 100 μl in MSMG. Both culture media were incubatedundercapnophilicconditions for 48 hours at 37 °C. Colony forming units (CFU/ml) were counted by calibrated operators (kappa = 0.75). The presence of cariogenic streptococci (CS) (Streptococcus mutans-Streptococcus sobrinus) was determined by qPCR in the samples collected by both methods. The CFU/ml counts in MSMG differed significantly between methods (p = 0.021). In TYSCB, the recovery of CFU/ml was higher in method (A), without significant difference (p = 0.705). The molecular technique detected presence of CS, with no difference between collection methods. Collecting saliva samples by swabbing proved more effective in terms of recovery of microorganisms, and did not affect the detection of presence of CS by molecular techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":7033,"journal":{"name":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/af/1852-4834-35-1-51.PMC10283367.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Saliva sampling methods. Cariogenic streptococci count using two different methods of saliva collection in children.\",\"authors\":\"Celina F Cornejo,&nbsp;Pablo A Salgado,&nbsp;Susana L Molgatini,&nbsp;Laura A Gliosca,&nbsp;Aldo F Squassi\",\"doi\":\"10.54589/aol.35/1/51\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two methods for collecting saliva samples from infants under 2 years of age for cariogenic streptococci (CS) count. Two collection methods were applied in 11 infants. In Method (A), saliva samples were collected by swabbing the inner cheek mucosa and floor of the mouth in figure of eight motions with a sterile cotton swab until it was soaked. In method (B), saliva samples were collected by aspiration of 1 ml of saliva with a sterile plastic syringe on the floor of the mouth, after stimulation with glove. The samples were cultured in modified Gold's broth (MSMG), and on trypticase, yeast extract, sucrose, cystine and bacitracin culture medium (TYSCB). In method (A), the swab with the sample was unloaded in situ on TYSCB and placed in PBS medium for transport. Then, 100 μl of the eluate was seeded in MSMG. In method (B) 100 μl were seeded in TYSCB and 100 μl in MSMG. Both culture media were incubatedundercapnophilicconditions for 48 hours at 37 °C. Colony forming units (CFU/ml) were counted by calibrated operators (kappa = 0.75). The presence of cariogenic streptococci (CS) (Streptococcus mutans-Streptococcus sobrinus) was determined by qPCR in the samples collected by both methods. The CFU/ml counts in MSMG differed significantly between methods (p = 0.021). In TYSCB, the recovery of CFU/ml was higher in method (A), without significant difference (p = 0.705). The molecular technique detected presence of CS, with no difference between collection methods. Collecting saliva samples by swabbing proved more effective in terms of recovery of microorganisms, and did not affect the detection of presence of CS by molecular techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/9d/af/1852-4834-35-1-51.PMC10283367.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/51\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta odontologica latinoamericana : AOL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/1/51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是比较两种收集2岁以下婴儿唾液样本检测龋齿链球菌(CS)计数的方法的效果。11例患儿采用两种采集方法。方法(A):用无菌棉签以8字形擦拭口腔内黏膜和口腔底,直至浸透唾液。方法(B):在手套刺激后,用无菌塑料注射器在口腔底部抽吸1 ml唾液,收集唾液样本。样品分别在改良金氏肉汤(MSMG)和胰酶、酵母提取物、蔗糖、胱氨酸和杆菌肽培养基(TYSCB)上培养。在方法(A)中,将带有样品的拭子原位卸载在TYSCB上,置于PBS培养基中进行运输。然后将100 μl洗脱液投于MSMG中。方法(B)分别在TYSCB和MSMG中分别播种100 μl和100 μl。两种培养基在37°C的亲茶条件下孵育48小时。校正后的操作仪计数菌落形成单位(CFU/ml) (kappa = 0.75)。采用qPCR检测两种方法采集的样品中是否存在致龋链球菌(CS)(链球菌变形-链球菌sobrinus)。两种方法间CFU/ml计数差异有统计学意义(p = 0.021)。在TYSCB中,方法(A)的CFU/ml回收率较高,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.705)。分子技术检测到CS的存在,收集方法之间没有差异。结果表明,用拭子法收集唾液样本在微生物回收率方面更有效,并且不影响分子技术检测CS的存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Saliva sampling methods. Cariogenic streptococci count using two different methods of saliva collection in children.

Saliva sampling methods. Cariogenic streptococci count using two different methods of saliva collection in children.

Saliva sampling methods. Cariogenic streptococci count using two different methods of saliva collection in children.

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of two methods for collecting saliva samples from infants under 2 years of age for cariogenic streptococci (CS) count. Two collection methods were applied in 11 infants. In Method (A), saliva samples were collected by swabbing the inner cheek mucosa and floor of the mouth in figure of eight motions with a sterile cotton swab until it was soaked. In method (B), saliva samples were collected by aspiration of 1 ml of saliva with a sterile plastic syringe on the floor of the mouth, after stimulation with glove. The samples were cultured in modified Gold's broth (MSMG), and on trypticase, yeast extract, sucrose, cystine and bacitracin culture medium (TYSCB). In method (A), the swab with the sample was unloaded in situ on TYSCB and placed in PBS medium for transport. Then, 100 μl of the eluate was seeded in MSMG. In method (B) 100 μl were seeded in TYSCB and 100 μl in MSMG. Both culture media were incubatedundercapnophilicconditions for 48 hours at 37 °C. Colony forming units (CFU/ml) were counted by calibrated operators (kappa = 0.75). The presence of cariogenic streptococci (CS) (Streptococcus mutans-Streptococcus sobrinus) was determined by qPCR in the samples collected by both methods. The CFU/ml counts in MSMG differed significantly between methods (p = 0.021). In TYSCB, the recovery of CFU/ml was higher in method (A), without significant difference (p = 0.705). The molecular technique detected presence of CS, with no difference between collection methods. Collecting saliva samples by swabbing proved more effective in terms of recovery of microorganisms, and did not affect the detection of presence of CS by molecular techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信