第十章:口腔健康相关生活品质与冠状龋病。

Q2 Dentistry
Lyndie Foster Page, W Murray Thomson, Sarah Baker, Katrin Bekes
{"title":"第十章:口腔健康相关生活品质与冠状龋病。","authors":"Lyndie Foster Page,&nbsp;W Murray Thomson,&nbsp;Sarah Baker,&nbsp;Katrin Bekes","doi":"10.1159/000530614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dental caries is the most prevalent oral health disease and affects the health of individual and populations. The conventional disease metrics do not represent the impact of caries on people's lives. Oral-health-related quality of life measures were developed to help understand which aspects of dental caries have the greatest impact on well-being. How these measures were developed follows a standardized process of development and testing, with the ultimate aim of the entire process being that they be used in clinical dentistry, dental epidemiology, and health services research. There has been ongoing debate about whether these measures have adequate discriminative ability for the wide range of caries experience, and whether they are responsive to changes in disease experience. Whether these measures are \"perfect\" or not, what we do know after two decades is that numerous studies have found them to be sufficiently discriminative for caries in adults and children alike. There is also evidence for their responsiveness, chiefly from studies of children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthetic for early childhood caries. The influence of environmental, social, and psychological characteristics is another consideration in how people self-rate their oral health. Is there a need to improve the quality of these measures by refining existing ones or developing new ones which may represent those broader concepts? Regardless of the future, the most pressing challenge is the need for health systems work to ensure the routine use of these measures in clinical and public health practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":35771,"journal":{"name":"Monographs in Oral Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 10: Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Coronal Caries.\",\"authors\":\"Lyndie Foster Page,&nbsp;W Murray Thomson,&nbsp;Sarah Baker,&nbsp;Katrin Bekes\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000530614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Dental caries is the most prevalent oral health disease and affects the health of individual and populations. The conventional disease metrics do not represent the impact of caries on people's lives. Oral-health-related quality of life measures were developed to help understand which aspects of dental caries have the greatest impact on well-being. How these measures were developed follows a standardized process of development and testing, with the ultimate aim of the entire process being that they be used in clinical dentistry, dental epidemiology, and health services research. There has been ongoing debate about whether these measures have adequate discriminative ability for the wide range of caries experience, and whether they are responsive to changes in disease experience. Whether these measures are \\\"perfect\\\" or not, what we do know after two decades is that numerous studies have found them to be sufficiently discriminative for caries in adults and children alike. There is also evidence for their responsiveness, chiefly from studies of children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthetic for early childhood caries. The influence of environmental, social, and psychological characteristics is another consideration in how people self-rate their oral health. Is there a need to improve the quality of these measures by refining existing ones or developing new ones which may represent those broader concepts? Regardless of the future, the most pressing challenge is the need for health systems work to ensure the routine use of these measures in clinical and public health practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Monographs in Oral Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monographs in Oral Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000530614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

龋齿是最常见的口腔健康疾病,影响着个人和人群的健康。传统的疾病指标不能代表龋齿对人们生活的影响。开发了与口腔健康有关的生活质量测量方法,以帮助了解龋齿的哪些方面对健康的影响最大。这些措施的制定遵循标准化的开发和测试过程,整个过程的最终目标是将其用于临床牙科、牙科流行病学和卫生服务研究。关于这些措施是否对广泛的龋病经验具有足够的判别能力,以及它们是否对疾病经验的变化作出反应,一直存在争论。无论这些措施是否“完美”,经过20年的研究,我们知道的是,许多研究发现它们对成人和儿童的龋齿都有足够的区别。也有证据表明他们的反应性,主要来自对在全麻下接受儿童早期龋齿治疗的儿童的研究。环境、社会和心理特征的影响是人们自我评价口腔健康的另一个考虑因素。是否有必要通过改进现有措施或开发可能代表这些更广泛概念的新措施来提高这些措施的质量?无论未来如何,最紧迫的挑战是卫生系统需要努力确保在临床和公共卫生实践中常规使用这些措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chapter 10: Oral Health-Related Quality of Life and Coronal Caries.

Dental caries is the most prevalent oral health disease and affects the health of individual and populations. The conventional disease metrics do not represent the impact of caries on people's lives. Oral-health-related quality of life measures were developed to help understand which aspects of dental caries have the greatest impact on well-being. How these measures were developed follows a standardized process of development and testing, with the ultimate aim of the entire process being that they be used in clinical dentistry, dental epidemiology, and health services research. There has been ongoing debate about whether these measures have adequate discriminative ability for the wide range of caries experience, and whether they are responsive to changes in disease experience. Whether these measures are "perfect" or not, what we do know after two decades is that numerous studies have found them to be sufficiently discriminative for caries in adults and children alike. There is also evidence for their responsiveness, chiefly from studies of children undergoing dental treatment under general anesthetic for early childhood caries. The influence of environmental, social, and psychological characteristics is another consideration in how people self-rate their oral health. Is there a need to improve the quality of these measures by refining existing ones or developing new ones which may represent those broader concepts? Regardless of the future, the most pressing challenge is the need for health systems work to ensure the routine use of these measures in clinical and public health practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Monographs in Oral Science
Monographs in Oral Science Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: For two decades, ‘Monographs in Oral Science’ has provided a source of in-depth discussion of selected topics in the sciences related to stomatology. Senior investigators are invited to present expanded contributions in their fields of special expertise. The topics chosen are those which have generated a long-standing interest, and on which new conceptual insights or innovative biotechnology are making considerable impact. Authors are selected on the basis of having made lasting contributions to their chosen field and their willingness to share their findings with others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信