土耳其版心理化量表的有效性和可靠性。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Zulal Törenli Kaya, Emre Han Alpay, Şerif Türkkal Yenigüç, Gamze Özçürümez Bilgili
{"title":"土耳其版心理化量表的有效性和可靠性。","authors":"Zulal Törenli Kaya,&nbsp;Emre Han Alpay,&nbsp;Şerif Türkkal Yenigüç,&nbsp;Gamze Özçürümez Bilgili","doi":"10.5080/u25692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":47266,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552171/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-118.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS).\",\"authors\":\"Zulal Törenli Kaya,&nbsp;Emre Han Alpay,&nbsp;Şerif Türkkal Yenigüç,&nbsp;Gamze Özçürümez Bilgili\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u25692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552171/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-118.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u25692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u25692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:本研究旨在将《心理化量表》翻译成土耳其语,并考察土耳其文版本的信度和有效性。方法:615名(310名女性和305名男性)讲土耳其语的成年人被要求完成心理和情绪智力特征量表(EIFS)和边缘人格量表(BPI)。与最初的量表相似,研究结果表明了一个三因素结构,即“自我”、“他人”和“动机”。每个项目的校正总分相关性在0.28和0.52之间。MentS评分与EIFS评分呈正相关(r=0.49;P结论:研究结果表明,25项MentS土耳其语形式具有足够的心理测量特性。我们的数据支持在未来的研究中使用土耳其文版本的MentS来评估心理化能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Mentalization Scale (MentS).

Objective: This study, aims to translate the Mentalization Scale (MentS) into Turkish and investigate the reliability and validity of the Turkish version.

Method: The participants, consisting of 615 (310 female and 305 male) Turkish speaking adults, were asked to complete the MentS and the Emotional Intelligence Feature Scale-Short Form (EIFS) and the Borderline Personality Inventory (BPI).

Results: The factor structure of the scale was investigated by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Similar with the original scale, findings demonstrated a three-factor structure, namely, 'the self,' 'others' and 'motivation'. Corrected total score correlations for each item were between 0.28 and 0.52. The MentS score showed positive correlations with the EIFS score (r=0.49; p<0.001); and negative correlations with the BPI score (r=-0.37; p<0.001). Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.84 for the total score, 0.78, 0.80, and 0.79 for MentS-S, MentS-O, and MentS-M, respectively.

Conclusion: The findings show that the 25-item MentS Turkish form has sufficient psychometric properties. Our data supports the use of the Turkish version of MentS in future studies for assessment of mentalization capacity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信