心理健康恢复量表土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Rüveyda Yüksel, Hülya Arslantaş, Ferhan Dereboy, Mehtap Kizilkaya, Seher Inalkaç
{"title":"心理健康恢复量表土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性研究。","authors":"Rüveyda Yüksel,&nbsp;Hülya Arslantaş,&nbsp;Ferhan Dereboy,&nbsp;Mehtap Kizilkaya,&nbsp;Seher Inalkaç","doi":"10.5080/u26480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to translate into Turkish and investigate the validity and reliability of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 343 outpatients - and in-patients under treatment for a variety of psychiatric diagnoses at a state hospital and a university research hospital. The MHRM along with the Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SRAS), Psychological Well Being Scale (PWBS), Emotional Eating Scale (EES), and The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MHRM total score was estimated at 31.66 (sd=10.02). Exploratory factor analysis revealed one single robust factor explaining 64% of the variance of the total scores. Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.94 and corrected item-total correlation coefficients were entirely above 0.60. The MHRM scores showed positive and strong correlations with the PWBS (r=0.695; p<0.001) and SRAS (r=0.732; p<0.001), negative and strong correlation with the ISMI (r=-0.696; p<0.001) and no correlation with the EES scores (r=-0.021; p=0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data provides initial evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Turkish MHRM in evaluating the tendency for recovery of mental health consumers for clinical and research purposes. Further studies addressing psychometric properties of the scale are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":47266,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","volume":"34 2","pages":"110-117"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552175/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-110.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability Study of Mental Health Recovery Measure's Turkish Version.\",\"authors\":\"Rüveyda Yüksel,&nbsp;Hülya Arslantaş,&nbsp;Ferhan Dereboy,&nbsp;Mehtap Kizilkaya,&nbsp;Seher Inalkaç\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u26480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aims to translate into Turkish and investigate the validity and reliability of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The sample consisted of 343 outpatients - and in-patients under treatment for a variety of psychiatric diagnoses at a state hospital and a university research hospital. The MHRM along with the Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SRAS), Psychological Well Being Scale (PWBS), Emotional Eating Scale (EES), and The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean MHRM total score was estimated at 31.66 (sd=10.02). Exploratory factor analysis revealed one single robust factor explaining 64% of the variance of the total scores. Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.94 and corrected item-total correlation coefficients were entirely above 0.60. The MHRM scores showed positive and strong correlations with the PWBS (r=0.695; p<0.001) and SRAS (r=0.732; p<0.001), negative and strong correlation with the ISMI (r=-0.696; p<0.001) and no correlation with the EES scores (r=-0.021; p=0.703).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data provides initial evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Turkish MHRM in evaluating the tendency for recovery of mental health consumers for clinical and research purposes. Further studies addressing psychometric properties of the scale are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"110-117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552175/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-110.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u26480\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u26480","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在翻译成土耳其语,并调查心理健康恢复测量(MHRM)的有效性和可靠性。方法:样本包括343名在州立医院和大学研究医院接受各种精神病诊断的门诊和住院患者。MHRM与主观恢复评估量表(SRAS)、心理健康量表(PWBS)、情绪饮食量表(EES)和精神疾病内部污名量表(ISMI)。结果:MHRM的平均总分估计为31.66(sd=10.02)。探索性因素分析显示,一个单一的稳健因素解释了总分64%的方差。阿尔法内部一致性系数计算为0.94,校正项目总相关系数完全高于0.60。MHRM评分与PWBS呈正相关(r=0.695;P结论:我们的数据提供了初步证据,支持土耳其MHRM在评估临床和研究目的的心理健康消费者康复趋势方面的有效性和可靠性。有必要对量表的心理测量特性进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability Study of Mental Health Recovery Measure's Turkish Version.

Objective: The present study aims to translate into Turkish and investigate the validity and reliability of the Mental Health Recovery Measure (MHRM).

Method: The sample consisted of 343 outpatients - and in-patients under treatment for a variety of psychiatric diagnoses at a state hospital and a university research hospital. The MHRM along with the Subjective Recovery Assessment Scale (SRAS), Psychological Well Being Scale (PWBS), Emotional Eating Scale (EES), and The Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI).

Results: The mean MHRM total score was estimated at 31.66 (sd=10.02). Exploratory factor analysis revealed one single robust factor explaining 64% of the variance of the total scores. Alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.94 and corrected item-total correlation coefficients were entirely above 0.60. The MHRM scores showed positive and strong correlations with the PWBS (r=0.695; p<0.001) and SRAS (r=0.732; p<0.001), negative and strong correlation with the ISMI (r=-0.696; p<0.001) and no correlation with the EES scores (r=-0.021; p=0.703).

Conclusion: Our data provides initial evidence supporting the validity and reliability of the Turkish MHRM in evaluating the tendency for recovery of mental health consumers for clinical and research purposes. Further studies addressing psychometric properties of the scale are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信