精神分裂症和双相情感障碍I组心理理论、神经认知功能和思维语言特征之间关系的研究。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Zehra Günay Yağci, Mehmet Hamid Boztaş
{"title":"精神分裂症和双相情感障碍I组心理理论、神经认知功能和思维语言特征之间关系的研究。","authors":"Zehra Günay Yağci,&nbsp;Mehmet Hamid Boztaş","doi":"10.5080/u26401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship of ToM with face-emotion recognition, executive functions and thought disorders in the schizophrenia (SC) and bipolar affective disorder I (BAD I) groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>40 SC, 40 BAD I and 40 healthy control groups were included, matched for age, gender, and educational status. Dokuz Eylül Theory of Mind Scale (DEToMS)) and Reading Mind in Eyes (RMET) test, Benton face recognition test (BFRT), Ekman emotion recognition battery, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop test, Thought and Language Index (TLI) were used. Positive and Negative Symptoms Rating Scale (PANNS) in the SZ group, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in the BAD I group were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of perseverative responses in WSCT was higher in the SC group than the BAD I group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in healthy controls more than patients group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in BAD I group more than SC group. There was no difference between SC and BAD I groups between BFRT, emotion recognition except fearful expression and RMET scores. The best predictors of DEToMS were executive functions and TLI total score in the SC group and was emotion recognition in the BAD I group. The best predictors of the RMET score were executive functions and emotion recognition for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that social cognition remains a biomarker in patients with SZ and BAD I.</p>","PeriodicalId":47266,"journal":{"name":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","volume":"34 2","pages":"68-79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552173/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-68.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examination of the Relationship Between the Theory of Mind, Neurocognitive Functions and Thought-Language Features in the Schizophrenia and Bipolar Affective Disorder I Groups.\",\"authors\":\"Zehra Günay Yağci,&nbsp;Mehmet Hamid Boztaş\",\"doi\":\"10.5080/u26401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship of ToM with face-emotion recognition, executive functions and thought disorders in the schizophrenia (SC) and bipolar affective disorder I (BAD I) groups.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>40 SC, 40 BAD I and 40 healthy control groups were included, matched for age, gender, and educational status. Dokuz Eylül Theory of Mind Scale (DEToMS)) and Reading Mind in Eyes (RMET) test, Benton face recognition test (BFRT), Ekman emotion recognition battery, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop test, Thought and Language Index (TLI) were used. Positive and Negative Symptoms Rating Scale (PANNS) in the SZ group, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in the BAD I group were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of perseverative responses in WSCT was higher in the SC group than the BAD I group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in healthy controls more than patients group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in BAD I group more than SC group. There was no difference between SC and BAD I groups between BFRT, emotion recognition except fearful expression and RMET scores. The best predictors of DEToMS were executive functions and TLI total score in the SC group and was emotion recognition in the BAD I group. The best predictors of the RMET score were executive functions and emotion recognition for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that social cognition remains a biomarker in patients with SZ and BAD I.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47266,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"68-79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10552173/pdf/turkpsychiatry-34-68.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5080/u26401\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turk Psikiyatri Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5080/u26401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在探讨精神分裂症(SC)和双相情感障碍I(BAD I)患者的ToM与面部情绪识别、执行功能和思维障碍的关系。方法:纳入40个SC、40个BAD I和40个健康对照组,根据年龄、性别和教育状况进行匹配。Dokuz-Eylül心理量表理论(DEToMS))和眼睛阅读心理(RMET)测试、Benton人脸识别测试(BFRT)、Ekman情绪识别电池、威斯康星卡片分类测试(WCST)、Stroop测试、思维和语言指数(TLI)。SZ组采用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANNS),BAD I组采用青年躁狂量表(YMRS)。结果:SC组的WSCT持续反应次数高于BAD I组。与患者组相比,健康对照组的恐惧表达识别评分、DEToMS总分和除反讽外的分量表评分更高,TLI评分更低。BAD I组的恐惧表情识别得分、DEToMS总分和除反讽外的分量表得分均高于SC组,TLI得分较低。SC组和BAD I组在BFRT、除恐惧表情外的情绪识别和RMET评分之间没有差异。DEToMS的最佳预测因素是SC组的执行功能和TLI总分,BAD I组的情绪识别。RMET评分的最佳预测因素是两组的执行功能和情绪识别。结论:我们的研究结果表明,社会认知仍然是SZ和BAD I患者的生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Examination of the Relationship Between the Theory of Mind, Neurocognitive Functions and Thought-Language Features in the Schizophrenia and Bipolar Affective Disorder I Groups.

Objective: In this study, it was aimed to examine the relationship of ToM with face-emotion recognition, executive functions and thought disorders in the schizophrenia (SC) and bipolar affective disorder I (BAD I) groups.

Method: 40 SC, 40 BAD I and 40 healthy control groups were included, matched for age, gender, and educational status. Dokuz Eylül Theory of Mind Scale (DEToMS)) and Reading Mind in Eyes (RMET) test, Benton face recognition test (BFRT), Ekman emotion recognition battery, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), Stroop test, Thought and Language Index (TLI) were used. Positive and Negative Symptoms Rating Scale (PANNS) in the SZ group, Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) in the BAD I group were used.

Results: The number of perseverative responses in WSCT was higher in the SC group than the BAD I group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in healthy controls more than patients group. Recognition of the fearful expression scores, DEToMS total and subscale scores except irony were higher and scores of TLI were lower in BAD I group more than SC group. There was no difference between SC and BAD I groups between BFRT, emotion recognition except fearful expression and RMET scores. The best predictors of DEToMS were executive functions and TLI total score in the SC group and was emotion recognition in the BAD I group. The best predictors of the RMET score were executive functions and emotion recognition for both groups.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that social cognition remains a biomarker in patients with SZ and BAD I.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信