Satinderjit Locham, Alejandra Rodriguez, Mark D Balceniuk, Doran Mix, Karina Newhall, Adam Doyle, Roan Glocker, Jennifer Ellis, Michael Stoner
{"title":"接受外周血管介入治疗的高危患者的对比剂相关急性肾损伤","authors":"Satinderjit Locham, Alejandra Rodriguez, Mark D Balceniuk, Doran Mix, Karina Newhall, Adam Doyle, Roan Glocker, Jennifer Ellis, Michael Stoner","doi":"10.1177/15385744231162941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the use of prophylactic intravenous hydration (IV prophylaxis) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) angiography in reducing contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and determine the overall incidence and risk factors of CA-AKI in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). <b>Method:</b> Only patients undergoing elective PVI from 2017 to 2021 with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database were included. Patients were grouped into IV prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis. The study's primary outcome was CA-AKI, defined as a rise in creatinine (>.5 mg/dL) or new dialysis within 48 hours following contrast administration. Standard univariate and multivariable (logistic regression) analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> A total of 4497 patients were identified. Of these, 65% received IV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of CA-AKI was .93%. No significant difference was seen in overall contrast volume (mean (SD): 66.89(49.54) vs 65.94(51.97) milliliters, <i>P</i> > .05) between the 2 groups. After adjusting for significant covariates, the use of IV prophylaxis (OR (95% CI): 1.54(.77-3.18), <i>P</i> = .25) and CO<sub>2</sub> angiography (OR (95%CI): .95(.44-2.08), <i>P</i> = .90) was not associated with a significant reduction in CA-AKI compared to the patients with no prophylaxis. The severity of CKD and diabetes were the only predictor of CA-AKI. Compared to patients with no CA-AKI, patients with CA-AKI were at risk of higher 30-day mortality (OR (95% CI): 11.09 (4.25-28.93)) and cardiopulmonary complications (OR (95% CI): 19.03 (8.74-41.39) following PVI (Both <i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion</b><b>:</b> Using a large national vascular database, our study demonstrates that prophylactic use of IV hydration and CO<sub>2</sub> angiography in high-risk CKD patients is not associated with a reduction in renal injury following PVI. Reduced kidney function and history of diabetes is an independent predictor of CA-AKI and patients that develop post-procedural AKI are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":23530,"journal":{"name":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast-Associated Acute Kidney Injury in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Satinderjit Locham, Alejandra Rodriguez, Mark D Balceniuk, Doran Mix, Karina Newhall, Adam Doyle, Roan Glocker, Jennifer Ellis, Michael Stoner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15385744231162941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aims to evaluate the use of prophylactic intravenous hydration (IV prophylaxis) and carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) angiography in reducing contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and determine the overall incidence and risk factors of CA-AKI in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). <b>Method:</b> Only patients undergoing elective PVI from 2017 to 2021 with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database were included. Patients were grouped into IV prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis. The study's primary outcome was CA-AKI, defined as a rise in creatinine (>.5 mg/dL) or new dialysis within 48 hours following contrast administration. Standard univariate and multivariable (logistic regression) analyses were conducted. <b>Results:</b> A total of 4497 patients were identified. Of these, 65% received IV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of CA-AKI was .93%. No significant difference was seen in overall contrast volume (mean (SD): 66.89(49.54) vs 65.94(51.97) milliliters, <i>P</i> > .05) between the 2 groups. After adjusting for significant covariates, the use of IV prophylaxis (OR (95% CI): 1.54(.77-3.18), <i>P</i> = .25) and CO<sub>2</sub> angiography (OR (95%CI): .95(.44-2.08), <i>P</i> = .90) was not associated with a significant reduction in CA-AKI compared to the patients with no prophylaxis. The severity of CKD and diabetes were the only predictor of CA-AKI. Compared to patients with no CA-AKI, patients with CA-AKI were at risk of higher 30-day mortality (OR (95% CI): 11.09 (4.25-28.93)) and cardiopulmonary complications (OR (95% CI): 19.03 (8.74-41.39) following PVI (Both <i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusion</b><b>:</b> Using a large national vascular database, our study demonstrates that prophylactic use of IV hydration and CO<sub>2</sub> angiography in high-risk CKD patients is not associated with a reduction in renal injury following PVI. Reduced kidney function and history of diabetes is an independent predictor of CA-AKI and patients that develop post-procedural AKI are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231162941\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15385744231162941","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评估预防性静脉补液(IV prolaxis)和二氧化碳(CO2)血管造影在降低造影剂相关急性肾损伤(CA-AKI)中的应用,并确定接受外周血管干预(PVI)的高危患者CA-AKI的总发病率和危险因素。方法:仅纳入血管质量倡议(VQI)数据库中2017年至2021年接受选择性PVI的慢性肾脏疾病(CKD) 3-5期患者。患者分为静脉预防组和不预防组。该研究的主要结局是CA-AKI,定义为肌酐升高(>。5 mg/dL)或在给药后48小时内进行新的透析。进行了标准的单变量和多变量(逻辑回归)分析。结果:共发现4497例患者。其中,65%接受静脉注射预防。CA-AKI的总发生率为0.93%。两组总对比体积(SD均值:66.89(49.54)vs 65.94(51.97) ml, P > 0.05)差异无统计学意义。在调整重要协变量后,与未进行预防的患者相比,静脉预防(OR (95%CI): 1.54(0.77 -3.18), P = 0.25)和CO2血管造影(OR (95%CI): 0.95 (0.44 -2.08), P = 0.90)的使用与CA-AKI的显著降低无关。CKD和糖尿病的严重程度是CA-AKI的唯一预测因子。与无CA-AKI患者相比,CA-AKI患者在PVI后30天死亡率(OR (95% CI): 11.09(4.25-28.93))和心肺并发症(OR (95% CI): 19.03(8.74-41.39)的风险更高(均P < 0.001)。结论:通过一个大型的国家血管数据库,我们的研究表明,高危CKD患者预防性使用静脉水化和CO2血管造影与PVI后肾损伤的减少无关。肾功能降低和糖尿病史是CA-AKI的独立预测因素,术后AKI患者的发病率和死亡率增加。
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the use of prophylactic intravenous hydration (IV prophylaxis) and carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography in reducing contrast associated-acute kidney injury (CA-AKI) and determine the overall incidence and risk factors of CA-AKI in high-risk patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions (PVI). Method: Only patients undergoing elective PVI from 2017 to 2021 with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3-5 in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database were included. Patients were grouped into IV prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis. The study's primary outcome was CA-AKI, defined as a rise in creatinine (>.5 mg/dL) or new dialysis within 48 hours following contrast administration. Standard univariate and multivariable (logistic regression) analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 4497 patients were identified. Of these, 65% received IV prophylaxis. The overall incidence of CA-AKI was .93%. No significant difference was seen in overall contrast volume (mean (SD): 66.89(49.54) vs 65.94(51.97) milliliters, P > .05) between the 2 groups. After adjusting for significant covariates, the use of IV prophylaxis (OR (95% CI): 1.54(.77-3.18), P = .25) and CO2 angiography (OR (95%CI): .95(.44-2.08), P = .90) was not associated with a significant reduction in CA-AKI compared to the patients with no prophylaxis. The severity of CKD and diabetes were the only predictor of CA-AKI. Compared to patients with no CA-AKI, patients with CA-AKI were at risk of higher 30-day mortality (OR (95% CI): 11.09 (4.25-28.93)) and cardiopulmonary complications (OR (95% CI): 19.03 (8.74-41.39) following PVI (Both P < .001). Conclusion: Using a large national vascular database, our study demonstrates that prophylactic use of IV hydration and CO2 angiography in high-risk CKD patients is not associated with a reduction in renal injury following PVI. Reduced kidney function and history of diabetes is an independent predictor of CA-AKI and patients that develop post-procedural AKI are at an increased risk of morbidity and mortality.
期刊介绍:
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery (VES) is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes information to guide vascular specialists in endovascular, surgical, and medical treatment of vascular disease. VES contains original scientific articles on vascular intervention, including new endovascular therapies for peripheral artery, aneurysm, carotid, and venous conditions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).