SARS-CoV-2和过敏——两年半后我们学到了什么?

Knut Brockow, Rosi Wang, Sonja Mathes, Rebekka Bent, Valentina Faihs, Bernadette Eberlein, Ulf Darsow, Tilo Biedermann
{"title":"SARS-CoV-2和过敏——两年半后我们学到了什么?","authors":"Knut Brockow,&nbsp;Rosi Wang,&nbsp;Sonja Mathes,&nbsp;Rebekka Bent,&nbsp;Valentina Faihs,&nbsp;Bernadette Eberlein,&nbsp;Ulf Darsow,&nbsp;Tilo Biedermann","doi":"10.5414/ALX02373E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is needed for protection against severe infection. Skin reactions may arise with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Short-term general immune reactions and skin reactions are also possible upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, they recur in only a proportion of patients during follow-up vaccinations. Initial reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination fueled public fear. On the other hand, more recent epidemiologic data do not show a substantially increased anaphylaxis risk compared with other vaccines. Fear-related reactions may be essential for many \"anaphylaxis\" reports. In Germany, the flow chart developed by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) and Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) together with the allergological societies helps to care for patients with suspected \"allergy history\" safely and effectively. Through this, patients with increased risk of anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and their ingredients (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80) are identified. However, since only small amounts of these excipients are contained in mRNA vaccines, even some PEG-allergic patients can tolerate the vaccination. In Germany, an allergy test-guided procedure is recommended for high-risk patients, including an allergy history, prick tests, intradermal and basophil activation tests, and, if necessary, provocation tests. This also appears effective for anxiety reduction in patients with vaccination skepticism. To date, all of our patients have been able to be vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines without the occurrence of significant reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many initial concerns about unexpected side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have not been confirmed. The flowchart and, in the case of suspicion of hypersensitivity, an allergy test-guided risk assessment helps to reduce patients' fear of vaccination and enables safe vaccination.</p>","PeriodicalId":7485,"journal":{"name":"Allergologie Select","volume":"7 ","pages":"101-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088874/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SARS-CoV-2 and allergy - what have we learned after two and a half years?\",\"authors\":\"Knut Brockow,&nbsp;Rosi Wang,&nbsp;Sonja Mathes,&nbsp;Rebekka Bent,&nbsp;Valentina Faihs,&nbsp;Bernadette Eberlein,&nbsp;Ulf Darsow,&nbsp;Tilo Biedermann\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/ALX02373E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is needed for protection against severe infection. Skin reactions may arise with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Short-term general immune reactions and skin reactions are also possible upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, they recur in only a proportion of patients during follow-up vaccinations. Initial reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination fueled public fear. On the other hand, more recent epidemiologic data do not show a substantially increased anaphylaxis risk compared with other vaccines. Fear-related reactions may be essential for many \\\"anaphylaxis\\\" reports. In Germany, the flow chart developed by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) and Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) together with the allergological societies helps to care for patients with suspected \\\"allergy history\\\" safely and effectively. Through this, patients with increased risk of anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and their ingredients (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80) are identified. However, since only small amounts of these excipients are contained in mRNA vaccines, even some PEG-allergic patients can tolerate the vaccination. In Germany, an allergy test-guided procedure is recommended for high-risk patients, including an allergy history, prick tests, intradermal and basophil activation tests, and, if necessary, provocation tests. This also appears effective for anxiety reduction in patients with vaccination skepticism. To date, all of our patients have been able to be vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines without the occurrence of significant reactions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many initial concerns about unexpected side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have not been confirmed. The flowchart and, in the case of suspicion of hypersensitivity, an allergy test-guided risk assessment helps to reduce patients' fear of vaccination and enables safe vaccination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Allergologie Select\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"101-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10088874/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Allergologie Select\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02373E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergologie Select","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/ALX02373E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)严重阻碍了过敏症专科医生和过敏科的正常工作流程。材料和方法:本综述的目的是突出我们自己在SARS-CoV-2和过敏方面的经验,并讨论文献的发现。结果:预防严重感染需要接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗。感染SARS-CoV-2可能会出现皮肤反应。在接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗后,也可能出现短期一般免疫反应和皮肤反应;然而,只有一部分患者在后续接种期间复发。接种疫苗后过敏反应的初步报告加剧了公众的恐惧。另一方面,最近的流行病学数据显示,与其他疫苗相比,过敏反应风险并未显著增加。恐惧相关的反应可能是许多“过敏反应”报告所必需的。在德国,由保罗-埃利希研究所(PEI)和罗伯特-科赫研究所(RKI)与过敏学会共同开发的流程图有助于安全有效地照顾疑似“过敏史”的患者。通过这种方法,可以确定对SARS-CoV-2疫苗及其成分(例如聚乙二醇(PEG)、聚山梨醇酯80)产生过敏反应风险增加的患者。然而,由于mRNA疫苗中只含有少量这些赋形剂,即使是一些peg过敏患者也能耐受疫苗接种。在德国,建议对高危患者进行过敏试验指导程序,包括过敏史、点刺试验、皮内和嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验,以及必要时的激发试验。这对疫苗接种怀疑患者的焦虑减轻似乎也有效。迄今为止,我们所有的患者都能够接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗,而没有发生明显的反应。结论:许多最初关于SARS-CoV-2疫苗意外副作用的担忧尚未得到证实。流程图和在怀疑过敏的情况下,过敏试验指导的风险评估有助于减少患者对疫苗接种的恐惧,并使疫苗接种安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

SARS-CoV-2 and allergy - what have we learned after two and a half years?

SARS-CoV-2 and allergy - what have we learned after two and a half years?

SARS-CoV-2 and allergy - what have we learned after two and a half years?

Background: Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) has significantly hampered the regular workflow for allergists and allergy departments.

Materials and methods: The purpose of this review is to highlight our own experiences on SARS-CoV-2 and allergy as well as to discuss findings from the literature.

Results: Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is needed for protection against severe infection. Skin reactions may arise with SARS-CoV-2 infections. Short-term general immune reactions and skin reactions are also possible upon SARS-CoV-2 vaccination; however, they recur in only a proportion of patients during follow-up vaccinations. Initial reports of anaphylaxis after vaccination fueled public fear. On the other hand, more recent epidemiologic data do not show a substantially increased anaphylaxis risk compared with other vaccines. Fear-related reactions may be essential for many "anaphylaxis" reports. In Germany, the flow chart developed by Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) and Robert-Koch-Institut (RKI) together with the allergological societies helps to care for patients with suspected "allergy history" safely and effectively. Through this, patients with increased risk of anaphylaxis to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and their ingredients (e.g., polyethylene glycol (PEG), polysorbate 80) are identified. However, since only small amounts of these excipients are contained in mRNA vaccines, even some PEG-allergic patients can tolerate the vaccination. In Germany, an allergy test-guided procedure is recommended for high-risk patients, including an allergy history, prick tests, intradermal and basophil activation tests, and, if necessary, provocation tests. This also appears effective for anxiety reduction in patients with vaccination skepticism. To date, all of our patients have been able to be vaccinated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines without the occurrence of significant reactions.

Conclusion: Many initial concerns about unexpected side effects of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have not been confirmed. The flowchart and, in the case of suspicion of hypersensitivity, an allergy test-guided risk assessment helps to reduce patients' fear of vaccination and enables safe vaccination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信