食品安全,私人标准计划和贸易:FDA食品安全现代化法案的含义

John Humphrey
{"title":"食品安全,私人标准计划和贸易:FDA食品安全现代化法案的含义","authors":"John Humphrey","doi":"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Food safety standards for the production of fruit and vegetables that are developed and administered by private sector actors have become a common requirement for producers and exporters of fresh produce in the past two decades. Instead of relying on inspection after produce has been harvested, preventive controls identify sources of food safety risks and introduce procedures to eliminate them or reduce them to acceptable levels. This approach has been criticised for its reliance on controls over the way food is produced and the use of third-party certification to monitor and enforce compliance. The criticisms frequently imply that public controls over production and trade of fresh produce are less onerous and more science-based. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), passed by the US Congress in January 2011, adds a new element to the discussion of private standards. In a radical departure from past practice it introduces mandatory on-farm preventive controls on US farms for those categories of fresh produce for which the risks to human health from food borne illness outbreaks are considered substantial. Food imported into the United States must be shown to have been produced to an equivalent level of safety, and the responsibility to verify this is placed on food importers. The use of preventive controls backed up by audit and inspection moves US public regulations much closer to the approach used by private standards developers and adopters.</p>\n <p>This paper compares and contrasts the development of private standards in Europe and the approach developed by the FSMA. It uses the framework of different regulatory strategies – performance-based, technology-based and management based – to analyse the regulatory choices made in both cases and their implications for producers and exporters in developing countries. It argues that the adoption of mandatory on-farm controls by the FSMA reflects the seriousness of microbial contamination of fresh produce as a food safety risk and the shortcomings of performance-based regulation. The impacts on exporters will be similar to the impact of private standards. The nature of these impacts will depend, first, upon the choice of on-farm controls by the FDA for domestic production in the United States and the balance between technology-based and management-based regulation. The second factor is how the FDA will determine whether private standards and public regulations in exporting countries provide an equivalent level of safety to that in the US.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100618,"journal":{"name":"IDS Working Papers","volume":"2012 403","pages":"1-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Safety, Private Standards Schemes and Trade: The Implications of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act\",\"authors\":\"John Humphrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Food safety standards for the production of fruit and vegetables that are developed and administered by private sector actors have become a common requirement for producers and exporters of fresh produce in the past two decades. Instead of relying on inspection after produce has been harvested, preventive controls identify sources of food safety risks and introduce procedures to eliminate them or reduce them to acceptable levels. This approach has been criticised for its reliance on controls over the way food is produced and the use of third-party certification to monitor and enforce compliance. The criticisms frequently imply that public controls over production and trade of fresh produce are less onerous and more science-based. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), passed by the US Congress in January 2011, adds a new element to the discussion of private standards. In a radical departure from past practice it introduces mandatory on-farm preventive controls on US farms for those categories of fresh produce for which the risks to human health from food borne illness outbreaks are considered substantial. Food imported into the United States must be shown to have been produced to an equivalent level of safety, and the responsibility to verify this is placed on food importers. The use of preventive controls backed up by audit and inspection moves US public regulations much closer to the approach used by private standards developers and adopters.</p>\\n <p>This paper compares and contrasts the development of private standards in Europe and the approach developed by the FSMA. It uses the framework of different regulatory strategies – performance-based, technology-based and management based – to analyse the regulatory choices made in both cases and their implications for producers and exporters in developing countries. It argues that the adoption of mandatory on-farm controls by the FSMA reflects the seriousness of microbial contamination of fresh produce as a food safety risk and the shortcomings of performance-based regulation. The impacts on exporters will be similar to the impact of private standards. The nature of these impacts will depend, first, upon the choice of on-farm controls by the FDA for domestic production in the United States and the balance between technology-based and management-based regulation. The second factor is how the FDA will determine whether private standards and public regulations in exporting countries provide an equivalent level of safety to that in the US.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IDS Working Papers\",\"volume\":\"2012 403\",\"pages\":\"1-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IDS Working Papers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDS Working Papers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2012.00403.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在过去二十年中,由私营部门行为者制定和管理的水果和蔬菜生产食品安全标准已成为新鲜农产品生产商和出口商的共同要求。预防性控制不是依靠农产品收获后的检查,而是识别食品安全风险的来源,并引入消除风险或将风险降低到可接受水平的程序。这种方法一直受到批评,因为它依赖于对食品生产方式的控制,并使用第三方认证来监督和执行合规。这些批评经常暗示,对新鲜农产品生产和贸易的公共控制不那么繁重,而且更以科学为基础。美国国会于2011年1月通过的FDA食品安全现代化法案(FSMA)为私人标准的讨论增加了新的元素。该法案彻底改变了过去的做法,对那些被认为对人类健康有重大风险的食源性疾病爆发的新鲜农产品,在美国农场引入了强制性的农场预防性控制措施。进口到美国的食品必须证明是按照同等安全水平生产的,食品进口商有责任对此进行核实。采用以审计和检查为后盾的预防性控制措施,使美国公共监管更接近于私营部门标准开发者和采用者所采用的方法。本文比较和对比了欧洲私人标准的发展和FSMA制定的方法。它使用不同的管理战略框架——基于绩效的、基于技术的和基于管理的——来分析在这两种情况下做出的管理选择及其对发展中国家生产者和出口商的影响。它认为,FSMA对农场强制控制的采用反映了新鲜农产品微生物污染作为食品安全风险的严重性,以及基于绩效的监管的缺点。对出口商的影响将类似于私人标准的影响。这些影响的性质将首先取决于FDA对美国国内生产的农场控制的选择,以及基于技术和基于管理的监管之间的平衡。第二个因素是FDA将如何确定出口国的私人标准和公共法规是否提供与美国同等水平的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Safety, Private Standards Schemes and Trade: The Implications of the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act

Food safety standards for the production of fruit and vegetables that are developed and administered by private sector actors have become a common requirement for producers and exporters of fresh produce in the past two decades. Instead of relying on inspection after produce has been harvested, preventive controls identify sources of food safety risks and introduce procedures to eliminate them or reduce them to acceptable levels. This approach has been criticised for its reliance on controls over the way food is produced and the use of third-party certification to monitor and enforce compliance. The criticisms frequently imply that public controls over production and trade of fresh produce are less onerous and more science-based. The FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), passed by the US Congress in January 2011, adds a new element to the discussion of private standards. In a radical departure from past practice it introduces mandatory on-farm preventive controls on US farms for those categories of fresh produce for which the risks to human health from food borne illness outbreaks are considered substantial. Food imported into the United States must be shown to have been produced to an equivalent level of safety, and the responsibility to verify this is placed on food importers. The use of preventive controls backed up by audit and inspection moves US public regulations much closer to the approach used by private standards developers and adopters.

This paper compares and contrasts the development of private standards in Europe and the approach developed by the FSMA. It uses the framework of different regulatory strategies – performance-based, technology-based and management based – to analyse the regulatory choices made in both cases and their implications for producers and exporters in developing countries. It argues that the adoption of mandatory on-farm controls by the FSMA reflects the seriousness of microbial contamination of fresh produce as a food safety risk and the shortcomings of performance-based regulation. The impacts on exporters will be similar to the impact of private standards. The nature of these impacts will depend, first, upon the choice of on-farm controls by the FDA for domestic production in the United States and the balance between technology-based and management-based regulation. The second factor is how the FDA will determine whether private standards and public regulations in exporting countries provide an equivalent level of safety to that in the US.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信