对血源性病原体传播的病毒感染危险因素态度的横断面研究。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Sunčica Ivanović, Sanja Trgovčević, Milena Cvetković Jovanović, Biljana Kocić, Suzana Milutinović
{"title":"对血源性病原体传播的病毒感染危险因素态度的横断面研究。","authors":"Sunčica Ivanović,&nbsp;Sanja Trgovčević,&nbsp;Milena Cvetković Jovanović,&nbsp;Biljana Kocić,&nbsp;Suzana Milutinović","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":21229,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081622/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Cross-Sectional Study of attitudes towards risk factors of viral infections transmitted by blood-borne pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Sunčica Ivanović,&nbsp;Sanja Trgovčević,&nbsp;Milena Cvetković Jovanović,&nbsp;Biljana Kocić,&nbsp;Suzana Milutinović\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10081622/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2022-0097en","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:本研究的目的有三个方面:评估工作场所员工血源性病原体暴露和病毒感染的危险因素,发现未暴露人群与血源性感染人群之间的差异,并确定主要风险预测因素。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对塞尔维亚紧急医疗服务研究所203名符合研究条件的员工进行调查,并采用先前开发的问卷进行调查。结果:97.60%的应答者意识到其工作场所存在风险,但HIV、HbcAg和Anti-HCV检测数量较少,乙肝疫苗接种率较低。各应答者对乙肝的态度差异无统计学意义。三个变量为预测因子:意外使用针头刺伤(OR = 90.34;95% CI, 8.79-928.03),通过皮肤接触患者血液(OR = 176.94;95% CI, 24.95-1254.61)和服务年限(OR = 0.92;95% ci, 0.86-1.00)。结论:这项研究的意义在于它指出了双重风险,因为不仅卫生工作者受到威胁,接受急救的公民也受到威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Cross-Sectional Study of attitudes towards risk factors of viral infections transmitted by blood-borne pathogens.

Objective: The objective of this paper was threefold: To assess risk factors of blood-borne pathogen exposure and viral infection for employees at their workplace, to spot the differences between groups of respondents without exposure and those exposed to blood-borne infections, and to identify main risk predictors.

Method: The Cross-Sectional Study was conducted, surveying 203 employees, at the Institute for Emergency Medical Services in Serbia, which were eligible to enter the study and surveyed by Previously Developed Questionnaire.

Results: A total of 97.60% of respondents have perceived risk at their workplace, but there were low numbers of HIV, HbcAg, and Anti-HCV testing and poor percent of vaccination for hepatitis B. There were no statistically significant differences between spotted groups of respondents in their attitudes. Three variables were predictors: accidental usedneedle stick injuries (OR = 90.34; 95% CI, 8.79-928.03), contact with the blood of patientsthrough the skin (OR = 176.94; 95% CI, 24.95-1254.61), and the years of service (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86-1.00).

Conclusion: The significance of this study is that it points to a double risk, because not only health workers are endangered, but also citizens who receive first aid.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
254
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The University of São Paulo Nursing School Journal (Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, REEUSP) is a bimonthly periodical revised by fellow nurses, which has the objective of publishing empirical or theoretical articles that represent a significant advance for the professional practice or for the fundaments of Nursing Mission: to stimulate knowledge production and dissemination in Nursing and related areas, focusing on international interlocution to advance Nursing science. Areas of Interest: Nursing and Health Its abbreviated title is Rev Esc Enferm USP, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信