Marco Panizzolo , Marta Gea , Elisabetta Carraro , Giorgio Gilli , Silvia Bonetta , Cristina Pignata
{"title":"饮用水中人类致病病毒的发生及其来源","authors":"Marco Panizzolo , Marta Gea , Elisabetta Carraro , Giorgio Gilli , Silvia Bonetta , Cristina Pignata","doi":"10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Since many waterborne diseases are caused by human pathogenic viruses, virus monitoring of drinking water (DW) and DW sources is crucial for public health. Therefore, the aim of this review was to describe the occurrence of human pathogenic viruses in DW and DW sources; the occurrence of two viruses proposed as novel indicators of human faecal contamination (</span><em>Pepper mild mottle virus</em> and <em>Tobacco mosaic virus</em><span>) was also reported. This research was focused on articles that assessed viral occurrence using molecular methods in the surface water used for DW production<span><span> (SW-D), groundwater used for DW production (GW-D), DW and bottled-DW (BW). A total of 1544 studies published in the last 10 years were analysed, and 79 were ultimately included. In considering the detection methods, filtration is the most common concentration technique, while quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most common quantification technique. Regarding virus occurrence in SW-D, GW-D, and DW, high percentages of positive samples were reported for </span>adenovirus, polyomavirus and </span></span><em>Pepper mild mottle virus</em><span>. Viral genomes were frequently detected in SW-D and rarely in GW-D, suggesting that GW-D may be a safe DW source. Viral genomes were also detected in DW, posing a possible threat to human health. The lowest percentages of positive samples were found in Europe, while the highest were found in Asia and South America. Only three articles assessed viral occurrence in BW. This review highlights the lack of method standardization and the need for legislation updates.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":15774,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental sciences","volume":"132 ","pages":"Pages 145-161"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occurrence of human pathogenic viruses in drinking water and in its sources: A review\",\"authors\":\"Marco Panizzolo , Marta Gea , Elisabetta Carraro , Giorgio Gilli , Silvia Bonetta , Cristina Pignata\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jes.2022.07.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Since many waterborne diseases are caused by human pathogenic viruses, virus monitoring of drinking water (DW) and DW sources is crucial for public health. Therefore, the aim of this review was to describe the occurrence of human pathogenic viruses in DW and DW sources; the occurrence of two viruses proposed as novel indicators of human faecal contamination (</span><em>Pepper mild mottle virus</em> and <em>Tobacco mosaic virus</em><span>) was also reported. This research was focused on articles that assessed viral occurrence using molecular methods in the surface water used for DW production<span><span> (SW-D), groundwater used for DW production (GW-D), DW and bottled-DW (BW). A total of 1544 studies published in the last 10 years were analysed, and 79 were ultimately included. In considering the detection methods, filtration is the most common concentration technique, while quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most common quantification technique. Regarding virus occurrence in SW-D, GW-D, and DW, high percentages of positive samples were reported for </span>adenovirus, polyomavirus and </span></span><em>Pepper mild mottle virus</em><span>. Viral genomes were frequently detected in SW-D and rarely in GW-D, suggesting that GW-D may be a safe DW source. Viral genomes were also detected in DW, posing a possible threat to human health. The lowest percentages of positive samples were found in Europe, while the highest were found in Asia and South America. Only three articles assessed viral occurrence in BW. This review highlights the lack of method standardization and the need for legislation updates.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of environmental sciences\",\"volume\":\"132 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 145-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of environmental sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1089\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222003886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1089","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1001074222003886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
Occurrence of human pathogenic viruses in drinking water and in its sources: A review
Since many waterborne diseases are caused by human pathogenic viruses, virus monitoring of drinking water (DW) and DW sources is crucial for public health. Therefore, the aim of this review was to describe the occurrence of human pathogenic viruses in DW and DW sources; the occurrence of two viruses proposed as novel indicators of human faecal contamination (Pepper mild mottle virus and Tobacco mosaic virus) was also reported. This research was focused on articles that assessed viral occurrence using molecular methods in the surface water used for DW production (SW-D), groundwater used for DW production (GW-D), DW and bottled-DW (BW). A total of 1544 studies published in the last 10 years were analysed, and 79 were ultimately included. In considering the detection methods, filtration is the most common concentration technique, while quantitative polymerase chain reaction is the most common quantification technique. Regarding virus occurrence in SW-D, GW-D, and DW, high percentages of positive samples were reported for adenovirus, polyomavirus and Pepper mild mottle virus. Viral genomes were frequently detected in SW-D and rarely in GW-D, suggesting that GW-D may be a safe DW source. Viral genomes were also detected in DW, posing a possible threat to human health. The lowest percentages of positive samples were found in Europe, while the highest were found in Asia and South America. Only three articles assessed viral occurrence in BW. This review highlights the lack of method standardization and the need for legislation updates.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Environmental Sciences is an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1989. It is sponsored by the Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, and it is jointly published by Elsevier and Science Press. It aims to foster interdisciplinary communication and promote understanding of significant environmental issues. The journal seeks to publish significant and novel research on the fate and behaviour of emerging contaminants, human impact on the environment, human exposure to environmental contaminants and their health effects, and environmental remediation and management. Original research articles, critical reviews, highlights, and perspectives of high quality are published both in print and online.