Stephanie Jarvis, Alexandre Sater, Jeffrey Gordon, Allan Nguyen, Kaysie Banton, David Bar-Or
{"title":"老年创伤性脑损伤和颈椎损伤的颈领和吞咽困难:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Stephanie Jarvis, Alexandre Sater, Jeffrey Gordon, Allan Nguyen, Kaysie Banton, David Bar-Or","doi":"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysphagia, a complication of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), can lead to death. Cervical collar (c-collar) restriction may increase the risk for dysphagia. The objective was to determine how c-collars affect dysphagia rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included geriatric TBIs or cervical spine injuries (January 2016 to December 2018) at a Level 1 trauma center. Outcomes (dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory failure) were compared by c-collar placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 684 patients: 21.5% had a c-collar and 78.5% did not. Demographics, injury severity score, and Glasgow Coma Scale were comparable. Dysphagia (53.7% vs. 39.3%, p = .002) and respiratory failure (17.0% vs. 6.9%, p = .0002) were more common among patients with c-collars. Aspiration rates ( p = .11) were similar. After adjustment, patients with a c-collar had a significantly higher odds of dysphagia and respiratory failure. Among patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration ( p = .02) and respiratory failure ( p < .0001) were more common for those with c-collars.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-collar placement increased the risk for dysphagia and respiratory failure. There was evidence that swallow therapy may modify the effect of c-collar placement. For patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration was more common among those with a c-collar. Dysphagia screening among patients with a c-collar may improve patient quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":48801,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","volume":"45 3","pages":"160-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/31/jhq-45-160.PMC10153662.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cervical Collars and Dysphagia Among Geriatric TBIs and Cervical Spine Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Jarvis, Alexandre Sater, Jeffrey Gordon, Allan Nguyen, Kaysie Banton, David Bar-Or\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Dysphagia, a complication of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), can lead to death. Cervical collar (c-collar) restriction may increase the risk for dysphagia. The objective was to determine how c-collars affect dysphagia rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included geriatric TBIs or cervical spine injuries (January 2016 to December 2018) at a Level 1 trauma center. Outcomes (dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory failure) were compared by c-collar placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 684 patients: 21.5% had a c-collar and 78.5% did not. Demographics, injury severity score, and Glasgow Coma Scale were comparable. Dysphagia (53.7% vs. 39.3%, p = .002) and respiratory failure (17.0% vs. 6.9%, p = .0002) were more common among patients with c-collars. Aspiration rates ( p = .11) were similar. After adjustment, patients with a c-collar had a significantly higher odds of dysphagia and respiratory failure. Among patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration ( p = .02) and respiratory failure ( p < .0001) were more common for those with c-collars.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>C-collar placement increased the risk for dysphagia and respiratory failure. There was evidence that swallow therapy may modify the effect of c-collar placement. For patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration was more common among those with a c-collar. Dysphagia screening among patients with a c-collar may improve patient quality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"160-168\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/24/31/jhq-45-160.PMC10153662.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal for Healthcare Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000379\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Healthcare Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000379","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
吞咽困难是创伤性脑损伤(tbi)的一种并发症,可导致死亡。颈套(c型领)限制可能增加吞咽困难的风险。目的是确定c领如何影响吞咽困难的发生率。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括2016年1月至2018年12月在一级创伤中心的老年tbi或颈椎损伤。结果(吞咽困难、误吸和呼吸衰竭)通过放置c领进行比较。结果:684例患者中,21.5%有c领,78.5%无c领。人口统计学、损伤严重程度评分和格拉斯哥昏迷量表具有可比性。吞咽困难(53.7% vs. 39.3%, p = 0.002)和呼吸衰竭(17.0% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.002)在c领患者中更为常见。吸入率(p = 0.11)相似。调整后,c型颈圈患者出现吞咽困难和呼吸衰竭的几率明显更高。在未接受吞咽治疗的患者中,c领患者更常见的是误吸(p = 0.02)和呼吸衰竭(p < 0.0001)。结论:放置c型领增加了吞咽困难和呼吸衰竭的风险。有证据表明,吞咽疗法可以改变c型领放置的效果。对于未接受吞咽治疗的患者,c型领患者中误吸更为常见。c型领患者的吞咽困难筛查可以提高患者质量。
Cervical Collars and Dysphagia Among Geriatric TBIs and Cervical Spine Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Introduction: Dysphagia, a complication of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs), can lead to death. Cervical collar (c-collar) restriction may increase the risk for dysphagia. The objective was to determine how c-collars affect dysphagia rates.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included geriatric TBIs or cervical spine injuries (January 2016 to December 2018) at a Level 1 trauma center. Outcomes (dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory failure) were compared by c-collar placement.
Results: There were 684 patients: 21.5% had a c-collar and 78.5% did not. Demographics, injury severity score, and Glasgow Coma Scale were comparable. Dysphagia (53.7% vs. 39.3%, p = .002) and respiratory failure (17.0% vs. 6.9%, p = .0002) were more common among patients with c-collars. Aspiration rates ( p = .11) were similar. After adjustment, patients with a c-collar had a significantly higher odds of dysphagia and respiratory failure. Among patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration ( p = .02) and respiratory failure ( p < .0001) were more common for those with c-collars.
Conclusions: C-collar placement increased the risk for dysphagia and respiratory failure. There was evidence that swallow therapy may modify the effect of c-collar placement. For patients who did not receive swallow therapy, aspiration was more common among those with a c-collar. Dysphagia screening among patients with a c-collar may improve patient quality.
期刊介绍:
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. It has been selected for coverage in Thomson Reuter’s Science Citation Index Expanded, Social Sciences Citation Index®, and Current Contents®.
The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation. The journal covers topics such as:
Quality Improvement • Patient Safety • Performance Measurement • Best Practices in Clinical and Operational Processes • Innovation • Leadership • Information Technology • Spreading Improvement • Sustaining Improvement • Cost Reduction • Payment Reform