医生报酬的变化会导致全科诊所医疗服务的变化吗?

Q3 Medicine
Wisconsin Medical Journal Pub Date : 2022-12-01
Jennifer Lochner, Jen Birstler, Maureen A Smith, Paul Rathouz, Brian Arndt, Mark Micek, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Sandra Kamnetz, Nancy Pandhi
{"title":"医生报酬的变化会导致全科诊所医疗服务的变化吗?","authors":"Jennifer Lochner, Jen Birstler, Maureen A Smith, Paul Rathouz, Brian Arndt, Mark Micek, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Sandra Kamnetz, Nancy Pandhi","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many highly capitated systems still pay physicians based on relative value units (RVU), which may lead to excessive office visits. We reviewed electronic health records from the family medicine clinic panel members of 97 physicians and 42 residents to determine if a change from RVUs to panel-based compensation influenced care delivery as defined by the number of office visits and telephone contacts per panel member per month.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the electronic health records of patients seen in 4 residency training clinics, 10 community clinics, and 4 regional clinics was conducted. We assessed face-to-face care delivery and telephone call volume for the clinics individually and for the clinics pooled by clinic type from 1 year before to at least 1 year after the change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Change in physician compensation was not found to have an effect on office visits or telephone calls per panel member per month when pooled by clinic categories. Some significant effects were seen in individual clinics without any clear patterns by clinic size or type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Change in physician compensation was not a key driver of care delivery in family medicine clinics. Understanding changes in care delivery may require looking at a broad array of system, physician, and patient factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":38747,"journal":{"name":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103617/pdf/nihms-1875926.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a Change in Physician Compensation Lead to Changes in Care Delivery in Family Medicine Clinics?\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer Lochner, Jen Birstler, Maureen A Smith, Paul Rathouz, Brian Arndt, Mark Micek, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Sandra Kamnetz, Nancy Pandhi\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Many highly capitated systems still pay physicians based on relative value units (RVU), which may lead to excessive office visits. We reviewed electronic health records from the family medicine clinic panel members of 97 physicians and 42 residents to determine if a change from RVUs to panel-based compensation influenced care delivery as defined by the number of office visits and telephone contacts per panel member per month.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the electronic health records of patients seen in 4 residency training clinics, 10 community clinics, and 4 regional clinics was conducted. We assessed face-to-face care delivery and telephone call volume for the clinics individually and for the clinics pooled by clinic type from 1 year before to at least 1 year after the change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Change in physician compensation was not found to have an effect on office visits or telephone calls per panel member per month when pooled by clinic categories. Some significant effects were seen in individual clinics without any clear patterns by clinic size or type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Change in physician compensation was not a key driver of care delivery in family medicine clinics. Understanding changes in care delivery may require looking at a broad array of system, physician, and patient factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38747,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10103617/pdf/nihms-1875926.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wisconsin Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wisconsin Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目标:许多高度按人头付费的系统仍根据相对价值单位(RVU)向医生支付报酬,这可能会导致过多的门诊量。我们审查了家庭医学诊所小组成员(97 名医生和 42 名住院医师)的电子健康记录,以确定从相对价值单位到基于小组的补偿是否会影响医疗服务的提供,具体定义为小组成员每月的门诊次数和电话联系次数:我们对 4 家住院医师培训诊所、10 家社区诊所和 4 家地区诊所的患者电子健康记录进行了回顾性分析。我们评估了各诊所的面对面医疗服务提供情况和电话呼叫量,以及从变更前 1 年到变更后至少 1 年期间按诊所类型汇总的诊所的面对面医疗服务提供情况和电话呼叫量:结果:按诊所类别汇总后发现,医生报酬的变化并未对每位小组成员每月的门诊量或电话通话量产生影响。在个别诊所中发现了一些明显的影响,但没有发现诊所规模或类型的明显模式:结论:医生报酬的变化并不是家庭医学诊所医疗服务提供的主要驱动因素。要了解医疗服务的变化,可能需要考虑系统、医生和患者等一系列因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a Change in Physician Compensation Lead to Changes in Care Delivery in Family Medicine Clinics?

Background and objectives: Many highly capitated systems still pay physicians based on relative value units (RVU), which may lead to excessive office visits. We reviewed electronic health records from the family medicine clinic panel members of 97 physicians and 42 residents to determine if a change from RVUs to panel-based compensation influenced care delivery as defined by the number of office visits and telephone contacts per panel member per month.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the electronic health records of patients seen in 4 residency training clinics, 10 community clinics, and 4 regional clinics was conducted. We assessed face-to-face care delivery and telephone call volume for the clinics individually and for the clinics pooled by clinic type from 1 year before to at least 1 year after the change.

Results: Change in physician compensation was not found to have an effect on office visits or telephone calls per panel member per month when pooled by clinic categories. Some significant effects were seen in individual clinics without any clear patterns by clinic size or type.

Conclusions: Change in physician compensation was not a key driver of care delivery in family medicine clinics. Understanding changes in care delivery may require looking at a broad array of system, physician, and patient factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wisconsin Medical Journal
Wisconsin Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: The Wisconsin Medical Society is the largest association of medical doctors in the state with more than 12,000 members dedicated to the best interests of their patients. With that in mind, wisconsinmedicalsociety.org offers patients a unique source for reliable, physician-reviewed medical information. The Wisconsin Medical Society has been a trusted source for health policy leadership since 1841.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信